•   
  •   
  •   

US Trump administration proposes Social Security rule changes that could cut off thousands of disabled recipients

23:30  12 december  2019
23:30  12 december  2019 Source:   philly.com

Trump administration tightens work requirements for SNAP, which could cut hundreds of thousands from food stamps

  Trump administration tightens work requirements for SNAP, which could cut hundreds of thousands from food stamps Trump administration tightens work requirements for SNAP, which could cut hundreds of thousands from food stamps . © Andrew Spear/For The Washington Post Thomas (last name withheld) loaded groceries into his car on October 4, 2018 at the Nelsonville Food Cupboard in Nelsonville, Ohio. The rule would tighten work requirements for able-bodied adults with no dependents, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced in a call with reporters. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The Trump administration is proposing changes to Social Security that could terminate disability payments to hundreds of thousands of The new rule would change aspects of disability reviews — the Few recipients are aware of the proposal , which is open for public comment through January.

Van Drew denied rumors Wednesday that his is considering changing his party affiliation after liberals and some party leaders have suggested they might seek to unseat him in a Trump administration proposes Social Security rule changes that could cut off thousands of disabled recipients .

Social security card and form.© Nick M. Do/Getty Images Social security card and form.

The Trump administration is proposing changes to Social Security that could terminate disability payments to hundreds of thousands of Americans, particularly older people and children.

The new rule would change aspects of disability reviews — the methods by which the Social Security Administration determines whether a person continues to qualify for benefits. Few recipients are aware of the proposal, which is open for public comment through January.

Hospitals Sue Trump to Keep Negotiated Prices Secret

  Hospitals Sue Trump to Keep Negotiated Prices Secret The nation’s hospital groups sued the Trump administration on Wednesday over a new federal rule that would require them to disclose the discounted prices they give insurers for all sorts of procedures. © Hilary Swift for The New York Times The hospital groups argue in their lawsuit that the rule will not accomplish the administration’s aim of helping consumers avoid surprise bills. The hospitals, including the American Hospital Association, argued in a lawsuit filed in United States District Court in Washington that the new rule “is unlawful, several times over.

The Trump administration has been quietly working on a proposal to use social media like Facebook and Twitter to help identify people who claim Social Security disability benefits without actually being disabled .

The U.S. Social Security Administration proposed stepped-up evaluation of social media posts In that same post, Park recounts having benefits cut for telling a medical professional he was feeling “ Trump Administration Seeks to Monitor Social Media of Disability Recipients , Including Vets.”

Critics of the plan liken it to the administration’s efforts to cut food stamps, among other entitlement programs, with insufficient information offered to explain curtailing benefits.

Social Security officials declined to comment. For years, Republicans have argued that Social Security benefits need to be reined in to save money.

The new rule, advocates for low-income Americans say, is just a way to push people off the disability rolls.

“I have serious concerns about this proposed rule,” said U.S. Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.), adding that it “appears to be yet another attempt by the Trump administration to make it more difficult for people with disabilities to receive benefits.”

In a similar vein, U.S. Rep. Brendan Boyle, a Northeast Philadelphia Democrat, said, “These changes seem arbitrary, concocted with no evidence or data to justify such consequential modifications. This seems like the next iteration of the Trump administration’s continued efforts to gut Social Security benefits.”

U.S. EPA ignores health benefits of coal rule it plans to weaken -economists

  U.S. EPA ignores health benefits of coal rule it plans to weaken -economists EPA ignores health benefits of coal rule it plans to weaken -economists

The Trump administration has high hopes for these measures. Instead, the tests would have resulted in program changes that only added more layers of bureaucracy without benefiting either the disabled populations the program is intended to serve or the taxpayers who fund Social Security .

The Trump administration this week proposed eliminating a decade-old regulation that puts hospitals at risk of losing their Medicare funding if too many of The rule the government is proposing to scrap is the same one that led the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to cut off funding last month

Typically, Americans who are too physically and/or mentally impaired to work may be eligible for one of two kinds of benefits: Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

While SSDI is for people who have worked at least 10 years, SSI is for low-income recipients who have seldom, if ever, been employed.

More than 16 million Americans receive either SSDI (8.5 million) or SSI (8 million). SSI benefits can run to $770 a month; SSDI payments, which are based on lifetime earnings, can range from $800 to $1,800 monthly, government figures show.

Merely getting benefits is an extraordinarily difficult task, often taking years and requiring applicants to compile reams of documents, then state and restate their cases in front of hearing officers, adjudicators, and judges.

Explaining the proposed rule change, Kathleen Romig, a senior policy analyst and Social Security expert at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning nonprofit in Washington, said, "Parts of what’s happening are mystifying. And it’s very complicated.”

States slashed 4,400 environmental agency jobs in past decade: study

  States slashed 4,400 environmental agency jobs in past decade: study A new report warns that spending cutbacks at state environmental protection agencies have led to thousands of job cuts at a time when the federal government is rolling back regulations.The study from the advocacy group Environmental Integrity Project found that states have eliminated 4,400 positions at agencies responsible for protecting the environment over the past decade. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Under McConnell's thinking, this could possibly mean calling Vice President Mike Pence and top White House aides, such as acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, to testify. Trump administration proposes Social Security rule changes that could cut off thousands of disabled recipients .

The proposed settlement would not require Weinstein, the embattled movie mogul whose alleged behavior propelled the #MeToo movement, to admit fault or personally pay Trump administration proposes Social Security rule changes that could cut off thousands of disabled recipients .

