•   
  •   
  •   

Technology UK court dismisses Epic Games lawsuit against Apple

03:25  23 february  2021
03:25  23 february  2021 Source:   zdnet.com

Amy Coney Barrett steers the Supreme Court to the right, but not toward President Trump

  Amy Coney Barrett steers the Supreme Court to the right, but not toward President Trump The former federal judge and law school professor joined the court amid a pandemic, a hotly contested election and an avalanche of high-profile cases.Two months into Barrett's tenure, those fears look to be unfounded. But conservatives remain hopeful she will advance the cause of religious freedom, expand Second Amendment rights and cement a conservative majority on the nation's highest court.

a close up of a sign © Image: Epic Games

The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal has dismissed Epic Games' lawsuit against Apple that had accused the iPhone maker of acting anti-competitively in the app distribution and payments sector.

In the ruling, the court explained that the case was dismissed as the main target, the UK arm of Apple, provides research and development and other technical services to other companies within the Apple group, but it "does not provide support for technological or systems related issues".

Due to this, the court found the UK arm was not responsible for deciding which apps may or may not be supplied through Apple's app store and, therefore, a case could not be made that Apple's UK arm acted anti-competitively.

Apple proxy statement includes section about antitrust risk for the first time

  Apple proxy statement includes section about antitrust risk for the first time Antitrust scrutiny of Apple and other big tech giants ratcheted up over the past year. And for the first time, Apple has noted in its annual proxy statement that antitrust issues are an area of focus for its board of director's audit committee.Antitrust scrutiny of Apple and other big tech giants ratcheted up over the past year. And for the first time, Apple has noted in its annual proxy statement that antitrust issues are an area of focus for its board of director's audit committee.

The court did acknowledge, however, that the dispute had merits in the United States.

"In my view, that is a significant factor in favour of the US as the appropriate forum. It is clear from even a cursory reading of the judgment of 9 October 2020, and hardly surprising, that many of the same issues of substance which arise under UK competition law arise under US antitrust law," Justice Peter Roth said.

The dismissal brings the number of lawsuits Epic Games has underway against Apple down to three. The remaining legal processes, filed in Australia, the US, and the EU all specifically target Apple's app distribution and payment processes.

Epic Games has provided similar arguments across all of its lawsuits, saying in each one that it is not seeking damages from Apple but, instead, it wants for regulators to "address Apple's alleged anti-competitive conduct".

Buccaneers activate LB Shaquil Barrett off reserve/COVID-19 list

  Buccaneers activate LB Shaquil Barrett off reserve/COVID-19 list Buccaneers linebacker Shaquil Barrett is expected to be in uniform for this weekend’s wild-card playoff game against Washington. Tampa Bay announced on Wednesday that it has activated Barrett from the reserve/COVID-19 list. © Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports Shaquil Barrett is expected to play in this weekend’s wild-card playoff game against Washington. We learned last week that linebacker Devin White had tested positive for COVID-19, and Barrett subsequently landed on the reserve/COVID-19 list as a close contact.

"Apple has become what it once railed against: The behemoth seeking to control markets, block competition, and stifle innovation. Apple is bigger, more powerful, more entrenched, and more pernicious than the monopolists of yesteryear. At a market cap of nearly $2 trillion, Apple's size and reach far exceeds that of any technology monopolist in history," Epic said in its US claim, which was the first of the lawsuits to be filed.

The two companies have been engaged in a spat since August last year, after Apple and Google blocked Fortnite from their respective app stores in response to Epic Games implementing an in-app payment system within the game to circumvent payment of the 30% commission fee to those stores.

Over the weekend, Apple filed a subpoena against Valve requesting information regarding the company's yearly sales, revenue, and pricing for its Steam store apps as part of its legal fight with Epic Games. While Valve is not party to the Epic Games-Apple standoff, Apple has asked for this information as it claims the information is necessary to calculate market size and definition for its case.

50 best gangster movies of all time

  50 best gangster movies of all time From “The Godfather” to “Goodfellas,” Stacker compiled a list of the 50 best gangster movies of all time, using data from IMDb and Metacritic.

Valve has already produced documents regarding its revenue share, competition with Epic, Steam distribution contracts, and other documents, but it has refused to provide pricing information due to it being confidential and burdensome to gather in the manner Apple requested.

HERE'S MORE

  • Epic Games extends legal fight against Apple to the European Union
  • Epic Games brings Apple legal stoush to Australia
  • Apple mercilessly mocked by Epic where it hurts
  • Epic Games to lose Apple ID sign on for accounts
  • Apple countersues Epic Games on allegations of breaching App Store contract
  • Court stops Apple from taking away Epic's developer access, Unreal Engine protected
  • Apple releases study to justify App Store business model ahead of antitrust hearing
  • Why Apple's antitrust fight could spell the end of iOS as we know it
  • Fortnite fight: Epic lawsuit vs. Apple's App Store aims for leverage, pressure, and a better deal
  • Fortnite battle escalates: Apple to terminate developer program membership, Epic files injunction
  • Fortnite vs. Apple and Google: What it means for tech leaders (TechRepublic)

Apple won’t have to allow App Store alternatives on iOS after North Dakota bill fails .
The bill failed in a 11-36 vote on TuesdayThe bill, SB 2333, stirred considerable controversy last week when a committee hearing drew the attention of corporate lawyers and lobbyists, experts, and Apple critics arguing both in favor and against the proposed legislation’s potentially far-reaching consequences.

usr: 4
This is interesting!