•   
  •   
  •   

US Supreme Court decision halts Georgia voting rights lawsuit

22:51  12 june  2018
22:51  12 june  2018 Source:   latimes.com

ACLU sues over plans for citizenship question on 2020 census

  ACLU sues over plans for citizenship question on 2020 census Civil rights lawyers have sued the U.S. Commerce Department to stop plans to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The Manhattan federal court lawsuit on behalf of immigrants' rights groups says racial animus was behind a recent announcement that the census will include a citizenship question for the first time since 1950.

WASHINGTON - A federal lawsuit challenging Georgia 's system of removing inactive voters from the registration rolls was formally withdrawn on Tuesday You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience. Supreme Court decision halts Georgia

lawsuit challenging Georgia 's system of removing inactive voters from the registration rolls was formally withdrawn on Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court In a 5-4 decision , the high court held that Ohio is not violating the National Voter Registration Act by sending address-confirmation notices

a large stone building with United States Supreme Court Building in the background: The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to shield a California deputy who killed a 13-year-old carrying a pellet gun.© Dreamstime/TNS/TNS The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to shield a California deputy who killed a 13-year-old carrying a pellet gun.

WASHINGTON - A federal lawsuit challenging Georgia's system of removing inactive voters from the registration rolls was formally withdrawn on Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Ohio's similar voter "purge" policy did not violate federal law.

In a 5-4 decision, the high court held that Ohio is not violating the National Voter Registration Act by sending address-confirmation notices to registered voters when they fail to vote in a federal election - and then eliminating their names from the rolls if they don't respond and fail to vote in the next two federal elections over a four-year period.

Arizona court rules against business that turned away same-sex couple

  Arizona court rules against business that turned away same-sex couple An Arizona appeals court ruled on Thursday that a Phoenix-based calligraphy business cannot refuse service to same-sex couples, upholding the city's anti-discrimination ordinance as constitutional. The ruling from the Arizona Court of Appeals cited a Supreme Court decision handed down Monday that sided with a Colorado baker who refused to create a wedding cake for a gay couple.

The 2013 Supreme Court decision (Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder) striking down the coverage Additionally, Florida reinstated a program to purge voters that had been halted by lawsuits seeking “ Supreme Court Knocks Out Part of Voting Rights Act; Voter ID Now the Law in Texas, AG Says.”

A federal lawsuit challenging Georgia 's system of removing inactive voters from the registration rolls was formally withdrawn on Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Ohio's similar voter "purge" policy did not violate federal law . In a 5-4 decision , the high court held that Ohio is not

The decision reversed a lower court ruling that found Ohio's policy violated the voter-registration law by using non-voting to trigger the confirmation notices.

In Georgia, people who haven't voted or had contact with the elections system for three years are placed on an inactive list and then removed from the rolls altogether if they don't respond to confirmation-of-address notices within 30 days - and then vote in the next two general elections.

Because Georgia's and Ohio's policies are so similar, the Supreme Court's decision in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute "essentially disposes, unfavorably, of our NVRA claim," said Emmet Bondurant, lead attorney for Common Cause Georgia, which had challenged the state's voter roll maintenance efforts along with the Georgia NAACP.

Supreme Court upholds Ohio voter registration purge policy

  Supreme Court upholds Ohio voter registration purge policy The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday revived Ohio's contentious policy of purging infrequent voters from its registration rolls.Load Error

WASHINGTON - A federal lawsuit challenging Georgia 's system of removing inactive voters from the registration rolls was formally withdrawn on Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Ohio's similar voter "purge" policy did not violate federal law .

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday effectively struck down the heart of the Voting Texas announced shortly after the decision that a voter identification law that had been blocked would go into Representative John Lewis of Georgia , center left, and Representative John Conyers Jr. of

Bondurant withdrew the case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta. The filing preserves the right of Common Cause and the NAACP to "challenge the validity of the Georgia purge statue on other grounds in a future case," Bondurant said in an email.

He said the high court's decision could leave several hundred thousand Georgia residents unable to vote in November, Bondurant said.

"After the 2016 election, they purged roughly 400,000 who therefore will not be eligible to vote in 2018 unless they have re-registered, which very few people do," Bondurant said.

Candice Broce, spokesperson for Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, said their office could not immediately confirm Bondurant's claim.

