Technology Opinion: Biden's continuation of this cruel Trump policy is an outrage

04:55  06 june  2021
04:55  06 june  2021 Source:   cnn.com

Derek Chauvin trial, COVID-19 vaccine side effects, FLOTUS agenda: 5 things to know Wednesday

  Derek Chauvin trial, COVID-19 vaccine side effects, FLOTUS agenda: 5 things to know Wednesday The Derek Chauvin trial will continue with more expert testimony, a study on COVID-19 vaccine side effects is out and more news to start your Wednesday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

President Joe Biden ran for office on a platform that included respecting science, promoting public health and restoring humanity to the rule of law to our immigration policies. During his first 100 days in office, he rightly focused on restoring public trust in both government and science and placed confronting the global rising tide of authoritarianism at the center of his foreign policy.

a group of people standing in front of a crowd: trump impidio migracion covid19 crisis migrante biden estados unidos jorge durand aristegui mexico_00001101.png © Provided by CNN trump impidio migracion covid19 crisis migrante biden estados unidos jorge durand aristegui mexico_00001101.png

So it is perplexing that his administration continues to exploit a policy, Title 42, making a mockery of science, misusing public health arguments, violating human rights and contravening US law and bedrock international agreements under the guise of Covid-19 precautions.

Biden's 1st 100 days: Promises kept, broken, or in progress

  Biden's 1st 100 days: Promises kept, broken, or in progress Here's a look at how President Joe Biden is measuring up against the markers he set for himself. As a candidate and incoming president, he had promised a series of swift and sweeping actions to address the range of challenges he inherited.

Recently, in a rare public statement directed at the United States, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has called on the US government to "swiftly lift the public health-related asylum restrictions that remain in effect at the border and to restore access to asylum for the people whose lives depend on it, in line with international legal and human rights obligations."

Title 42 is a section of the Public Health Service Act of 1944 that allows the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to implement public health measures at borders to prevent the introduction of a communicable disease. The CDC order, issued on March 17, 2020, blocks only certain migrants at the US borders with Mexico and Canada while allowing others to enter.

President Biden's first 100 days: What he's gotten done

  President Biden's first 100 days: What he's gotten done President Joe Biden has moved fast since his January 20 swearing-in, signing a $1.9 trillion Covid relief bill into law less than two months into his term and issuing more executive orders so far than his three predecessors. © Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images A first-grader works on an English exercise on the first day of class in Los Angeles on April 13, 2021. Those efforts have paid off, with the administration reaching the milestones of 200 million coronavirus shots delivered and vaccine eligibility opened to everyone 16 and over before Biden's 100th day in office.

This is a Trump-era gambit at its worst that aligns with larger schemes designed by former President Trump's senior policy adviser Stephen Miller to use public health as an excuse to close the border. The pandemic provided a perfect pretext for shutting down the US asylum system at the border and expelling nearly all refugees to face danger in Mexico or the countries they fled.

Title 42 authorizes the federal government to prohibit the introduction of people and property to protect Americans from contagious diseases, but it does not authorize the expulsion of people once they have entered the United States. Using Sections 362 and 365 of Title 42, the Trump administration not only disregarded the Refugee Act of 1980 and Refugee Convention by expelling back to danger people who have already entered the country, but weaponizes a health directive as immigration policy. Put simply, the CDC is a health agency, not an immigration agency. It has no authority to expel anyone, yet the Border Patrol is considering Title 42 authorization to expel people. This is not legal.

How Joe Biden's speech to Congress differs from past presidential addresses

  How Joe Biden's speech to Congress differs from past presidential addresses Things will look a lot different during the annual presidential address, from COVID-19 guidelines to history being made behind the podium.The address, which technically is not called the State of the Union, will be the first time a U.S. president speaks to both houses of Congress since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, as former President Donald Trump delivered his last State of the Union on Feb. 4, 2020.

Experts have stated that the use of Title 42 to stop only people seeking asylum and other migrants "has no scientific basis as a public health measure." Around the time it was issued, even some at the CDC questioned the science behind the order. Indeed, an order that targets only a small fraction of people — namely, asylum seekers — crossing the US-Mexico border, which remains one of the busiest frontiers on the planet, could never have been effective as a national public health measure.

Some school children, truck drivers and even many tourists continue to cross the border freely as they did before the pandemic. In the first six months of Title 42, more than 40 million passengers and pedestrians entered the US through the southern border, the Los Angeles Times reported. While the number of apprehensions at the border surpassed 170,000 in April 2021, the actual number of people trying to cross the border, including those seeking asylum, is likely much smaller. In March, for instance, 28% of people expelled under Title 42 had previously been expelled, indicating multiple crossings, according to US Customs and Border Protection.

Why President Joe Biden's speech to Congress was unlike any other in modern history

  Why President Joe Biden's speech to Congress was unlike any other in modern history A joint sessions speech, known for its glad-handing cadence, was bound to be subdued with only 200 folks permitted at an event that can hold 1,500.President Joe Biden's address to a joint session of Congress was unlike any in modern history due to the COVID-19 pandemic. With no more than 200 folks permitted for an event that can hold up to 1,500, an event known for its glad-handing cadence and rousing moments was destined to be subdued.

