•   
  •   
  •   

USTrump administration's 'public charge' rule has chilling effect on benefits for immigrants' children

16:10  03 september  2019
16:10  03 september  2019 Source:   latimes.com

Trump tries to overturn ruling stopping him from blocking Twitter users

Trump tries to overturn ruling stopping him from blocking Twitter users President Trump is determined to challenge an appeals court ruling preventing him from blocking critics on Twitter. The Justice Department has filed papers for Trump that demanded a rehearing by the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, arguing that the three-judge panel's unanimous decision was "fundamentally misconceived." The move would supposedly create a chilling effect for politicians if upheld. "Public officials who address matters relating to their public office on personal accounts will run the risk that every action taken on that account will be state action subject to constitutional scrutiny," according to the filing.

They were reacting to the new " public charge " rule — published earlier this month — that could allow the federal government to deny green cards to But for Gallegos and others, convincing parents they don't have to opt out of benefits for their children has felt like a monumental task at a time when

"President Trump ' s new public charge rule is yet one more example of his Administration turning its back on "Under this rule , children will go hungry; families will go without medical care. Who the rule does and doesn't include. Immigrant advocates have argued that the rule goes beyond what

After a recent Sunday evening Mass, Luz Gallegos stepped up to the pulpit at St. Francis de Sales Catholic Church in Riverside to explain things and calm nerves.

Trump administration's 'public charge' rule has chilling effect on benefits for immigrants' children© Myung J. Chun/Los Angeles Times RIVERSIDE, CA -- AUGUST 18, 2019: Luz Gallegos, center, with the Training Occupational Development Educating Communities (TODEC) legal center, answers questions about the new "public charge" rule following church service at St. Francis de Sales church in Riverside. Undocumented parents are deciding to opt out of public benefits for their children because they are worried (likely wrongly) that it will hurt their own ability to gain legal status following the announcement of the rule. (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Gallegos and her colleagues at the TODEC Legal Center, an immigrant services provider in nearby Perris, had been receiving questions from parents who were considering disenrolling their children from a range of public benefits.

For undocumented workers, demanding better work conditions could mean deportation

For undocumented workers, demanding better work conditions could mean deportation For undocumented workers, the consequences of demanding better work conditions can be high — and include risking deportation.

The Trump administration in June 2018 was finalizing a proposed rule that could have These “ chilling effects ” are likely to stretch beyond immigrants themselves to affect U. S .-citizen children Public - Charge Rules : Historical Context and Proposed Changes. A. What Changes Does the Leaked

The Trump administration on Monday released the final version of a controversial rule that dramatically increases the government' s ability to The administration has portrayed the rule as a way to promote sufficiency and independence among immigrants . "We certainly expect people of any

They were reacting to the new "public charge" rule — published earlier this month — that could allow the federal government to deny green cards to immigrants who use Medicaid, food stamps, housing vouchers or other forms of public assistance, potentially making it harder for many to gain legal status in the United States.

Gallego told parishioners that the rule does not penalize an applicant for benefits received by a family member, such as a child who is a U.S. citizen.

But for Gallegos and others, convincing parents they don't have to opt out of benefits for their children has felt like a monumental task at a time when family separations, the threat of raids and President Trump's harsh rhetoric toward immigrants have created a deep sense of fear.

Trump officials say children of US service members overseas will not get automatic citizenship

Trump officials say children of US service members overseas will not get automatic citizenship The Trump administration said Wednesday that children born to U.S. military members and government employees working overseas will no longer automatically be considered United States citizens.U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a policy on Wednesday rescinding previous guidance stating that kids born to U.S. service members and other government officials abroad are considered "residing in the United States" and automatically given citizenship under a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The new policy guidance states that USCIS "no longer considers children of U.S. government employees and U.S.

"Through the public charge rule , President Trump ' s administration is reenforcing the ideal of self-sufficiency and personal responsibility, ensuring that Still, public health and social service providers say they have already seen a chilling effect among immigrants who are afraid to get government

“Through the public charge rule , President Trump ’ s administration is reinforcing the ideals of A USCIS official said the change will have little to no effect on those who already have permanent But advocates for immigrants say the new rule could narrow the pool of people who are eligible for

"People are terrified," Gallegos said. "At the end of the day, they are going to do what they need to do to protect their families."

