•   
  •   
  •   

Technology Police are using facial recognition for minor crimes because they can

15:41  24 october  2020
15:41  24 october  2020 Source:   cnet.com

Facial recognition designed to detect around face masks is failing, study finds

  Facial recognition designed to detect around face masks is failing, study finds Every algorithm saw increases in error rates once masks came into the picture. While some algorithms still had accuracy overall, like Chinese facial recognition company Dahua's algorithm error rate going from 0.3% without masks to 6% with masks, others had error rates increasing up to 99%. Rank One, a facial recognition provider used in cities like Detroit, had an error rate of 0.6% without masks, and a 34.5% error rate once masks were digitally applied. In May, the company started offering "periocular recognition," which claimed to be able to identify people just off their eyes and nose.

In Florida, facial recognition has long been part of daily policing . The sheriff’s office in Pinellas County, on the west side of Tampa Bay, wrangled federal Only one American court is known to have ruled on the use of facial recognition by law enforcement, and it gave credence to the idea that a

One concern with government use of facial recognition is that, like other algorithmic systems, the And outside of traditional law enforcement contexts, facial recognition can also be used to authorize Additionally, to prevent the use of facial recognition for minor offenses like shoplifting

Cities all across the US have passed bans on facial recognition, with variations in how strong the regulations are. Though Portland, Oregon, banned facial recognition from all government and commercial use, others are only limiting it from police use.

Peter Cade/Getty Images © Provided by CNET Peter Cade/Getty Images   Police are using facial recognition for minor crimes because they can © Peter Cade / Getty Images

Some cities, like Detroit, have enacted lighter measures, such as allowing facial recognition to be used only when investigating violent crimes, while police in New York have been able to use the technology for crimes like shoplifting.

On Oct. 9, a New York judge decided in a package-theft case that facial recognition identification could be submitted as evidence in the trial, but he noted that lawmakers should set limits on how the technology could be used.

Face recognition isn't just for humans — it's learning to identify bears and cows, too

  Face recognition isn't just for humans — it's learning to identify bears and cows, too It's hard for the average person to tell Dani, Lenore, and Bella apart: They all sport fashionably fuzzy brown coats and enjoy a lot of the same activities, like playing in icy-cold water and, occasionally, ripping apart a freshly caught fish. © Melanie Clapham Melanie Clapham is not the average person. As a bear biologist, she has spent over a decade studying these grizzly bears, who live in Knight Inlet in British Columbia, Canada, and developed a sense for who is who by paying attention to little things that make them different.

Despite “real-time” facial recognition ’s dazzling potential for crime -prevention, it is also raising alarms of the Police in China are reportedly using it to pick suspects out of crowds, and retailers there are using it to That is because facial recognition has never been perfect, and probably never will be .

Which police forces are using facial recognition ? Big Brother Watch submitted freedom of information requests to every police force in the UK. "Regarding 'false' positive matches - we do not consider these as false positive matches because additional checks and balances are in place to confirm

The judge cited concerns about free speech, noting that facial recognition could be used to identify and track protesters -- which both the NYPD and the Miami police did in August.

Those sorts of issues, and the intrusiveness of facial recognition generally, have prompted widespread calls for regulation, but there's debate among technology companies, lawmakers and civil rights groups on where to draw the line.

The US has no federal regulations on facial recognition, leaving thousands of police departments to determine their own limits. Advocates say that's a concern for civil liberties. While some members of Congress propose an indefinite nationwide ban on police use, other bills suggest it could still be allowed with a warrant, or they prevent only businesses from using it.

