US: Brett Kavanaugh pivots as Supreme Court allows one execution, stops another - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

USBrett Kavanaugh pivots as Supreme Court allows one execution, stops another

23:30  30 march  2019
23:30  30 march  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Justice Kavanaugh to join faculty at George Mason's Scalia Law School

Justice Kavanaugh to join faculty at George Mason's Scalia Law School The news comes five months after Harvard Law School announced that he would not be returning to campus in Spring 2019 to teach his previously scheduled course.

Supreme Court on Thursday night stopped the execution of a Buddhist inmate in Texas because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser by his side, when last But the obvious place to start is new Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh , who seemed to have a change of heart. Kavanaugh on Thursday was the only

© Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh concurred Thursday with the Supreme Court ’s liberal justices that a Buddhist man’s execution should be stopped because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser by his side, but last month he was on the other side when the court

Brett Kavanaugh pivots as Supreme Court allows one execution, stops another© Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh concurred Thursday with the Supreme Court’s liberal justices that a Buddhist man’s execution should be stopped because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser by his side, but last month he was on the other side when the court allowed the execution of a Muslim inmate in Alabama under similar circumstances.

It’s difficult to say with certainty why the Supreme Court on Thursday night stopped the execution of a Buddhist inmate in Texas because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser by his side, when last month it approved the execution of a Muslim inmate in Alabama under the almost exact circumstances.

Supreme Court to hear gerrymandering cases against Democrats, Republicans

Supreme Court to hear gerrymandering cases against Democrats, Republicans The court hears two challenges to redrawn boundaries for congressional districts in North Carolina and Maryland.

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh concurred Thursday with the Supreme Court ’s liberal justices that a Buddhist man’s execution should be stopped because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser by his side, but last month he was on the other side when the court allowed the execution of a Muslim

Brett Kavanaugh pivots as Supreme Court allows one execution , stops another Read more Any violation of policy, community guidelines, copyright law or

But the obvious place to start is new Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, who seemed to have a change of heart.

Kavanaugh on Thursday was the only justice to spell out his reasoning: Texas could not execute Patrick Murphy without his Buddhist adviser in the room because it allows Christian and Muslim inmates to have religious leaders by their sides.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

“In my view, the Constitution prohibits such denominational discrimination,” Kavanaugh wrote.

But Kavanaugh was on the other side last month when Justice Elena Kagan and three other justices declared “profoundly wrong” Alabama’s decision to turn down Muslim Domineque Ray’s request for an imam to be at his execution, making available only a Christian chaplain.

Supreme Court halts execution of Texas inmate seeking to allow Buddhist spiritual adviser in death chamber

Supreme Court halts execution of Texas inmate seeking to allow Buddhist spiritual adviser in death chamber The Supreme Court agreed Thursday night to halt the execution of a Texas inmate, Patrick Henry Murphy, after he argued that the state was refusing to allow his Buddhist spiritual adviser to accompany him into the chamber. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Brett Kavanaugh pivots as Supreme Court allows one execution , stops another The Washington Post Read more Any violation of policy, community guidelines

Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh attends the funeral of former President George H.W. Bush on It’s difficult to say with certainty why the Supreme Court on Thursday night (March 28) stopped the execution of a Buddhist inmate in Texas because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser

“That treatment goes against the Establishment Clause’s core principle of denominational neutrality,” Kagan wrote then.

Kavanaugh and the court’s other conservatives did not address Kagan’s argument, saying only that Ray had brought his challenge too late.

Kavanaugh said in a footnote Thursday he was satisfied with the timing of Murphy’s litigation. But the difference in when Ray and Murphy brought their requests was not substantial.

Some critics of the court wondered if the difference was one of race and religion. Murphy is white and turned to Buddhism in prison. Ray, who was executed within hours of the court’s decision Feb. 7, was black.

But the court in just the last few years has ruled for Muslim petitioners who claimed discrimination: an inmate who was not allowed to grow a short beard because of prison policies, and a woman who was denied a job at Abercrombie & Fitch because of her hijab.

