•   
  •   
  •   

USBarr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but Gives No Details

03:35  09 july  2019
03:35  09 july  2019 Source:   nytimes.com

Democrats celebrate announcement on citizenship census question

Democrats celebrate announcement on citizenship census question Top Democrats on Capitol Hill are celebrating the Trump administration's announcement on Tuesday that it will forgo adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Critics have pushed back on the White House's efforts to ensure its inclusion for months, arguing it had the potential to cause noncitizens and anyone else in their households to skip filling out the question or partaking in the census altogether, which could lead to an inaccurate count.

Mr. Barr said that the Trump administration would soon reveal how it plans to add the question , but he would not detail potential legal pathways. The main challenge, he said , would be adding the question without disrupting the census . At a news conference later on Monday after touring a federal prison in

[Mr. Barr said a legal path to census citizenship question exists , but he gave no details .] Stanton Jones, a lawyer with the firm of Arnold & Porter who helped represent opponents of the question in a federal lawsuit in Manhattan, accused the Trump administration of waging a multimillion-dollar court

Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but Gives No Details© Travis Dove for The New York Times Attorney General William P. Barr toured a federal prison in Edgefield, S.C., on Monday.

EDGEFIELD, S.C. — President Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr began working to find a way to place a citizenship question on the 2020 census just after the Supreme Court blocked its inclusion last month, Mr. Barr said on Monday, adding that he believes that the administration can find a legal path to incorporating the question.

“The president is right on the legal grounds. I felt the Supreme Court decision was wrong, but it also made clear that the question was a perfectly legal question to ask, but the record had to be clarified,” Mr. Barr said in an interview. He was referring to the ruling that left open the possibility that the citizenship question could be added to the census if the administration came up with a better rationale for it.

DOJ ordered to find ways to include citizenship question on 2020 census, official says

DOJ ordered to find ways to include citizenship question on 2020 census, official says A lawyer with the Department of Justice said Wednesday that agency officials have been ordered to determine whether there is a way the administration can include a citizenship question on the 2020 census, hours after a tweet from President Trump raised confusion over the status of the question.Joseph Hunt, an assistant attorney general with DOJ's civil division, said Wednesday that the department has been "instructed to examine whether there is a path forward, consistent with the Supreme Court's decision, that would allow us to include the citizenship question on the census." "We think there may be a legally available path under the Supreme Court's decision.

Attorney General William Barr said he expects to find a legal way to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census , less than a week after the Justice Department said it would drop The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing whether a question regarding citizenship can be included in the 2020 census .

Less than 3 weeks after the Supreme Court said no, Attorney General Bill Barr says he has a plan to get the citizenship question included on the 2020 census . Executive Director of U.S. Programs of the Human Rights Watch, Nicole Austin-Hillery, and former Congressman David Jolly join Stephanie

“It makes a lot of sense for the president to see if it’s possible that we could clarify the record in time to add the question,” Mr. Barr added.

But he also acknowledged that the career Justice Department lawyers who had worked on the census question had little appetite to continue on the case after Mr. Trump inserted himself into the process. “We’re going to reach a new decision and I can understand if they’re interested in not participating in this phase,” Mr. Barr said. The Justice Department announced a day earlier that it was replacing them, a nearly unheard-of move.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

Taken together, the talks between Mr. Barr and Mr. Trump and the decision to replace the legal team underscore administration officials’ difficulty in adding a citizenship question to the census. Democrats have criticized the pursuit as an effort to reshape the results of the census — which affects the allocation of hundreds of billions of federal dollars each year — to benefit Republicans.

The real problem of Trump's citizenship question

The real problem of Trump's citizenship question The 2020 Census is not Trump's census, it is our census. It is by and for the American people, and it must be carried out without further delay, writes Raul Reyes

Attorney General William Barr said Monday he sees a legal path to adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census , despite a Supreme Court ruling Barr would not detail the administration's plans, though a senior official said President Donald Trump is expected to issue a presidential memorandum

Census clash continues; reaction from former deputy assistant attorney general John Yoo and national security attorney Bradley Moss.

Mr. Barr said that the Trump administration would soon reveal how it plans to add the question, but he would not detail potential legal pathways. The main challenge, he said, would be adding the question without disrupting the census.

At a news conference later on Monday after touring a federal prison in Edgefield, S.C., with Senators Lindsey Graham and Tim Scott, the Republicans who represent the state, Mr. Barr declined to say whether the president would issue an executive order to add the question. It was not clear what such an order would accomplish; the Constitution makes Congress responsible for overseeing the census, not the president, though the administration carries it out.

The Trump administration’s handling of the census has already put Mr. Barr in the cross hairs of House Democrats, who strongly oppose the addition of a citizenship question. And the hostilities may soon spike.

‘A willingness to fight’: Win or lose, Trump’s push for a citizenship question in the Census is red meat for his base

‘A willingness to fight’: Win or lose, Trump’s push for a citizenship question in the Census is red meat for his base While President Trump’s combative strategy has so far yielded mixed results, it nonetheless allows Trump to cast himself as a relentless change agent.