Hillicon Valley: Trump fires top federal cybersecurity official, GOP senators push back | Apple to pay $113 million to resolve fight over batteries | Los Angeles Police ban use of third-party facial recognition software

  Hillicon Valley: Trump fires top federal cybersecurity official, GOP senators push back | Apple to pay $113 million to resolve fight over batteries | Los Angeles Police ban use of third-party facial recognition software Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill's newsletter detailing all you need to know about the tech and cyber news from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. If you don't already, be sure to sign up for our newsletter with this LINK.Welcome! Follow our cyber reporter, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and tech team, Chris Mills Rodrigo (@chrisismills) and Rebecca Klar (@rebeccaklar_), for more coverage.TRUMP FIRES KREBS: President Trump ousted Christopher Krebs, the top U.S. cybersecurity official, on Tuesday evening, disagreeing with his statement affirming the security of the 2020 election.

Facial recognition software should only be used by police if they can prove it will not introduce gender or racial bias to operations, an ethics panel has The technology has been used to scan faces in large crowds in public places such as streets and shopping centres, and in football crowds and at

Chinese police are using facial recognition glasses to identify ‘fugitives’ passing through a crowded train station. The futuristic technology may be the next Specifically designed for police use , the smart spectacles are connected to a tablet-like device that allows officers to take mugshots and compare

Police often frame facial recognition as a necessary tool to solve the most heinous crimes, like terrorist attacks and violent assaults, but researchers have found that the technology is more frequently used for low-level offenses.

In a recent court filing, the NYPD noted that it's turned to facial recognition in more than 22,000 cases in the last three years.

"Even though the NYPD claims facial recognition is only used for serious crimes, the numbers tell a different story," said Albert Fox Cahn, the executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. "As facial recognition continues to grow, it's being routinely deployed for everything from shoplifting to graffiti."

Asked for comment, an NYPD spokeswoman pointed to a 2019 opinion article by police commissioner James O'Neill titled "How Facial Recognition Makes You Safer." In the piece, O'Neill talked about how facial recognition had been used to make arrests in murder, robbery and rape cases, but he didn't disclose how often it was used for low-level crimes.

Jacob Blake reportedly paralyzed, Wisconsin protests ignite fires across Kenosha: What we know

  Jacob Blake reportedly paralyzed, Wisconsin protests ignite fires across Kenosha: What we know Protests broke out and fires were set around Wisconsin after a 29-year-old Black man was shot by police in Kenosha. Here's what we know.FDA expands access to plasma treatment for COVID-19

The Metropolitan police are rolling this technology out on to our streets, warns tech expert For now, the technology will be primarily used to find suspects wanted for serious or violent crime . Live facial recognition of the kind the Met is deploying detects all faces on video footage and then compares the

Police should be allowed to use facial recognition to investigate specific crimes and to protect the public at major events, according to the first national survey of the public’s attitude to the technology. They are opposed to unrestricted use but two thirds (65 per cent)

The department's facial recognition policy, established in March, allows the technology to be used for any crime, no matter the severity. Without any limits, police have more frequently used the technology for petty thefts than the dangerous crimes, privacy advocates say.

Before Amazon put a moratorium on police use of its Rekognition face-identifying software, the program was used in a $12 shoplifting case in Oregon in 2018. Those cases aren't highlighted in Amazon's marketing material, which plays up how the technology is used to find leads on the victims of human trafficking.

At The Wall Street Journal's Tech Live virtual conference on Oct. 20, Hoan Ton-That, CEO of facial recognition startup Clearview AI, said it isn't the company's responsibility to make sure its technology is being properly used by its thousands of police partners.

Though the company has its own guidelines, Ton-That said Clearview AI wouldn't be enforcing them, saying that "it's not our job to set the policy as a tech company."

Facial recognition without limits

Before Detroit established its facial recognition policy, the technology led to the wrongful arrests of at least two Black men in the city -- both falsely accused of being involved in theft cases.

The LAPD Just Banned Its Officers From Using Third-Party Facial Recognition Software

  The LAPD Just Banned Its Officers From Using Third-Party Facial Recognition Software The Los Angeles Police Department issued a moratorium on the use of commercial facial recognition software on Tuesday, effectively ending a trial with dystopian software manufacturer Clearview AI that the department had long sought to downplay. © Photo: David McNew / Staff (Getty Images) The decision reportedly comes after Buzzfeed News probed the LAPD’s use of the software, which officials had in the past claimed to only deploy “sparingly.