Conservatives argue that fraud by ineligible voters can occur if people who die or move away aren't regularly identified and cleared from the registration rolls as the law requires. But voting rights advocates say the removals disproportionately impact black, Hispanic and poor voters who traditionally vote at lower rates and tend to support Democrats.

Effects of Supreme Court voter roll decision appear limited

  Effects of Supreme Court voter roll decision appear limited A U.S. Supreme Court ruling has cleared the way for states to take a tougher approach to maintaining their voter rolls, but will they? Ohio plans to resume its process for removing inactive voters after it was affirmed in Monday's 5-4 ruling. It takes a particularly aggressive approach that appears to be an outlier among states.Few appear eager to follow."Our law has been on the books. It hasn't changed, and it isn't changing," said Oklahoma Election Board spokesman Bryan Dean.At issue is when a state begins the process to notify and ultimately remove people from the rolls after a period of non-voting.

The Supreme Court of the United States (sometimes colloquially referred to by the acronym SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.

By upholding Ohio's system of removing from the rolls voters who skip elections, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a death blowto a Georgia lawsuit that claimed the state's own "purge" process violated federal federal law .

Kemp, a Republican who's running for governor, cheered the court's decision..

"This ruling affirms that common-sense measures like Georgia's voter-list maintenance statutes, which prevent fraud at the ballot box, are appropriate and necessary to ensure secure, accessible, and fair elections," Kemp said in a statement.

Common Cause and the NAACP filed their lawsuit in 2016, claiming Georgia's policy violated the National Voter Registration Act by unlawfully removing voters simply for not voting. Kemp had maintained that the lawsuit was without merit.

In a December 2015 letter to Common Cause attorneys, state lawyers representing Kemp stressed that voters aren't being removed for not voting. Rather, "a voter is removed because they have not had any contact with election officials in Georgia for a minimum of seven years, and they have not returned a postage prepaid, pre-addressed return card to confirm their residence," the attorneys wrote.

The policy helped fuel a rise in the number of inactive Georgia voters from nearly 714,000 in November 2012 to more than 1.3 million in September 2016. Over the same period, the number of Georgia's registered voters dropped from more than 5.35 million to 5.17 million.

U.S. top court voids Minnesota ban on voter political apparel

  U.S. top court voids Minnesota ban on voter political apparel States cannot completely bar people from wearing T-shirts, buttons or other apparel bearing political messages in polling sites, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in an important free speech decision striking down a Minnesota law as unconstitutional. The court, in the 7-2 ruling, said Minnesota's law, which dates back to 1912, went too far in banning political apparel but left room for states to limit what should be allowed in polling places and what should not. The justices sent the case back down to the lower court.

Supreme Court 's Voting Rights Act Decision . View Full Document ». The decision in Shelby County v. Holder revolves around Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which establishes a "coverage formula" to determine which states and local governments fall under Section 5, and therefore need to

Supreme Court Halts Military Vote Law . By Matthew Clark13504287790001350428779000. While the Supreme Court ’s decision refusing to grant an emergency stay means the laws will not go into President Obama’s lawsuit argued that providing special consideration for the unique challenges

Nearly 552,000 people are currently on Georgia's inactive voter list for a number of different reasons, Broce said.

While Ohio's policy for removing voters is the most restrictive in the nation, Georgia, Oklahoma, Montana, Oregon, Pennsylvania and West Virginia have similar policies they use to maintain accurate registration lists.

Voting rights advocates have expressed concern that other states will use Monday's court decision to begin pruning their rolls more aggressively ahead of the 2018 mid-terms. They say that puts people who historically vote at lower rates at greater risk for being erroneously trimmed from the rolls or declared inactive, which would require them to re-register.

Advocates say those most likely to be affected include low-income people, minorities, disabled voters, young voters, those with language barriers and those who move frequently. Hourly workers who have difficulty making time to vote and active duty service members away for long periods of time could also be negatively affected.

Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau at www.mcclatchydc.com

Justice Department deputy wins Supreme Court case .
The Supreme Court has ruled for the Trump administration in a case about prison terms that was argued by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The justices said in a 5-3 decision Monday that judges need not provide detailed explanations when modifying a prison sentence. The case has limited consequences. The inmate whose appeal the high court decided argued for a term of nine years. Rosenstein pushed for the term the judge imposed, 9 ½ years.Justice Stephen Breyer said in his majority opinion that the brief explanation the judge provided was sufficient.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!