Trump says he is 'saving' Barrett for Ginsburg seat: Axios

Trump says he is 'saving' Barrett for Ginsburg seat: Axios President Trump has reportedly said he is "saving" Judge Amy Barrett of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, according to Axios. Barrett was a popular choice among conservative activists as a candidate to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy before Trump eventually nominated Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Axios reported that Trump has made clear his desire to replace Ginsburg with Barrett since Kennedy's decision to retire, telling people on separate occasions: "I'm saving her for Ginsburg.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred Thursday with the Supreme Court ’s liberal justices that a Buddhist man’s execution should be stopped because he But the obvious place to start is new Justice Brett Kavanaugh , who seemed to have a change of heart. Kavanaugh on Thursday was the only justice to

Supreme Court halts execution of Texas inmate seeking to allow Buddhist spiritual adviser in death chamber. Kavanaugh sworn in as Supreme Court justice. Judge Brett Kavanaugh , President Trump's Kavanaugh is also notable, even among his highly Another source of controversy was his

Ilya Somin, a law professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University and a sharp critic of the court’s decision in Dunn v. Ray, said the most logical explanation is the court was stung by the barrage of criticism it received from the left and the right.

The justices “belatedly realized they had made a mistake; and not just any mistake, but one that inflicted real damage on their and the court’s reputations,” Somin wrote on the Volokh Conspiracy blog.

“Presented with a chance to ‘correct’ their error and signal that they will not tolerate religious discrimination in death penalty administration, they were willing to bend over backwards to seize the opportunity, and not let it slip away.”

Deepak Gupta, a Washington lawyer who argues before the court and called the Ray decision “indefensible,” tweeted: “This is how the Supreme Court tries to erase a very recent and obvious moral error without admitting error. Is the Alabama case materially different? They don’t say.”

It is not clear from the ruling what role Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who were in the majority in the Ray case, played in the Murphy case. They did not join Kavanaugh’s opinion, nor did they note, as Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch did, that they would have allowed the execution to proceed.

Supreme Court justices feuding openly over death penalty

Supreme Court justices feuding openly over death penalty A controversial execution of a Muslim inmate in Alabama appears to have set off a rare public debate between Supreme Court justices over how the death penalty is enforced. Despite Chief Justice John Roberts' oft-stated goal of keeping the Supreme Court above the kinds of conflicts that have crippled the political branches of government, there are times when internal debates between the justices -- and even some sniping -- will seep out.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred Thursday with the Supreme Court ’s liberal justices that a Buddhist man’s execution should be stopped because he was not allowed a spiritual adviser by his side, but last month he was on the other side when the court allowed the execution of a Muslim inmate in

Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred Thursday with the Supreme Court ’s liberal justices that a Buddhist man’s execution should be stopped because he But the obvious place to start is new Justice Brett Kavanaugh , who seemed to have a change of heart. Kavanaugh on Thursday was the only justice to

Somin said he is “fairly confident Alito and Roberts switched” because they did not record themselves as objecting, as Thomas and Gorsuch did.

“In a high-profile case like this, it would be strange for some justices to clearly indicate their dissent, while others who agreed with that stance kept silent and thereby created the impression they agree with the majority,” Somin said in an email.

But that is not always the case, and Kavanaugh plus the dissenters in the Ray case would have been enough to force the outcome in the Murphy case.

The order stayed Murphy’s execution until the court decides to take up the case on its merits or Texas “permits Murphy’s Buddhist spiritual advisor or another Buddhist reverend of the state’s choosing to accompany Murphy in the execution chamber during the execution.”

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed a brief on Murphy’s behalf, said it attempted to disentangle the religious liberty issue from the last-minute attempts to stop executions that irritate the court’s conservative majority.

“This particular appeal does not present a challenge to the constitutionality of the death penalty, nor is it a challenge to Texas’ execution of Murphy,” the brief argues. “This is instead a challenge to the conditions of Murphy’s confinement immediately prior to his execution.”

Becket’s First Amendment argument hinged on a point that often separates the court’s liberals and conservatives.

Ray’s lawyers, and the appeals court that at first held up his execution, said Alabama’s policy of only employing a Christian chaplain and making him the only cleric available at executions violates the prohibition on government endorsement of one religion over another.

Becket and Murphy’s lawyers argued that the constitutional right at issue was the inmate’s ability to practice his religion.

“The right of a condemned person to the comfort of clergy — and the rights of clergy to comfort the condemned — are among the longest-standing and most well-recognized forms of religious exercise known to civilization,” Becket’s brief said.

robert.barnes@washpost.com

Read More

Kavanaugh confirmation was ugly, and things will only get uglier.
Confirming Brett Kavanaugh was the best outcome at the end of a hellish decision tree that left the country with no ideal option. Reasonable people may differ on that. But what seems more obvious: It's all going to get worse. Because everyone is taking the wrong lessons from the Kavanaugh debacle. Let's start with the president. In an interview Saturday night on Fox News Channel's "Justice with Judge Jeanine," President Trump said that he was the one who "evened the playing field" for Kavanaugh when he mocked Christine Blasey Ford at a Mississippi rally the previous week.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!