Technology The GCC Steering Committee takes a step away from the Free Software Foundation
What Google's API copyright win over Oracle means
The experts agree this Supreme Court decision was a victory for developers and open-source software.Oracle had argued for over a decade that Google had infringed Oracle's copyright, by copying the "structure, sequence, and organization" of 37 Java application programming interfaces (APIs) into Android. Google replied that an API is like an alphabet or a grammar. They're the fundamental elements used to create programs. SCOTUS, led by Justice Stephen Breyer, agreed with Google's argument. Almost everyone not on an Oracle payroll agreed as well.
When the, the board hadn't reckoned with how others would see his return. Even the , which oversaw the free software's primary collection of programming language tools, , from its membership. Now, the GCC Steering Committee has relaxed its decades-old requirement that new and modified GCC code should have its copyright assigned to the FSF.
RMS proponents see this as the GCC community moving away from the FSF. Diehard RMS loyalists even see it as the GCC perhaps steering away from free software. The GCC Steering Committee, however, specifically denied this. "The, and that will never change."
The Linux Foundation's demands to the University of Minnesota for its bad Linux patches security project
ZDNet has obtained a copy of the Linux Foundation's letter to the University of Minnesota laying out what happened with the bad Linux kernel patches 'research project' and demanding that 'all information necessary to identify all proposals of known-vulnerable code from any U of MN experiment'.Greg Kroah-Hartman, the Linux kernel maintainer for the stable branch and well-known for being the most generous and easy-going of the Linux kernel maintainers, exploded and banned UMN developers from working on the Linux kernel. That was because their patches had been "obviously submitted in bad faith with the intent to cause problems.
Specifically what's happened is David Edelsohn, IBM's CTO GCC Technology, and a, announced that:
The GCC Steering Committee has decided to relax the requirement to assign copyright for all changes to the Free Software Foundation. GCC will continue to be developed, distributed, and licensed under the. GCC will now accept contributions with or without an FSF copyright assignment. This change is consistent with the practices of many other major Free Software projects, such as the Linux kernel.
Opinion: It's time to hold climate polluters accountable
Doctors Carroll Muffett and Kert Davies write that in light of a recent study that found that one in five deaths worldwide could be attributed to air pollution, there must be a bigger effort to fight back the discrediting campaigns against science.Panic spread through Los Angeles when the city was first overrun by smog in July 1943, in the middle of World War II. With dense smog cutting visibility, irritating eyes and making it difficult to breathe outside, some locals believed they were being hit by a Japanese chemical attack.
So, what does that mean? Edelsohn continued that if you were happy to let the FSF have your copyright, you didn't need to do a thing. But now you can have a choice. You can also donate your code with a[DCO license]. To do that, developers should add a Signed-off-by message to their commit messages. "Developers with commit access may add their name to the DCO list in the MAINTAINERS file to certify the DCO for all future commits in lieu of individual Signed-off-by messages for each commit."
Eben Moglen, Columbia law professor, one of the architects of the, and Chairman of , added in an interview, "I am not, and SFLC is not, counsel to FSF, the GNU Project, or the GCC Steering Committee. We do not speak for any of them. I have read the GCC Steering Committee statement on copyright assignment, and on that basis, I can give an independent legal opinion." The effect of this change, "as the GCC Steering Committee states, is to loosen the bonds between FSF and the GCC projects."
Biden orders federal cyber upgrade after barrage of hacks
The far-reaching directive is an attempt to close longstanding gaps in the government’s ability to block and investigate hacks.The executive order, which has been in development for months, addresses federal computer networks — not the critical infrastructure operated by private companies such as Colonial Pipeline, which suffered a major ransomware attack that led to hoarding and gasoline shortages throughout the eastern U.S. But some of the directive’s provisions could also influence how the Biden administration works to secure the United States' poorly protected infrastructure facilities.
DCOs are used by many open-source projects as an alternative to a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). The, but it doesn't absolutely require it. Indeed, the FSF will also accept donations in some cases under a DCO.
Typically, free software/open-source CLAs require the contributor to grant a copyright license in the contribution to the open-source project, its maintainer, and/or downstream recipients. CLAs are not standardized, so contributions may be subject to different CLAs or none at all. For example, besides the FSF, the, the , , and to name a few, require CLAs.
