US: Legal experts: California reporter did not commit crime - - PressFrom - US

USLegal experts: California reporter did not commit crime

11:00  23 may  2019
11:00  23 may  2019 Source:

Long Island Judge Overturns Conviction Of Man Who Spent 33 Years Behind Bars For Crime He Didn’t Commit

Long Island Judge Overturns Conviction Of Man Who Spent 33 Years Behind Bars For Crime He Didn’t Commit He confessed to murder and served more than three decades behind bars, all for a crime, it turns out, he didn't commit.

A California jury was apparently convinced by the defense argument that the shooting was Researchers found it does not . If anything, the opposite is true: Violent crime appears to fall when Trump disputed those findings during his White House event Friday but he did not offer evidence to

Legal Reporter Says It's Complicated "There is not going to be a neat ending," New Yorker writer Legal Reporter Says It's Complicated 37:54. So if you tell the FBI director to go easy on someone whom you know has committed a crime , that is potentially obstruction of justice in and of itself.

Legal experts: California reporter did not commit crime© The Associated Press In this photo taken Tuesday, May 21, 2019, from left, David Snyder, an attorney with the First Amendment Coalition, attorney Duffy Carolan, and Thomas Burke, attorney for freelance journalist Bryan Carmody, talk outside a courtroom before a hearing in San Francisco. Advocates of the press pushed back against a San Francisco police chief who said a freelance journalist had "crossed the line" in conspiring to steal a police report, saying that it is not a crime to disclose a public record. Carolan, who is representing several media organizations siding with the independent reporter, says that the public has constitutional rights to access public records. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)

SAN FRANCISCO — Media law experts pushed back against the San Francisco police chief, who said a freelance journalist allegedly conspired to steal a police report, saying that it is not a crime to disclose a public record.

'The case is closed!': Trump continues to claim vindication after Mueller speaks

'The case is closed!': Trump continues to claim vindication after Mueller speaks President Donald Trump on Wednesday continued to claim vindication in the Russia investigation moments after special counsel Robert Mueller gave his first public comments on the probe. "Nothing changes from the Mueller Report," Trump tweeted. "There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed! Thank you." require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The Southern California District with nearly 4,900 cases; New Mexico with nearly 4,000 cases and The misrepresentation of comparisons in who commits crimes between illegal immigrants, legal U.S Only the states of Texas and Florida do illegal immigrants commit less crimes than their legal

Reporters rifled through documents, picked up baby toys and thumbed through family photos, all live on television. FBI: not a crime scene. Some questioned how agents could have finished searching the “We did a very thorough search and took our time and completed it,” she said.

San Francisco attorney Duffy Carolan, who represents several media organizations siding with the independent reporter, said the public has constitutional rights to public records.

"The impact of trying to criminalize disclosure of public records, whether or not it violated internal policy or practice, will have a profound effect on public employees' willingness to disclose public records," she said. "It would have a chilling effect."

A battle between the press and police is playing out in politically liberal San Francisco after police raided the home and office of Bryan Carmody earlier this month in an effort to uncover the source of a leaked police report into the unexpected death of the city's former elected public defender.

This obscure 1973 memo kept Mueller from considering a Trump indictment

This obscure 1973 memo kept Mueller from considering a Trump indictment The obscure government memorandum that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III says prevented him from pursuing criminal charges against President Donald Trump points at one avenue for dealing with a misbehaving president: impeachment. During his first public remarks since taking over the Russia investigation two years ago, Mueller made clear that he never considered indicting Trump, regardless of the findings of his investigation, because a 1973 Office of Legal Counsel memorandum prevented him from doing so. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

" Did I say aliens commit more crimes than U.S. citizens? I didn’t say that," Thomas Homan, acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told reporters on Wednesday. In a handouts given to reporters Wednesday, the White House offered a slew of statistics about enforcement.

Trump says "virtually every legal expert " believes Clinton committed a crime . So as a legal website, we had to fact check this one. What she did is a very dangerous thing for our country and here she is running,” he told reporters .

A journalist who actively and meaningfully participated in unlawfully acquiring information could be successfully prosecuted for a crime, said David Snyder, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition. Hypothetical examples include a reporter providing passwords or hacking instructions to allow someone on the inside to unlawfully access a database.

But Snyder emphasized that a police report is "not a confidential, legally protected document" and its disclosure and publication is lawful.