Police forces in the US have pointed to the successful use of facial recognition technology to identify missing children and criminals . Those accused of crimes because of facial recognition software are often not told the technology has been used . There are also concerns the technology could be

Heavy use of facial recognition during protests, as well as cell phone tracking software and other types of ID monitoring is one way we could easily go Currently police should not being using facial recognition systems, because they are notoriously unreliable, especially at correctly identifying

Robert Williams was arrested in January and accused of stealing about $3,800 worth of watches after Detroit's facial recognition falsely matched surveillance footage to his driver's license photo. In May 2019, the same facial recognition program wrongly identified Michael Oliver in a larceny case.

Facial recognition is known to have a record of racial bias, with researchers finding that the artificial intelligence frequently misidentifies people of color and women.

When it's able to be used without limits by police departments, the technology increases the chances of mistakes and threatens privacy, said Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, author of The Rise of Big Data Policing and a law professor at the University of the District of Columbia.

"Facial recognition should never be used for misdemeanor or low-level felony cases," Ferguson said. "Technology that can destroy privacy in public should be used sparingly and under strict controls."

Without any limits, police can use facial recognition however they please, and in many cases, arrested suspects don't even know that the flawed technology was used.

Williams didn't know that Detroit police used facial recognition to find him, until an investigator mentioned the detail during their conversation. Attorneys representing protesters in Miami didn't know that police used facial recognition in their arrests, according to an NBC Miami report. Police used facial recognition software in a $50 drug dealing case in Florida in 2016 but made no mention of it in the arrest report.

Experts reveal how a broad smile transforms Melania Trump's face

  Experts reveal how a broad smile transforms Melania Trump's face Dr Hussain Cheema, co-founder and director of Fvce, told FEMAIL a broad smile could alter the appearance of a face so dramatically the person could appear 'unrecognisable'.The conspiracy theory that Melania has a lookalike stand in for her at public events has circulated on social media for years, resurfacing whenever proponents spot a slight change in her appearance.

In a paper published in October 2019, Ferguson recommended limiting facial recognition to serious felonies, similar to how police restrict the use of wiretapping. He said it's dangerous to assume police should be allowed to use technology as they wish, saying it could damage people's privacy in the long run.

"That assumption is based on valuing the cost of crime higher than the cost to privacy, security and a growing imbalance of police power," Ferguson said. "Prosecuting low-level crimes at the expense of creating an extensive surveillance system may not be the balance society needs."

A full ban

Limits would be a welcome start, but privacy advocates argue they're not enough.

Activists in Detroit are still working to get facial recognition banned in the city after the City Council voted to renew its contract in September. The police department's limits on reserving facial recognition for violent crimes came only after months of protests, said Tawana Petty, director of the Data Justice Program for the Detroit Community Technology Project.

Because of the technology's track record for mistakes, she said, any use of it, even under the strictest regulations, leaves the potential for false arrests.

In a City Council meeting in June, Detroit's police chief, James Craig, said the facial recognition software misidentified people 96% of the time without human intervention. By Oct. 12, the police had used facial recognition on Black people about 97% of the time, according to the department's weekly report.

"My stance is that there is potential to lock people up for violent crimes they didn't commit," Petty said. "The technology is a dangerous assault on the civil liberties and privacy rights we all deserve to have protected."

Royals to sign LHP Mike Minor .
The Royals have agreed to a deal with southpaw Mike Minor. The contract will become official when Minor passes a physical. Minor is represented by Jet Sports Management. © Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports ESPN.com’s Jeff Passan reports that it is a multi-year pact between the two sides, with MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand adding that the contract is for two years. This tops MLBTR’s prediction of a one-year, $6M contract for Minor, and he is now the first free agent of the 2020-21 offseason to sign a multi-year contract.

usr: 1
This is interesting!