Technology King County ban on police use of facial recognition software spotlights local movements across US
Emmys 2021: Supporting Actor in a Comedy — Our 7 Dream Nominees!
It’s not a question of if anyone from Ted Lasso will be nominated for Supporting Actor in a Comedy at this year’s Emmys. It’s more a question of how many of the show’s performers will make the cut. In our Dream Emmy scenario, we put the number at around three. Meanwhile, we’re also stumping hard for
Facial recognition opponents rejoiced this week after the local government of King County, Washington.
The move was notable for a number of reasons. The ACLU of Washingtonthat the new King County ban on police use of facial recognition software was the first in the country to be county-wide and cover multiple cities.
Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff attorney Adam Schwartz added that it was the most populous government body to institute a ban, with more than two million residents within its borders. The ban was also hailed among privacy advocates as a direct shot at Microsoft and Amazon, both of which have headquarters in King County's biggest city: Seattle.
Nijeer Parks was arrested due to a false facial recognition match
Nijeer Parks was innocent. That didn't stop police from arresting him based on a false facial recognition match.Parks, a 31-year-old Black man living in Paterson, New Jersey, had received a frantic phone call from his grandmother telling him that police from Woodbridge, a town 30 miles away, had come looking for him at the apartment they shared. This was all a misunderstanding, he had thought. Parks had trouble with the law in his past, but that was behind him. Since being released from prison on drug-related charges, he had changed his life and was now working a steady job as a carpenter.
"The movement to ban this tech is growing across the country. Even when 100% accurate, this technology ends up disproportionately harming marginalized communities. No technology should outweigh the people's right to privacy," the ACLU of Washington said in a statement.
- See also:
Last year, at the height of the protests over police brutality and racism, there was athat there should be legislation governing how and when police can use facial recognition software. Multiple studies from , , the and other organizations have repeatedly proven that all facial recognition platforms have particular difficulty in distinguishing the faces of people with darker skin.
Amazon's Best Deals on Ray-Ban Sunglasses-- Save Up to 50% Off Select Styles
Amazon's best deals on Ray-Ban sunglasses and save up to 50% off select styles.The eyewear brand launched in the 1930s and has become a summer staple accessory for influencers and celebrities alike. Having a pair of Ray-Ban sunnies in the mix is key for a stylish summer season. Bonus: Amazon Prime wardrobe shoppers can try select shades for free for seven days to make sure they're the right fit.
In 2020, at least three cases emerged involving people of color who were detained and arrested based on mistakes made by a facial recognition software in use by a local police force. The Detroit Police Department was forced to apologize and change its policies after theyin front of his wife, children and neighbors based on a faulty match.
Despite the national concern about how the technology functions, little has been done to stop police departments, airports, arena operators and other organizations from. Multiple bills on the issue from both Republicans and Democrats .
In place of federal action, dozens of cities, towns and counties have stepped up to the plate to pass local bans on police department use of the technology.
Both theand advocacy group have created maps showing the thousands of businesses and law enforcement bodies currently using some form of facial recognition.
Banned gamblers in South Australia to be found using facial recognition tech
A number of gaming rooms in South Australia have adopted facial recognition tech from Vix Vizion as part of the state's gambling reforms that went live in December.The tech, installed in over 80% of venues that offer gambling, including pubs, clubs, and casinos, has been delivered by Vix Vizion, in partnership with Cradlepoint.
But Fight For The Future has also built out interactive maps showing every city and town that has instituted local bans on police use of the technology.
Four governments in California -- the city councils of Oakland, San Francisco, Alameda and Berkeley -- have passed facial recognition bans while multiple cities and towns in Massachusetts have passed some form of legislation either banning or regulating the technology.
There are also bans in Portland, Oregon; Jackson, Mississippi; Madison, Wisconsin; Minneapolis; New Orleans; Pittsburgh; and Portland, Maine.
The only governments to pass statewide legislation banning or regulating facial recognition use by police areand . In May, Massachusetts that force police to get a warrant before running someone's photo through a facial recognition database.
"The growing list of cities, counties, and states banning facial recognition shows just how toxic the tech, and just how powerful our movement, have become," Caitlin Seeley George, campaign director for Fight For The Future, told ZDNet.
Washington State County Becomes First in US to Ban Facial Recognition Software Over Concerns of Racism
King County's ban on facial recognition software is "an important step forward in the effort to stop government use of this harmful and racist technology," said Jennifer Lee from ACLU Washington.A "groundbreaking" proposal for the ban was approved Tuesday by the King County Council to protect the county's 2.3 million citizens' freedoms from government surveillance since studies revealed "facial recognition software is often far more likely to misidentify Black or Asian faces, especially Black women," the council announced in a statement.
"More communities are coming together to fight this racist, biased tech, and bans are gaining momentum in Baltimore, MD, New York City, and even Nebraska. All of these efforts are critical to protecting people now, and are also building momentum and support for a federal ban on facial recognition that would protect everyone from this technology."
She added that private companies are also shying away from the technology, and a number of the larger retailers in the US have said they don't use or plan to use facial recognition in their stores. The only city that has banned corporations from using facial recognition is Portland.
Schwartz explained that there is growing public demand for government bans on the use of the technology and said the Electronic Frontier Foundation is optimistic that more states and cities will begin passing bans or regulations on it.
While Schwartz said that the Electronic Frontier Foundation did not support bans on corporate use of facial recognition software, he noted that one of the easiest first steps local communities can take is forcing police departments to at least obtain warrants before being able to put photos through a facial recognition system.
Facial recognition tech is supporting mass surveillance. It's time for a ban, say privacy campaigners
A group of 51 organizations has written an open letter to European commissioners calling for the ban of all deployments of facial recognition tools that can snoop on citizens.Comprising activist groups from across the continent, such as Big Brother Watch UK, AlgorithmWatch and the European Digital Society, the call was chaperoned by advocacy network the European Digital Rights (EDRi) in the form of an open letter to the European commissioner for Justice, Didier Reynders.
"Those false arrests are physically dangerous to people and the technology is racially discriminatory because of the disparate error rates with the technology. It is an Orwellian invasion of privacy because of all of the cameras that are out in public and the increasing integration of those cameras into one big network," Schwartz said.
"Facial recognition chills and deters people from showing up to protests in public places because they're worried about face recognition spying on them and making a record of their dissent. People at protests have been identified by the police and people who are fully innocent have been misidentified."
Democratic lawmakers want to ban the federal government from using facial recognition .
Four Democratic lawmakers want to ban the federal government from using facial recognition technology. Led by Massachusetts Senator Edward J. Markey and Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley, the group plans to introduce The Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act to Congress. If passed, the bill would prohibit federal authorities from using the technology alongside several other biometric tools like voice recognition. Perhaps even more significantly, state and local entities, including law enforcement agencies, would need to pass their own moratoriums to secure funding from the federal government.