•   
  •   
  •   

USStricter abortion bans are conservative-led states' gambit to overturn Roe vs. Wade

07:20  12 may  2019
07:20  12 may  2019 Source:   latimes.com

Could a court overturn Maximum Security's DQ in Kentucky Derby? Don't bet on it, lawyers say

Could a court overturn Maximum Security's DQ in Kentucky Derby? Don't bet on it, lawyers say Maximum Security was disqualified at the 2019 Kentucky Derby. The horse's owner made an appeal but it was swiftly denied. Could a court overrule it?

For years, conservatives in Southern and Midwestern states have been passing laws that restrict women's access to abortion : mandating "I think the court is concerned for its very legitimacy." Critics of the abortion bans complain that the race to be the first to challenge Roe vs . Wade is a waste of

Roe v . Wade , 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision issued in 1973 by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of the constitutionality of laws that criminalized or restricted access to. Several states have taken steps to ban abortion outright if the Supreme Court were to ever overturn

ATLANTA - When Republican lawmakers in Alabama weighed a stringent new bill that would outlaw almost all abortions, they did not pretend that it complied with federal law or that it would go into effect anytime soon.

Alabama Lawmakers Vote to Effectively Ban Abortion in the State

Alabama Lawmakers Vote to Effectively Ban Abortion in the State The Alabama Senate approved a measure on Tuesday that would outlaw almost all abortions in the state, setting up a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the case that recognized a woman’s constitutional right to end a pregnancy. 

Roe v . Wade legalized abortion nationwide, and makes state bans unenforceable and unconstitutional. An effort to overturn the ruling Read more: A wave of extreme new abortion bans is part of a larger Republican coordinated attack on Roe v . Wade . Justice Stephen Breyer raised

For years, conservative states have been passing laws that restrict women’s access to abortion . Now they're experimenting with outright bans .

"Yes, it's unconstitutional," state House Rep. Terri Collins, the bill's sponsor, said last week at a hearing. "All our pro-life bills are unconstitutional right now. That's the goal."

For years, conservatives in Southern and Midwestern states have been passing laws that restrict women's access to abortion: mandating women wait as long as 72 hours for the procedure after receiving counseling, banning widely used surgical abortion methods, limiting state Medicaid programs from covering most abortions.

Now they are pursuing a more extreme legal strategy. Emboldened by the rightward tilt of the U.S. Supreme Court, states are passing more severe restrictions and near-total bans in a deliberate attempt to trigger a lawsuit that could push the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision, which recognized a woman's constitutional right to abortion.

Alabama's Abortion Ban Has A Clear Target: Roe v. Wade

Alabama's Abortion Ban Has A Clear Target: Roe v. Wade Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) approved a near-total abortion ban on Wednesdayaimed at the United States Supreme Court and designed to overturn Roe v. Wade,the landmark 1973 decision establishing a woman's right to an abortion underthe U.S. Constitution.Roe v. Wade makes it clear that women have a right to abortion guaranteed bythe 14th Amendment, but the Alabama measure almost universally prohibitsabortions. Doctors who perform an abortion are to be subject to at least 10 and as many as 99 years in prison. The only exception in the legislation is if a pregnancy puts a woman’s life at risk. The law is set to become effective in six months.

Anti- abortion activists have been pushing these restrictive state laws for years in a concerted, national effort to get the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v . Wade . WASHINGTON — Over the past few months, state after state has introduced or passed laws that would essentially ban abortion

If the court overturns the 1973 ruling, four states have laws that would ban abortions almost immediately. It is estimated that more than 20 states could move to implement bans if Roe v . Wade were overturned . Former federal prosecutor and constitutional law expert Dan Burns said a possible

Last week, Georgia followed Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio to become the fourth state this year to outlaw abortion once a fetal "heartbeat" is detected, typically at around six weeks - before most women know they are pregnant.

Georgia's new law gives an unborn child - an embryo smaller than a coffee bean that has not developed a brain or organs that allow it to survive outside the womb - the status of "a class of living, distinct persons" that deserves "full legal recognition."

Alabama, meanwhile, is on the verge of passing another radical abortion law, the Alabama Human Life Protection Act, which bans abortion from the moment of conception. Any doctor who terminates a pregnancy in any circumstance, other than to save a woman's life, could face up to 99 years in prison.