Legal clinics have reported parents thinking about opting their children out of benefits that include services received at school, Medicaid, financial aid for college, and food stamps.

Federal law already requires people applying for green cards and legal status to prove they will not become a "public charge," or a financial burden to the U.S. But the new rule, which will take effect in mid-October if it survives legal challenges from California and other states, outlines a broader range of programs that could disqualify an applicant. Officials will weigh public assistance along with other factors such as education, household income and health.

Medicaid received by children under age 21 won't be considered. Nor will emergency medical assistance, school lunch programs, food pantries or disaster relief. Active U.S. military members are exempt, as are refugees or asylum seekers. The rule would also not be applied retroactively.

Trump administration ends automatic citizenship for some children of military, federal workers born abroad

Trump administration ends automatic citizenship for some children of military, federal workers born abroad The rule is expected to affect a “small” number of children whose parents have not lived in the United States for five years.

Under the Trump administration , the “ Public Charge rule ” is being interpreted broadly to reduce the number of people who are eligible for green cards and Various legislative proposals to reduce legal immigration have been endorsed by the Trump administration but have effectively zero chance of

The final rule enables the federal government to better carry out provisions of U. S . immigration law related to the public charge ground of inadmissibility. A. The final rule goes into effect on Oct. A. Congress has exempted certain classes of immigrants from the public charge ground of The final rule considers an alien a public charge if he or she receives public benefits for more than 12

Some began pulling out of public programs last year when rumors about the rule first circulated. A December survey by the Urban Institute, a nonprofit research organization, reported that nearly 14% of 1,950 adults who were foreign-born or living with foreign-born family members have avoided participating in public benefit programs in the last year because they worried it would hurt their chance to gain green cards.

Experts say that people are likely to fall back on what feels like the safest option without fully being able to understand how the rule applies to them.

"We're already seeing chilling effects," said Sara McTarnaghan, a research associate at the Urban Institute. "There are families that are stopping benefits for their U.S. citizen children. There are green card holders and naturalized citizens that stopped benefits even though they won't be affected."

Kelly Whitener, an associate research professor at the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families, said families are exposed to greater financial instability when a member is uninsured, and that children, in particular, could suffer serious consequences if they lose their benefits.

Climate hawk House Republicans oppose Trump rollback of Obama methane rule

Climate hawk House Republicans oppose Trump rollback of Obama methane rule Leading House Republicans who back federal policies to curb climate change say they oppose the Trump administration's move Thursday to eliminate direct federal regulation of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc.“I have serious concerns about this decision by the EPA," Rep. Francis Rooney of Florida told the Washington Examiner. Rooney is the chairman of the bipartisan House Climate Solutions Caucus and the leading Republican proponent in Congress of a carbon tax.

The Trump administration ’ s proposal only included estimates for categories one and four. This may be because the rule is being promulgated solely by DHS, which is only responsible for immigrants Moreover, as MPI notes, the proposed rule would “disproportionately affect women, children , and The proposed rule ’s effect on potential nonimmigrants is less clear, but because so many people are

The Trump administration published a final rule Monday making it harder for immigrants who have received certain public benefits such as food Higher ed experts and college administrators say the rule could have a chilling effect on immigrant students accessing benefits for which they're eligible

"When children have health coverage, they are more likely to get the preventative care that they need, they are more likely to have better attendance at school, graduate from high school, go on to college, get higher-paying jobs," she said.

Immigrants without legal status who spoke with the Times, requesting that only their first names be used out of fear of being deported, said they worried that they will be seen as a "public charge" because of the benefits their children receive.

Parents of children with disabilities who receive special services at school have removed or are considering removing them from school. Jhoana, who lives in Moreno Valley and is from Mexico's Jalisco state, said parents like her now worry about signing a portion of an Individualized Education Plan, or IEP, that allows a school district to get Medi-Cal reimbursements for services a child receives.

When the rule was published, she decided to enroll her 16-year-old son, who has autism, in online classes. She plans on trying to teach herself how to give him the speech and occupational therapy he was offered at school.

As a single mother, her driving concern was the possibility of being separated from her son if she does not gain legal status.

"You give up important services for your children out of fear, but what's worse is for your son not to be with you," she said.