Under Title 42, people seeking asylum are immediately turned away with the vast majority not even allowed to present their claims for asylum as required by law. After expulsion, they may be once again at risk of facing kidnappings, attacks and persecution. Some asylum seekers are detained in congregate settings on the US side of the border before being expelled, exacerbating the potential spread of Covid-19. And since the Biden administration decided to protect only unaccompanied children from expulsion, parents face the cruel decision of whether to send their children to safety in the United States, fueling the separation of families.

Before the election, a Biden campaign spokesperson said that if elected, the Biden administration would direct the CDC and Department of Homeland Security to "review this policy and make the appropriate changes to ensure that people have the ability to submit their asylum claims while ensuring that we are taking the appropriate Covid-19 safety precautions, as guided by the science and public health experts."

But when asked why Biden's governing position is different from his campaigning one about welcoming people fleeing their countries, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the administration "need(s) some time" to fix "a process that is broken." And Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has adopted the prior administration's rhetoric. In a House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, he called the Title 42 expulsion policy "a public health imperative," even as Covid cases are decreasing.

Fact check: Biden's speech had an estimated 26.9 million viewers

  Fact check: Biden's speech had an estimated 26.9 million viewers The president’s first address to Congress had 26.9 million viewers, not 11.6 million as claimed in a social media post.An April 29 Facebook post from James T. Harris, a conservative radio host and social media personality, lists television ratings for five past presidential addresses — four from former President Donald Trump and one from Biden. The post says Biden’s address to Congress had only 11.6 million viewers, compared to 37.2 million viewers for Trump’s 2020 State of the Union speech.

The Biden administration understands full well that restoring trust in a science-focused government authority is absolutely essential to defeating the pandemic. The United States is awash in conspiracy theories falsely claiming that government and powerful interests are using lies about public health to gain power and trample rights. So we are especially astonished that the President has continued to use a policy based on a lie about public health at the borders to trample the rights of asylum seekers.

The administration cannot expect the American people to trust them if it follows the science on issues of masks, vaccines and social distancing, and then uses nonsense public health justifications to turn away potential asylum seekers at the border. Indeed, leading epidemiologists and public health experts have repeatedly called on the CDC to revoke its order and "restore its position as a trusted source of objective, reliable, scientific information for the American public."

Political posturing may be to blame. If so, the administration has embarked on a fool's errand. As AP-NORC polling on this issue attests, trying to win over nativists with a "tough" immigration policy is winning the President few new friends, and he is baffling old ones in the process.

Fortunately, the United States does not need to recommit to this illegal and cruel policy.

If at this point in his presidency, Biden doesn't have a plan to restore access to asylum and manage public health at the border, it's time for things to change.

Fact check: Video of Biden discussing Jesus, the American Revolution and airports is missing context

  Fact check: Video of Biden discussing Jesus, the American Revolution and airports is missing context A video purports to show Biden making a confusing statement about Jesus, the Revolutionary War and airports. The full video shows it is misleading.One recent meme plucks one sentence from a speech to take aim at Biden's mental prowess.

The administration should quickly finalize the reviews called for in a February 2 executive order to ensure that our asylum policies are always consistent with US law and treaty commitments.

Building on that, the administration should unequivocally revoke all the rules, regulations and policies the Trump administration used to rig asylum adjudications, exacerbate case backlogs and separate families, according to an analysis from Human Rights First.

They should follow the recommendations of public health experts to safeguard public health and follow US laws to protect asylum seekers. These include enforcing social distancing, using masks and allowing asylum seekers to shelter at homes of family members while their asylum claims are being adjudicated rather than be locked in dangerously unhealthy congregate detention facilities.

As Covid-19 spreads through close contact, the administration needs to modify border processing to minimize delays and avoid dense groups of people. They must ramp up the capacity to test anyone who has symptoms, has been exposed to the virus, has been in a congregate setting, or as otherwise required by the CDC or other medical guidance.

In fact, we know that detention of asylum seekers isn't necessary. Research from the American Immigration Council indicates most immigrants who are released show up for their hearings without being detained. Adults and families should be allowed to shelter in place in their new American communities while unaccompanied minors should enter Health and Human Services custody until being released to their US-based sponsors. The administration has indicated it is serious about taking on the prison-industrial complex, and immigration detention is a good place to start.

To the Biden administration's credit, serious headway was made against the pandemic in the first 100 days, as more than 220 million vaccine doses were provided. This was achieved because the President believes in science and listens to public health experts.

But the use of Title 42 to turn away migrants is based on junk science and its invocation last year was rooted in xenophobia. Biden must repeal this order now to uphold his claims that his administration's decisions will always be based on science and respect for law and human rights.

Biden and his aviators greet queen on a sunny afternoon .
WINDSOR, England (AP) — President Joe Biden and his aviator sunglasses met Queen Elizabeth II on bright Sunday afternoon. The queen hosted the president and first lady Jill Biden at Windsor Castle, her royal residence near London. Biden flew to London after wrapping up his participation in a three-day summit of leaders of the world's wealthy democracies in Cornwall, in southwestern England. He arrived at the castle aboard the presidential helicopter and was ferried to the queen in a black Range Rover.

usr: 1
This is interesting!