"We've never seen states passing near-total abortion bans," said Elizabeth Nash, senior state issues manager at the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit research group that supports abortion rights. "This is new and different."

Abortion ban reaction: Democrats erupt, Republicans stay quiet as both sides see an impact in the 2020 election

Abortion ban reaction: Democrats erupt, Republicans stay quiet as both sides see an impact in the 2020 election The Democratic presidential contenders cast the nation’s strictest ban as a severe blow to women’s rights, while Republicans on the ballot in 2020 did not want to talk about it

Abortion would be automatically illegal in six states if Roe vs . Wade were overturned . "Trigger laws" date back to the year Roe was decided, and one or two conservative states have historically Liberal states are also preparing for a post- Roe v Wade world, passing laws that would maintain or

State legislatures in Iowa, Louisiana and Mississippi have advanced strict limits on abortion that some lawmakers hope can trigger a successful challenge to the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision.

Legislators in red states have become more willing to experiment, in part because they think there's a greater chance an abortion ban could be upheld now that the Supreme Court has a solid conservative majority after President Donald Trump's appointment of Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh.

They also calculate that in an era of intense political and cultural partisanship, rolling back abortion rights will carry less of a political penalty.

"There's more of a sense in some states that you can energize antiabortion voters and prevail at the polls by passing these laws even if a lot of other people might find them to be too extreme," said Mary Ziegler, a professor of law at Florida State University and author of "Beyond Abortion: Roe v. Wade and the Battle for Privacy."

At the same time, lawmakers in a growing number of Democratic-controlled states are clamoring to shore up abortion rights. Last week, Vermont passed a bill that would enshrine a right to "personal reproductive autonomy" in the state constitution.

In January, New York passed the Reproductive Health Act, which affirmed a "fundamental right" to abortion, allowed licensed professionals other than doctors to perform the procedures, and expanded access to abortions after the 24th week of pregnancy if "necessary to protect the patient's life or health."

Abortion Opponents Think They’re Winning. Have They Set Themselves Up to Fail?

Abortion Opponents Think They’re Winning. Have They Set Themselves Up to Fail? Alabama, Georgia and the fetal personhood trap.

Even as legislators pass ever more extreme state laws, abortion remains legal across the U.S. All the severe abortion bans violate Roe - which prevents states from restricting abortion before the fetus is viable, usually about 23 or 24 weeks of pregnancy - and are likely to be subject to long, drawn-out legal challenges.

On Friday, a federal judge struck down Kentucky's six-week ban. U.S. District Judge Joseph H. McKinley Jr. ruled the law was unconstitutional - that it would create a "substantial obstacle" to a woman's right to an abortion. Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin, a Republican, vowed to appeal.

For the architects of the new abortion bans, the ultimate goal is to get the Supreme Court to look at the moral question of when human life begins.

"There's a conversation that has to take place," said state Rep. Rich Wingo, a Republican who worked with the Alabama Pro-Life Coalition to draft the Alabama bill.

"We all know Roe says that an unborn child is not a person, thus it's not protected by the Constitution of the United States," Wingo said. "But in 1973, there wasn't 3-D or 4-D imaging; there wasn't fetal monitoring; the ultrasound was somewhat archaic."

"The bottom line is we believe that life begins at conception, we believe that there is life in the womb, and we have evidence of that from these new technologies," he added.

Post-Roe America Won’t Be Like Pre-Roe America. It Will Be Worse.

Post-Roe America Won’t Be Like Pre-Roe America. It Will Be Worse. The new abortion bans are harsher than the old ones.

Many advocates for women's reproductive rights see the issue of fetal personhood as a red herring.

"Even if the fetus or embryo is a person in the full legal and moral sense, it does not follow that it has the right to use another's body for its development," said Laurie Shrage, a professor of philosophy at Florida International University.

"Drawing the line between permissible and impermissible abortions involves balancing a number of important interests and rights - especially a woman's reproductive autonomy versus preserving a fetal human life," she added. "There is no perfect way to draw this line."

Unlike the Bible-bashing sermons of past decades, many abortion opponents in conservative Southern states talk of how medical science and technology allow for more understanding of human development in its earliest stages.

They also use the language of equal rights.

The Alabama bill, for example, frames the rights of unborn children as an issue of human equality - a natural step from the principle that "All men are created equal" and a continuation of movements against slavery and even for women's suffrage.