Attorney General William Barr speaks during a tour of a federal prison Monday, July 8, 2019, in Edgefield, S.C. After the tour, Barr said he believes the Trump administration can find a legal path to adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census , but he offered no details .

Attorney General William Barr says he's found a path to legally include the citizenship question on the 2020 census . Ryan Grim, Washington bureau chief for

In a warning shot on Monday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi informed colleagues that she intended to schedule a full House vote “soon” to hold Mr. Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas for documents related to the census question. Ms. Pelosi called the census dispute “essential to who we are as a nation” and asserted that the materials in question would “shed light on the real reason the administration added a citizenship question.”

The House Oversight and Reform Committee, which is investigating the Trump administration’s decision to add the question, voted last month to recommend that the two cabinet officials be held in contempt, mostly along party lines, despite protests from the administration that it was working in good faith to meet the requests.

If the House follows through with a contempt vote on the floor — and no date for a vote has yet been set — it would be empowering the Oversight Committee to take Mr. Barr and Mr. Ross to court to ask a judge to enforce their subpoenas. Doing so is an exceedingly rare step and puts a black mark on both officials’ public records.

Baby No. 3! Mario Lopez's Wife Courtney Mazza Gives Birth

Baby No. 3! Mario Lopez's Wife Courtney Mazza Gives Birth Oh, baby! Mario Lopez announced on Monday, July 8, that his wife, Courtney Lopez (née Mazza), gave birth, welcoming their third child together. Celebrity Babies of 2019: See Which Stars Gave Birth “It’s a BOY!!!!” the Extra host, 45, captioned hospital pics of his infant at the time. “Healthy, beautiful baby boy… Santino Rafael Lopez! Baby & Mom are doing great. Mrs. Lopez came through like a Champ!” View this post on Instagram It’s a BOY!!!!

The House has already threatened to hold Mr. Barr in contempt once over a separate case related to a subpoena for material connected to Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation as special counsel. But in the end, lawmakers struck a deal with the attorney general and voted on a resolution that merely authorized them to go to court to enforce the subpoena rather than formally accusing Mr. Barr of being in criminal contempt.

House Democrats intend to go further this time, formally accusing both officials of criminal defiance of their summons if the administration does not relent beforehand, according to a senior Democratic aide familiar with the plans. Still, the practical outcome could be the same since the Justice Department would almost certainly refuse to bring a criminal case against the men.

The conversations between Mr. Barr and Mr. Trump came amid a series of abrupt reversals on the issue. After the Supreme Court delayed the administration’s effort to add the citizenship question, ruling that its rationale was “contrived,” Mr. Ross and Justice Department lawyers declared the issue all but dead last week in the near term.

Mr. Ross said that the Census Bureau, which the Commerce Department oversees, would focus on conducting “a complete and accurate census” and had begun to print forms that did not include the citizenship question. Justice Department lawyers, who had argued that they faced a strict June 30 cutoff for printing the census forms, also concluded as that deadline passed that the question would have to wait for the next census in another decade.

The real reason for the census debacle? Trump just wants to fight.

The real reason for the census debacle? Trump just wants to fight. Republicans are showing us how to manipulate the census for political gain.

But Mr. Trump, who had been strategizing with Mr. Barr to come up with a way to add the question, overruled Mr. Ross and the lawyers a day later, denouncing their statements as “fake news.”

“We are absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question,” Mr. Trump said on Twitter.

His discussions with Mr. Barr did not appear to make their way to the Commerce Department officials or the Justice Department lawyers working on the case. Mr. Barr did not say why, and a Justice Department spokeswoman would not say whether he had told aides about the discussions or instructed the lawyers on the case to keep pursuing the issue.

The lawyers expressed surprise last week at the president’s assertion, telling a federal judge who had summoned them to a conference call that they would most likely recant their earlier admission of defeat.

“The tweet this morning was the first I had heard of the president’s position on this issue, just like the plaintiffs and your honor,” Joshua Gardner, a lawyer working on the census issue, told Judge George J. Hazel of the United States District Court in Maryland.

But Mr. Barr said on Monday that the president’s statement did not surprise him because “he and I had talked” about the census issue “several times” after the Supreme Court tossed out the citizenship question.

Mr. Barr confirmed that lawyers in the Justice Department’s federal programs branch, who typically defend the administration’s positions in court, would no longer work on the census question. He said that James Burnham, the No. 2 official in the department’s civil division who had led the census team, recommended that lawyers in its consumer protection branch work on the question instead.

“They did a super job,” Mr. Barr said of the departing team. “They were very professional.”

Mr. Barr said that he did not know whether any of the original team members wanted to stay on. “I didn’t really get into the details,” he said.

Read More

Yardbarker's Ultimate Hall of Fame tiers: Active stars on path to enshrinement.
About our tiers What active athletes in the NFL, NBA, WNBA, Major League Baseball and NHL are Hall of Fame worthy? That's the question we posed to Yardbarker editors and writers, and boy did we have some spirited debates. (No blood was shed, however.) So we put together a list. The criteria was simple: To be considered, an athlete's resume must be impressive. Our definition of impressive? Hey, we know it when we see it. An athlete must have

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!