San Francisco Sgt. Michael Andraychak said Wednesday that the report was not a public record and that state law protects crime reports when "disclosure would endanger the successful completion of the investigation or a related investigation."

But media experts said although the law allows police to keep reports secret, it does not require police to do so and it is perfectly lawful to release the information. Police also did not raid the office of a reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle who obtained the same report independently of Carmody. The newspaper has said it did not pay for the report.

Trump attacks Mueller as a 'true never-Trumper'

Trump attacks Mueller as a 'true never-Trumper' Impeachment is a "dirty filthy disgusting word," Trump added as impeachment talk ramped up after Mueller's Wednesday statement.

“ Do the crimes committed by released illegal immigrants number in the thousands, yes they do .” But we are looking at a claim from Trump about the comparison of crime rates of immigrants in the country illegally and native-born residents. “If you are asking if illegals commit crimes out of their proportion

2) But those legal requirements of intentional conduct regarding classified information do not exist in the language of 18 U.S. C . A § 793(f), which is a felony ANALYSIS: Hillary Did Not Commit a Crime Based on What We Know Today. Ex-intelligence analyst charged with leaks to reporter .

Police used a sledgehammer to try to get into Carmody's home and office and cuffed him for hours as they searched and subsequently removed dozens of cameras, cellphones, computers and other equipment used to gather news.

San Francisco Police Chief William Scott acknowledged at a press conference Tuesday that the raids looked bad. It was his first full remarks more than week after the May 10 raids.

"We believe that that contact and that interaction went across the line," Scott said Tuesday, referring to Carmody's efforts to acquire the report. "It went past just doing your job as a journalist."

Reporters and other First Amendment organizations are asking a San Francisco judge to revoke search warrants that authorized the raids and to unseal the materials submitted in support of them. Because the warrants are under seal, it's not known what information police provided to support the search warrants, or whether they disclosed to the judges that Carmody is a journalist.

Carmody said he passively received the report from a source and that he did not pay for the report — though doing so would not have been a crime, the experts said. Still, Scott said the journalist "crossed the line," motivated by profit or animosity toward the late public defender, Jeff Adachi. An autopsy found Adachi died Feb. 22 of a mixture of cocaine and alcohol, compromising an already bad heart.

He said, he said: Are Mueller and Barr on same page about not charging Trump?

He said, he said: Are Mueller and Barr on same page about not charging Trump? Some observers have cited an apparent contradiction in statements by the special counsel and the attorney general.

The California Court Reporters Board, within the Department of Consumer Affairs, is responsible for the oversight of the court reporting profession, which includes testing, licensing, and disciplining court reporters . The California Court Reporters Board requires candidates for court reporter licensure to

National political enterprise and accountability reporter covering money and influence in politics. What do the data tell us about the criminal threat of immigrants? Data on immigrants and crime are incomplete, but a range of studies show there is no evidence immigrants commit more crimes than

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that journalists are free to report on newsworthy information contained in stolen documents or illegally intercepted telephone communications obtained from a third party who violated the law, said Carolan, the attorney.

The court may have ruled differently had the journalists encouraged or aided in the unlawful interception of the call, she said. But that has nothing to do with a reporter who encourages a public official or public employee to provide a public record.

"That is what reporters do every day," Carolan said.

Snyder, of the First Amendment Coalition, said the police chief's comments suggest the police employee may have accessed an unauthorized system to obtain the report.

"Would an offer by the journalist to pay the source to break the law be enough? Maybe. It would depend on the circumstances," he said.

"I don't think it matters what Carmody's motivations were. The question is: Was his conduct protected by the First Amendment? And all the facts I've seen thus far show it was," he said.

Scott has not provided details of the investigation other than to say that Carmody was an active participant in acquiring a police record, which the reporter then sold to three television news outlets as part of a news package that included information obtained from interviews and video footage from the scene of Adachi's death.

Carmody has not responded to requests for comment, although he posted on Twitter on Wednesday the hashtag #journalismisnotacrime. A GoFundMe campaign has raised more than $15,000 for the veteran reporter to replace his equipment.

California's shield law specifically protects journalists from search warrants. The Associated Press is among dozens of news organizations siding with Carmody and seeking to submit a friend-of-the-court brief.

Read More

Bill Maher Goes Off on Robert Mueller: Is Trump ‘a Criminal’?.
On Friday night, Bill Maher returned from a brief Memorial Day break to entertain his Resistance™ audience on Real Time. 

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!