In this case, Moglen continued the "FSF will long remain the preponderant copyright holder in GCC and related projects, but the Steering Committee and its counsel will now begin taking into account in the projects' legal relationships the presence of other copyright holders, to the extent that it chooses to incorporate contributions from non-assigning parties."
How Hemkunt Foundation helped 10,000 Indians during oxygen crisis
"We are helping Indian hospitals and government, too. The president's house and several governments have reached out to us in need of oxygen," said Irinder Singh Ahluwalia, founder and CEO of Hemkunt Foundation. Started by Ahluwalia in 2010, the foundation has been providing aid and doing rehabilitation work for several causes. For instance, after a devastating flood in the northern Indian state of Uttrakhand in 2013, Singh’s NGO helped in rebuilding houses and roads.
But, what is different, Moglen said, is that while the "GCC is not changing anything about its 'outbound' licensing," it's a different story with the "inbound" licensing.
As for the outbound license, it's the same as ever. "The compiler and associated elements of the toolchain remain licensed under the terms of GPLv3, as modified by the relevant additional permissions. No downstream user, modifier or redistributor of GCC is facing any changes whatsoever."
What's new, said Moglen, is "The GCC Steering Committee has decided, on the 'inbound' side of its projects, not to require copyright assignment to FSF for contributions. Copyright assignment to FSF was traditionally required for "core" GNU Project components. Instead, the Steering Committee has decided to allow contributors to keep their own copyrights, if they wish. Such contributors can submit a Developer Certificate of Origin, stating that the contribution is their own work, or the work of others who have given them authority to certify origin, and that they have the necessary rights to make the contribution. This is the mechanism by which the Linux kernel project, among other non-FSF managers of GPL'd code, accept contributions to their works."
Historically, not all free software and open-source supporters have like CLAs. As attorneys at the international law firm, point out, "A common criticism of CLAs is their potential to discourage contributions to the open-source project. A legal contract defining rights and obligations, and potential liabilities, associated with a contribution can be intimidating to software developers who simply want to contribute minor bug fixes or other refinements to existing open-source code."
The no-code movement is in the early stages but will bring exciting new possibilities, expert says
The future is full of innovation potential with no-code and low-code systems. It will help developers as well as citizen developers who don't know any programming languages.SEE: Everything you need to know about using low-code platforms (free PDF) (TechRepublic)
It was to help avoid that, and related issues, that thereleased the first DCO in 2004. Since then, DCOs have been used in the Linux kernel and numerous open-source projects.
As for the GCC, in another message, Edelsohn expressly stated, "The-- it solely expands the options available. … Individuals and companies can choose how to proceed with their existing FSF copyright assignments. Individuals and companies may continue to establish new copyright assignments with the FSF."
Needless to say, not everyone is happy with this change even if it is optional. Some think the GCC Steering Committee doesn't have the right to make the decision. Others, like Jose E. Marchesi, head of Oracle's GNU toolchain division, believe they and theirand are requesting that the change be held in abeyance for now. Still, others worry over what this means .
Heather Meeker, a partner at the law firmwho specializes in open-source software licensing, however, thinks the GCC Steering Committee has made a smart move. Meeker wrote, "This and it's a welcome development. Over the years, various contributors had refused to agree to the FSF's contribution assignment agreement, a document that is unusual in both substance and form. As to substance, while assignments for contributions were more common a couple of decades ago, today they are quite rare; most open source projects today either use license in=out (with or without a DCO) or a CLA with a non-exclusive license grant. As to form, the FSF's assignment contains some truly unique language about patents that patent licensing lawyers find perplexing, causing companies to balk at making contributions to FSF projects simply because they can't parse the terms."
In short, Meeker expects, "This move should pave the way for more contributors to feel comfortable contributing to GCC." We'll see if that is indeed the case.
Salesforce TrailheaDX 2021: One big reason why non-developers and devs should tune in .
Salesforce CTO and co-founder Parker Harris reveals the big theme's for TDX 2021 and what's next for the future of business software development. As Harris describes it, "developers" are being moved closer to the business problems they are trying to solve, and more people within the organization are being empowered to work on and solve those same problems. Gone are the days when a company could wait months for their IT department or engineering shop to create every application or automate every process.