•   
  •   
  •   

US Supreme Court kicks off a new term with controversial cases – and a new justice

22:41  03 october  2022
22:41  03 october  2022 Source:   usatoday.com

Supreme Court starts new term in political spotlight, tilted right

  Supreme Court starts new term in political spotlight, tilted right An empowered conservative majority of the Supreme Court begins a new term next week replete with cases that could reshape how the country considers social issues such as race in elections and higher education, after decisions from the last term brought the justices to the forefront of the nation’s politics. The justices will hear arguments […] The post Supreme Court starts new term in political spotlight, tilted right appeared first on Roll Call.

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court returned to work Monday with a courtroom reopened to the public, a new and historic justice on the far end of the bench and little sign of the raging national debate over abortion it set off only three months ago.

After more than two years of hearing oral arguments remotely or in a mostly empty courtroom because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the nine justices faced a packed crowd as they took their tall, black chairs – most of them shifting seats based on seniority to accommodate the arrival of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Before the justices emerged,, the court announced they had added nine cases to a docket already full of contentious issues such as race-conscious college admissions and LGBTQ rights. Among the new cases was a challenge to the legal immunity that shields social media firms like Twitter from lawsuits over user-generated content – a protection that has drawn bipartisan criticism.

Abortion ruling intensifies fight over state supreme courts

  Abortion ruling intensifies fight over state supreme courts Surrounded by states with abortion bans that took effect after Roe v. Wade fell, Illinois is one of the few places where the procedure remains legal in the Midwest. Abortion-rights supporters are worried that might not last. Their concern is shared in at least a half-dozen states, and this year it's not just about state legislatures. In Illinois, Democrats hold a supermajority, and the governor, a Democrat, is expected to win reelection. Instead, Republicans could be on the verge of winning control of the Illinois Supreme Court, where Democrats currently hold a 4-3 majority.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Guide: A look at the key cases and questions pending before the nation's high court

Themes: Supreme Court to grapple with race, elections in new term as battle over abortion lingers

Jackson: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson formally welcomed to a Supreme Court she will help to shape

Yet the court declined to take up a number of other controversies. It turned away an appeal from Michael Lindell, a prominent supporter of former President Donald Trump and the founder of MyPillow, who is fighting a $1.3 billion defamation suit over false allegations about the 2020 election. And it declined to review the federal ban on bump stocks, a device that lets a shooter fire a semi-automatic rifle more rapidly.

Supreme Court to revisit whether Alabama legislature violated Voting Rights Act

  Supreme Court to revisit whether Alabama legislature violated Voting Rights Act The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Merrill v. Milligan on Tuesday, a case over whether Alabama's 2021 congressional redistricting map violates the Voting Rights Act. A federal judge in January ordered the state to draw a new map that includes two majority-black districts, holding that the state's original plan, which only held one such district out of the state's seven, was likely in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which disallows voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race.

As usual, the court offered no explanation for why it took or denied the cases it did.

Other than tighter-than-normal security, there was little sign of the tension that gripped the nation over the summer following the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade – an outcome that polls show resulted in a nosedive in the court's approval rating and led to a rare debate among a few of the justices over how the public perceives their work. Anger about the decision prompted critics on the left to question the court's legitimacy.

Only 47% of Americans said they had a "great deal" or "fair amount" of trust in the high court, a 20-percentage point drop from 2020 and a 7-percentage point drop from the previous year, according to a Gallup poll last month.

Though the Supreme Court will hear a number of culture war cases this term, the arguments Monday focused on a more technical question of environmental law.

Supreme Court welcomes the public again, and a new justice

  Supreme Court welcomes the public again, and a new justice WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is beginning its new term, welcoming the public back to the courtroom and hearing arguments for the first time since issuing a landmark ruling stripping away women’s constitutional protections for abortion. Monday's session also is the first time new Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the court's first Black female justice, will participate in arguments. And the public is back for the first time since the court closed in March 2020 because of the coronavirus pandemic. The court’s overturning of the nearly 50-year-old Roe v.

For nearly two hours the justices debated the scope of the Clean Water Act, the 1972 law that gives the Environmental Protection Agency authority to regulate the "waters of the United States" but that left the definition of that term somewhat ambiguous. For years courts have wrestled with how far the EPA's oversight extends and the latest case deals with a wetland in Idaho that is near Priest Lake in the state's panhandle.

Several members of the 6-3 conservative majority tossed cold water on the standard the EPA uses to determine if such a wetland is subject to federal permitting requirements and oversight. Chief Justice John Roberts summed up the challenge facing the court by noting that water often flows in ways that are difficult to predict or measure: "Water goes everywhere, eventually."

Jackson, the first Black woman to serve on the high court in its history, technically joined her colleagues in June but she took part in her first oral argument Monday. Though she is the least senior justice, she repeatedly jumped in to press the lawyer representing the family that is seeking to develop the property purchased more than a decade ago.

Supreme Court opens new term with murky wetlands dispute and Justice Jackson on the bench

  Supreme Court opens new term with murky wetlands dispute and Justice Jackson on the bench The Supreme Court, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on board as its newest member, opens its nine-month term on Monday by hearing a conservative challenge to the federal government’s authority to regulate wetlands under a landmark environmental protection law. © Provided by NBC News The case marks the debut Supreme Court oral argument for Jackson, the first Black woman to serve on the court. Nominated by President Joe Biden, Jackson was sworn into office over the summer. The oral argument also marks the first time in history that four women justices will sit together on the bench.

"Why is it that your conception of this does not relate in any way to Congress' primary objective?" Jackson asked at one point. "Congress cared about making sure that the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nation's waters was protected."

Damien Schiff, arguing for the family that is fighting the EPA, responded by noting that "no statute pursues its purpose or its objective at all costs."

Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, on the other hand, pressed the government for answers about how a property owner is supposed to know that their land might be covered by the EPA's regulations – absent some clear rule, such as a set distance from a navigable river or lake. Gorsuch suggested he wasn't particularly satisfied with the EPA's answer.

"If the federal government doesn't know, how is a person subject to criminal time in federal prison supposed to know?" Gorsuch asked.

Spillover: Supreme Court's affirmative action cases could affect hiring, employment

Granted: Supreme Court to consider use of race in college admissions

Among the other major issues the court will deal with term: A challenge to the race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard College and the University of North Carolina; a case that questions how much power state legislatures have to set the rules of federal elections and a free speech challenge to a Colorado law that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ people.

'Tu stultus es.' The Onion wades into Supreme Court case with legal argument crafted as parody

  'Tu stultus es.' The Onion wades into Supreme Court case with legal argument crafted as parody The Onion filed an unusual 23-page brief at the Supreme Court this week that captured the attention of court watchers on the opening day of the term.But then again, The Onion is a special kind of amicus curiae.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court kicks off a new term with controversial cases – and a new justice

Biden's trying to expand abortion access through Medicaid, but even blue states aren't using the plan before midterm elections .
President Biden encouraged states to use Medicaid to expand abortion access. But two months in, no states have, and advocates await midterm results.As midterm elections approach, even a Democratic majority in the House and Senate might not be enough to preserve abortion access.

usr: 3
This is interesting!