•   
  •   
  •   

US States appeal dismissal of suit against U.S. archivist for refusing to certify ERA ratification

01:11  29 september  2022
01:11  29 september  2022 Source:   politico.com

Lawyer pleads guilty to involvement in Capitol riot after he was identified through TikTok videos

  Lawyer pleads guilty to involvement in Capitol riot after he was identified through TikTok videos 66-year-old David Johnston from Summerville, South Carolina, pleaded guilty to his role in the Capitol riot and was charged alongside his neighbor.The conviction was related Bannon's refusal to comply with the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021. A jury found him guilty on two counts, each of which carry a maximum sentence of one year in prison and a $100,000 fine. His sentencing is set for October 21.

Nevada and Illinois are appealing a U.S. District Court’s dismissal of their suit against the U.S. archivist, who the states are suing for refusing to publish and certify their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.

The U.S. archivist has declined to certify the amendment after finding the congressional deadline to be valid. © Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo The U.S. archivist has declined to certify the amendment after finding the congressional deadline to be valid.

The states are seeking to have the ERA published as part of the Constitution, but their call comes decades past Congress’ 1979 deadline for ratification of the amendment — which was passed in 1972 and is intended to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. The attorneys general for the states contend that the amendment has been fully ratified, as three-quarters of U.S. states have now voted to make it the 28th Amendment. But the U.S. archivist has declined to certify the amendment after finding the congressional deadline to be valid.

Explained: Is The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Suit the Best of All Franchises?

  Explained: Is The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Suit the Best of All Franchises? Andrew Garfield's The Amazing Spider-Man 2 suit ranked high among fans' favorites in any Spidey franchise. Is it the best?When it comes to The Amazing Spider-Man and The Amazing Spider-Man 2, they stood up for their favorite duology and backed those movies to others who thought they were the weakest link of the franchise, and thought Garfield was “too cool” just because he knew how to skateboard and actually stood up to bully Flash Thompson. Then, everything changed in Spider-Man: No Way Home, when Ned (Jacob Batalon) and MJ (Zendaya) conjured a Doctor Strange-style portal leading to Garfield and Maguire stepping through into the MCU.

The plaintiffs on Wednesday morning appealed the March 2021 dismissal of their suit, which had included Virginia before the state dropped out of the litigation, at the U.S. Court of Appeals. The states argued that the publication of the law would have “meaningful practical consequences,” even though both sides agree the archivist’s certification wouldn’t determine if the amendment was legally valid. Jane Notz, the plaintiffs’ attorney, said that if the amendment is published, certified and consequently officially added to the Constitution and statutes at large, it will then be admissible in court as evidence.

“People will be more likely to take advantage of the right that our states have sought to secure for them,” Notz argued. “And in addition, that other states and the federal government that may not have brought their laws into compliance with the amendment will be encouraged to do so.”

Hae Min Lee's Brother to Appeal Release of 'Serial' Subject Adnan Syed

  Hae Min Lee's Brother to Appeal Release of 'Serial' Subject Adnan Syed Lee's family has complained of being blindsided by the court's vacating of Syed's 2000 murder conviction.Steven Kelly, attorney for Young Lee, on Wednesday signaled he would appeal a judge's decision last week to vacate Syed's murder conviction after serving 23 years in prison. Syed was sentenced to life in prison in 2000 for the murder of Lee, his high school classmate and ex-girlfriend in the Baltimore area. While Syed's release was hailed by his supporters, Lee's family has complained about the proceedings.

The District Court in March 2021 had dismissed the plaintiffs’ case on the grounds that the states had missed Congress’ deadline for ratification, but also because they failed to show the archivist’s refusal to certify the amendment had caused them any concrete injury, specifically since the archivist’s publication has no legal effect. Notz argued on Wednesday that the injury the states suffer is that “our ratifications are not being given their intended effect.”

“The harm from the lack of publication is the fact that our states ratified the amendment in anticipation that it would be recognized as legitimate. And due to the archivist's inaction, our purpose in ratifying the amendment is not being served,” Notz said.

The plaintiffs also argued that the 1979 deadline Congress set for ratification was “unconstitutional,” since it was written in the proposing clause of the amendment and not the actual text. Notz said that Article V of the Constitution supports the argument that “Congress is free to propose amendments without interfering with the states’ ability to ratify amendments,” and therefore the deadline in the proposing clause of the amendment is unenforceable against the states.

“The framers intended that the states and Congress would be co-equal participants,” Notz said.

The defense for former Archivist David Ferriero, who had declined to publish the amendment, on Wednesday urged the Appeals Court to dismiss the case, arguing that the certification is “a ministerial act that has no substantive application.” Representing the defense, Sarah Harrington — the deputy assistant attorney general for civil appellate — also denied that the states had any injury that would be redressed by the archivist’s proclamation.

“They talk about practical effects, they don’t really talk about what those practical effects are,” Harrington said. “They just sort of vaguely wave at practical consequences that might follow from a certification. But nothing legal follows from a certification.”

After dismissing Baldwin Park, West Covina suits in deadly chase case, judge does same for state .
Oct. 1—LOS ANGELES — Having already dismissed the cities of Baldwin Park and West Covina as defendants in a lawsuit brought by relatives of a Covina couple killed during a police pursuit, a judge has now done the same with the state of California. The plaintiffs, all family members of the late Edward Louie Contreras and Gracie Contreras, have alleged the negligent actions of three police agencies and the driver they were trying to pull over led to the 2019 deaths in West Covina. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Daniel M.

usr: 1
This is interesting!