The new rule is “the government trying to kick us out of SSI,” said Jahan Johnson, 34, a single mother of three children — two of them on SSI — in Northeast Philadelphia. Johnson, who is bipolar and suffers from scoliosis, is also on SSI.

“What they’re doing is wrong, and making life harder.”

Those already receiving disability benefits are subject to so-called continuing disability reviews, which determine whether they are still deserving of compensation for an injury, illness, or other incapacitating problem as their lives progress.

Not everyone gets reviewed within the same time frame. A person with a grave illness such as Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) is placed in a category called “Medical Improvement Not Expected,” and is subject to review every five to seven years.

A low-birth-weight baby, on the other hand, is categorized as “Medical Improvement Expected,” and the case is reviewed every six to 18 months, because growth and change are anticipated, Romig said.

A third category is “Medical Improvement Possible.”

All three categories are based on existing medical standards meant to help officials decide whether benefits are still warranted, said Kate Lang, senior attorney at Justice in Aging, a Washington-based nonprofit that focuses on health benefits for low-income older adults.

AOC called out after claiming Trump food-stamp revisions might have left her family 'starved'

  AOC called out after claiming Trump food-stamp revisions might have left her family 'starved' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., received pushback Thursday after claiming her family "might've just starved" had the Trump administration's tightened requirements for food stamp recipients been in place when her father died in 2008. © REUTERS/Erin Scott Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Critics claimed the freshman congresswoman misrepresented the new rules, pointing out that they apply only to childless, able-bodied adults under 50. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

CHICAGO/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump administration on Tuesday proposed a rule to The agency wants to change that by requiring people who receive TANF benefits to pass a review of their Current rules allow people to access SNAP benefits worth thousands of dollars for two years

The rule is part of Republican Trump ’s efforts to curb both legal and illegal immigration, an issue he has made a cornerstone of his presidency. Other immigrant advocates have expressed concern the rule could negatively affect public health by dissuading immigrants from using health or food aid.

The proposed rule change would create a fourth category: “Medical Improvement Likely,” which would mandate disability reviews every two years, creating an additional 2.6 million reviews over the first 10-year period.

An estimated 4.4 million beneficiaries would be included in that designation, many of them children and so-called Step 5 recipients, an internal Social Security classification, said Jennifer Burdick, supervising attorney with Community Legal Services in Philadelphia.

When applicants try to receive disability benefits, they either have one of a list of specified medical impairments, or they suffer from a combination of disabilities that make working difficult or impossible, Burdick said. The latter group are Step 5 and are entitled to SSI or SSDI benefits, according to federal law.

They are typically 50 to 65 years of age, in poor health, without much education or many job skills. They often suffer from maladies such as debilitating back pain, depression, a herniated disc, or schizophrenia.

The inclusion of Step 5 people in the “Medical Improvement Likely” category appears to make little sense, advocates for recipients say.

Medical conditions generally deteriorate as already unhealthy people age, and no evidence exists that such beneficiaries are “likely” to improve, Burdick said.

Tesla on Autopilot slams into police cruiser; driver says he was checking on dog

  Tesla on Autopilot slams into police cruiser; driver says he was checking on dog A Tesla on Autopilot crashed into a police cruiser and another car in Connecticut.The driver of the Tesla told police that he put the car on Autopilot because he was checking on his dog in the backseat, according to a statement from Connecticut State Police.

Under the proposed measure, unveiled in December, restaurants and other establishments could require waiters, bartenders and delivery drivers — any employee who receives tips — to share the The Trump administration wants restaurant workers to share tips Trump tried to save their jobs.

The Trump administration has pressed repeatedly to impose abortion limits. Upon taking office, Mr. Trump signed a presidential memorandum reinstituting and Abortion rights advocates also argue that the new rules could result in women not receiving reproductive health care at all, leading to more

Labeling them that way is “a radical departure from past practice,” she said. “There’s no medical or scientific basis to say they’ll get better.”

Compelling Step 5 recipients to be reviewed every two years shows “a hostility toward the basic Social Security Act, which takes a holistic view of the individual,” said Jonathan Stein, a former Community Legal Services attorney who is working with Burdick.

He said he believes the ultimate aim of the rule is to review Step 5 recipients so often that they ultimately lose their benefits because of the difficulties complying with the review process.

“There’s an underhandedness to this,” Stein said. “It’s ideological, not based on medicine or science.”

Lang, of Justice in Aging, said simply, “They’re out to shrink the rolls. And they’re setting people up to not comply.”

Stein cited writings by Mark Warshawsky, deputy commissioner for retirement and disability policy at the Social Security Administration, who has often proposed eliminating the criteria of older age, low education, and unskilled work experience in determining eligibility for SSI and SSDI.

And in March, the conservative Heritage Foundation, which often provides underlying rationale for Trump administration policies, released a statement that said, “Factors of age, education, and experience do not and cannot cause workers to be disabled from performing all work .... Only physical and mental conditions ... should qualify individuals to receive disability insurance benefits.”

Asked about the appearance of taking benefits from vulnerable Americans in an election season, Lang replied, “I don’t think they care about the optics very much. They’re just focused on saving money.”

———

©2019 The Philadelphia Inquirer

Visit The Philadelphia Inquirer at www.inquirer.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

New Trump admin rule would further limit immigrants' eligibility for asylum .
DUIs, drug paraphernalia possession, and unlawful receipt of public benefits would be among seven triggers barring migrants from even applying for asylum.The rule, if finalized, would give asylum officers seven requirements with which to deem an immigrant ineligible to apply for asylum.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 26
This is interesting!