•   
  •   
  •   

US California judge overturns End of Life Option Law

22:28  16 may  2018
22:28  16 may  2018 Source:   cnn.com

Would recall of Stanford rape case judge threaten the rule of law?

  Would recall of Stanford rape case judge threaten the rule of law? Judge Aaron Persky caused outrage with a short sentence for a convicted sex offender, former Stanford swimmer Brock TurnerToday Persky is making his first on-camera comments since handing down that controversial sentence – his latest attempt to convince an already-skeptical public, reports CBS News correspondent John Blackstone. He has just four weeks left to avoid becoming the first California judge in 86 years kicked off the bench by voters. He became a recall target after he sentenced Turner to six months in the county jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman.

California End of Life Option Act is a law enacted in June 2016 which allows terminally ill adult residents in the state of California to access medical aid in dying by self-administering lethal drugs

A California appeals court has reinstated the End of Life Option Act law , ruling that it can remain in effect, at least temporarily, while opponents’ legal challenges are considered. This means that terminally-ill Californians who meet specific requirements can once again legally obtain life - ending

  California judge overturns End of Life Option Law © Shutterstock

A California superior court judge on Tuesday overturned a 2016 state law that allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill adult patients.

Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia said The End of Life Option Act, which took effect June 9, 2016, was unconstitutional because the Legislature passed it during a special session convened by Gov. Jerry Brown to address health care-related issues.

Groups including the Life Legal Defense Foundation and the American Academy of Medical Ethics filed a lawsuit to overturn the law on the day it took effect. In a separate motion, they argued that medical aid in dying was not related to the stated purpose of the special legislative session that passed the act, explained Alexandra Snyder, executive director of the Life Legal Defense Foundation.

Judge Defends Brock Turner Sentencing In Face of Recall

  Judge Defends Brock Turner Sentencing In Face of Recall "We ask judges to follow the rule of law, not the rule of public opinion," Persky said during a press conference Tuesday.The Santa Clara County Superior Court judge defended himself and his ruling in a press conference in Palo Alto, California, on Tuesday. Persky is facing a recall vote in June over his ruling in the Turner case, which critics claim was unjustly lenient.

California ’s End of Life Option Act requires patients to get approval from two physicians, and mandates a 15-day waiting period between the two An attorney for Compassion & Choices, the group that lobbies for the right-to-die law nationally, said he is hopeful Ottolia’s ruling will be overturned on

A California judge has overturned the state’s law legalizing assisted suicide, ruling it unconstitutional. Riverside Superior Court Judge Daniel Ottolia agreed, holding that “the End of Life Option Act does not fall within the scope of access to healthcare services,” and that it “is not a matter

Ottolia agreed, stating in his decision that the law did not fall within the scope of the special legislative session, Snyder said. He also gave the state attorney general five days to file an emergency writ, a type of appeal, to seek a stay and keep the law in place.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement, "We strongly disagree with this ruling and the State is seeking expedited review in the Court of Appeal."

If the emergency appeal is denied, the law will be immediately struck down.

Many believe that California's End of Life Option was a response, in part, to a viral video of Brittany Maynard, a Californian with terminal brain cancer. Wanting to end her life, the 29-year-old moved to Oregon in June 2014 to take advantage of that state's medical aid-in-dying law. Maynard's family advocated for the law in California and elsewhere.

California will require solar panels on all new homes. That’s not necessarily a good thing.

  California will require solar panels on all new homes. That’s not necessarily a good thing. More solar is not always and everywhere better.Where solar is not suitable, homeowners must have access to a community solar project or receive efficiency upgrades that compensate. (There are some exceptions for buildings in highly shaded areas.

LOS ANGELES — A state judge overturned California 's doctor-assisted suicide law on Tuesday, saying the legislation opening the door to life - ending drugs for The Life Legal Defense Foundation, whose attorneys argued in court Tuesday against the End of Life Option Act, expressed elation.

A California judge has overturned the law the grants terminally ill patients the right to end their lives with a doctor’s help, reigniting an emotional debate over an issue that had seemed long settled. Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia ruled that the Legislature violated the state

A California Department of Public Health report says 191 adults received prescriptions from 173 physicians for medical aid in dying between the law's passage and December 31, 2016. Of those, 111 ingested the prescribed drugs and died; 87.4% were 60 or older, and 83.8% were receiving hospice and/or palliative care.

Compassion & Choices, a nonprofit advocacy group for end-of-life options that made the video featuring Maynard, estimated that 504 California adults had received life-ending drugs from their doctors between the law's passage and June 2017.

The judge's ruling "is not a surprise, as the End of Life Option Act entered review by the legislature through an abnormal path," said Dr. Stephanie Harman, a clinical associate professor in Stanford University's Department of Medicine and a faculty member in the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics.

"We have seen more patients than we initially expected participating in the End of Life Option Act," said Harman, who was not involved in the lawsuit but has written about Stanford Health Care's experiences with the law.

Riverside judge overturns California's doctor-assisted suicide law

  Riverside judge overturns California's doctor-assisted suicide law A Riverside County judge overturned California's physician-assisted suicide law on Tuesday, giving the state attorney general five days to file an appeal to keep the law in place. California's law, which allows terminally ill patients to request lethal medications from their doctors, has been the subject of fierce and emotional debates since it was approved in 2015. The state was the fifth in the nation to legalize the practice.Superior Court Judge Daniel A.

A Riverside County judge overturned California ’s right-to-die law because of a legislative technicality. The California Attorney General has vowed to appeal Signed into law in 2015, California ’s End of Life Option Act went into effect in June 2016. Within six months, 191 terminally ill people requested

A judge has overturned California 's End of Life Option Act, ruling that the state Legislature passed the law in an unconstitutional manner. - A California judge on Tuesday threw out a 2016 state law allowing the terminally ill to end their lives , ruling it was unconstitutionally approved by the Legislature.

She added that Stanford patients have mostly responded positively to the law. Primarily, patients "want to discuss what matters most at the end of their lives and understand what their options are and what will align best with their wishes," she said.

Meanwhile, there's the other side of the equation: physician participation. "Doctors, by the generic polls, have been generally supportive; in practice, very few participate," she said.

Dr. David Stevens, executive director of the American Academy of Medical Ethics, a national organization that has advocated against medically assisted suicide since 1994, said the End of Life Option Act "isn't about giving patients the right to die. This is about giving doctors the right to assist in killing."

He believes that physician-assisted suicide is "dangerous for the health care profession. It destroys trust between the doctor and the patient."

Worse, for patients, "the so-called right to die very quickly becomes the duty to die," Stevens said.

Only a handful of states have authorized medically assisted suicide: California, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, in addition to the District of Columbia.

In California, opponents including Catholic leaders and medical groups defeated a 1992 initiative to legalize aid-in-dying and stalled other bills in the state Legislature. Opponents argue that these laws could lead to coercion and abuse of vulnerable patients.

CNN's Stella Chan contributed to this report.

Chris Paul's Late Heroics and the Warriors' Reliance on Isolations Has Golden State on the Brink .
The Rockets have pushed the Warriors to the brink. Houston won a thrilling Game 5 in the Western Conference finals on Thursday, taking a 3–2 lead over Golden State with a 98–94 win. T he basketball was often ugly, but the finish was intoxicating. Chris Paul scored 20 points in another signature performance, while Kevin Durant scored 29 in a losing effort. And now, for the first time since Game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals, the Warriors are facing elimination in a playoff series.Where to begin after such a crazy game? Let’s start with Paul, who overcame a terrible first half to lead Houston to this win.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!