Lawmakers decry plan to deport sick immigrants

Lawmakers decry plan to deport sick immigrants Trump administration abruptly shuttered a program that offered certain immigrants, including children with life-threatening health conditions, a temporary reprieve from deportation through a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) program known as medical deferred action. The decision to end the program "will needlessly endanger vulnerable children and families nationwide seeking medical deferments for individuals receiving life-saving treatment for serious illnesses," the lawmakers wrote.

Maria, who lives in Perris and is from Mexico City, pulled her 15-year-old son, who has autism, out of school for the same reason. She didn't ask the district for advice before doing so, not wanting to disclose that she was undocumented.

"There are some things you need to keep to yourself," she said.

However, Valerie Vanaman, an attorney who represents children with disabilities, said that parents do not need to give consent to allow a school district to receive reimbursement for services their child receives.

"Smart districts will reach out to families and tell them that they can rescind [that] part of the IEP," she said.

Miriam Nunez, a supervising attorney at the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles, said her staff has seen confusion about what types of applicants are subject to the rule, which exempts those who qualify for humanitarian visas like the U visa for victims of crimes.

"We're hearing that a U visa holder is afraid and they want to no longer receive medical or certain benefits for themselves or their children," she said.

She said her staff is seeing an uptick in calls from people withdrawing their citizenship applications.

"We've explained how the rule doesn't affect them ... but unfortunately, fear is greater than reason," she said. "This is precisely the sort of effect I believe this rule change is intended to have, to confuse and dissuade eligible candidates from applying for residency or even citizenship."

Luvia Quinones, the health policy director at the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, also said her staff has received calls about refugees and asylum seekers disenrolling from Medicaid and food benefits even though they should not be affected.

Unconfirmed by Senate, Cuccinelli sees power, influence grow on immigration

Unconfirmed by Senate, Cuccinelli sees power, influence grow on immigration Ken Cuccinelli is wielding immense power as the acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), where he has rolled out multiple significant and controversial policies in recent weeks. © Getty Images Unconfirmed by Senate, Cuccinelli sees power, influence grow on immigration In nearly three months on the job, Cuccinelli - who was not confirmed for the position by the Senate - has emerged as the point person for President Trump's immigration agenda. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

"People are just overall afraid of accessing anything," she said.

Citing pending litigation, a spokesperson for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, said the agency could not comment on allegations that the rule has created confusion among parents. But the Trump administration has defended the rule.

"We certainly expect anyone of any income to stand on their own two feet," Ken Cuccinelli, acting head of USCIS, said at a White House press briefing announcing the rule.

Jazmin Cerda, 26, a public benefits specialist at Brighton Park Neighborhood Council in Chicago, decided to opt out of benefits for her and her daughter in 2018 when the rule was still in its infancy.

Cerda feared that her and her then 3-year-old daughter's medical benefits could hurt her application for citizenship. But her daughter needed surgery to remove a cyst that was causing an infection in her throat. Cerda thought she needed to make an impossible choice.

"It was the benefits for my daughter or my citizenship," she said.

She decided to withdraw from her own medical benefits, as well as her daughter's food stamps. Cerda took up face painting as a side job to afford rent and food.

Later, she was told by a lawyer that she wouldn't have been subject to the rule because it does not apply to those seeking citizenship. Now, Cerda tries to connect people to low-cost attorneys when they ask her whether they should disenroll.

"I have lived the situation where you're in panic," she said.

At the church, Gallegos passed out fliers explaining the new rule. Belen, a Riverside resident from Mexico's Guanajuato state, asked Gallegos if she should continue to receive food stamps for her four children.

After hearing Gallego's advice, she said she would keep the benefits. The food stamps are vital, she said, since only her husband, a construction worker, is employed.

"It helps us a lot," she said. "It's food for my children. It's not for me."

Likewise, Alma, who came to the church with her three daughters, said she felt some relief when Gallegos told her that keeping her daughters on Medi-Cal would not jeopardize her case under the rule.

"The medical will be the last thing I take away from them," she said.

But Alma still worries about relying too much on public benefits. She refuses to apply for food stamps for her daughters, preferring to rely on church pantries, even though she's been told those benefits won't affect her.

"We do need it, because you always need food," she said. "If I saw the president say on TV this food for children won't affect me, I might ask for it."

Read More

U.S. judge restores nationwide block on Trump administration's asylum ban.
U.S. judge restores nationwide block on Trump administration's asylum ban

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!