"Abortion advocates speak to women's rights," the bill states, "but they ignore the unborn child, while medical science has increasingly recognized the humanity of the unborn child."

Many who uphold abortion rights insist that such complex moral questions cannot be solved by politicians.

"This question about when life begins is a deeply personal belief," said Staci Fox, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood Southeast. "For some, it's based on religion. For some, it's based on science. These issues are really between women and their families and their faith and their doctors, not between them and their politicians."

‘This is a Wave’: Inside the Network of Anti-Abortion Activists Winning Across the Country

‘This is a Wave’: Inside the Network of Anti-Abortion Activists Winning Across the Country State after state is passing sweeping abortion restrictions this year, from Alabama’s near total abortion ban, to Ohio’s ban after a fetal heartbeat is detected, to Utah’s ban after a pregnancy reaches 18 weeks. Already, eight states have passed laws that could challenge federal protections for abortion, with more on the way, prompting jubilation on the right and fear on the left. The laws may appear to present a united front and a coordinated political campaign. Instead they reflect a sustained effort by a network of disparate activists, each with their own strategy honed over decades of work.

Across the United States, a majority of Americans generally support abortion in the early stages of pregnancy. While 6 in 10 Americans say abortion "should generally be legal" during the first three months, according to a 2018 Gallup poll, support for abortion dwindles to 28% for the second trimester and 13% for the third trimester.

Legal experts on both sides of the debate agree that the Supreme Court is likely to move slowly.

"It's going to be difficult for the Supreme Court to make an outright reversal of Roe," said Randall Marshall, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama, which has vowed to challenge the state's bill if it passes.

"If the court were suddenly to reverse the last 40-plus years of its cases, then it looks less like an independent judicial branch than the political arm of whoever's in power," he said. "I think the court is concerned for its very legitimacy."

Critics of the abortion bans complain that the race to be the first to challenge Roe vs. Wade is a waste of millions of taxpayer dollars that could be used to address cash-strapped schools, children's health care programs, rural hospitals and prisons.

Politicians who advocate for the life of the unborn child, though, say they are following the morally righteous path, no matter the financial costs or legal challenges.

"Our job is to do what is right, not what is easy," Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, said at a signing ceremony Tuesday at the Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta. "We are called to be strong and courageous, and we will not back down. We will always continue to fight for life."

In signing the law, Kemp fulfilled a campaign promise to his conservative base, but it is still a risky political strategy in an increasingly diversifying state where Republican power is slowly receding and Democrats have become increasingly competitive.

Mississippi judge who blocked 15-week abortion ban hears arguments on fetal heartbeat law

Mississippi judge who blocked 15-week abortion ban hears arguments on fetal heartbeat law Mississippi's fetal heartbeat law which bans abortions after approximately six weeks could be blocked or upheld by Judge Carlton Reeves.

Even in the South, public opinion on abortion varies by state. While 59% of Alabama voters supported a constitutional amendment last year declaring it state policy to recognize and support the rights of unborn children, support is more tepid in Georgia. A recent poll suggested that 49% of Georgians oppose the six-week ban and 44% support it.

While the Georgia law makes exceptions for some cases of rape or incest, the sponsors of the Alabama law make an exception only for preventing a serious health risk to the mother.

Exempting abortions in cases of rape or incest, they argue, creates a knotty question for the Supreme Court: Is it OK to end a pregnancy if the mother is a victim of rape or incest? Instead, they advocate presenting an outright ban to the Supreme Court and tweaking the finer details later.

Last week, the Alabama Senate dissolved into a chaotic shouting match when its leaders removed an amendment that would permit exemptions for rape or incest - without allowing for a full roll call vote that would show the public how each senator had voted.

Senators postponed the debate until Tuesday. Yet not even the bill's opponents doubted that it would ultimately be signed into law.

"I know you all are for this bill, and I know this bill is going to pass," said Sen. Vivian Davis Figures, a Democrat, as she urged her Senate colleagues - more than three-quarters of them Republican men - to hold a full and transparent vote.

"You all are going to get your way," she said, "but at least treat us fairly and do it the right way."

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Read More

Mississippi judge who blocked 15-week abortion ban hears arguments on fetal heartbeat law.
Mississippi's fetal heartbeat law which bans abortions after approximately six weeks could be blocked or upheld by Judge Carlton Reeves.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 3
This is interesting!