US Appeals court throws out lawsuit by children seeking to force action on climate crisis

21:05  17 january  2020
21:05  17 january  2020 Source:   cnn.com

Court freezes woman's defamation suit against Trump

  Court freezes woman's defamation suit against Trump NEW YORK (AP) — A court Tuesday froze a former “Apprentice” contestant's lawsuit over President Donald Trump's response to her sexual assault allegations, a defamation case now headed to New York's highest court. The decision, by a midlevel state appeals court, holds off further proceedings in Summer Zervos' suit until the top-level Court of Appeals decides whether to dismiss it or delay it through his presidency. Trump had been due to undergo sworn pretrial questioning by Jan. 31. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

a group of people posing for the camera© Robin Loznak/Our Children's Trust

A federal appeals court on Friday threw out a heavily promoted but long-shot lawsuit by a group of children and teenagers trying to force the federal government to take action to address the climate crisis.

The 2-1 ruling says the children must look to the political branches -- Congress and the executive branch -- for action, rather than the courts.

Action in Washington, however, has gone the other way, with the Trump administration pulling out of the Paris climate accord and looking to rewrite Obama-era environmental laws limiting greenhouse gas emissions responsible for the increase in global temperatures and associated effects of climate change.

U.S. court blocks Trump from enforcing 'public charge' immigration rule

  U.S. court blocks Trump from enforcing 'public charge' immigration rule USA-IMMIGRATION/ (UPDATE 1, PIX):UPDATE 1-U.S. court blocks Trump from enforcing 'public charge' immigration ruleIn a brief order, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan also set an expedited schedule for the White House's appeal of a lower court ruling against the rule, with legal papers to be submitted by Feb. 14 and oral arguments to be held soon afterward.

"The plaintiffs have made a compelling case that action is needed; it will be increasingly difficult in light of that record for the political branches to deny that climate change is occurring, that the government has had a role in causing it, and that our elected officials have a moral responsibility to seek solutions," the majority opinion states.

"We reluctantly conclude, however, that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large, the latter of which can change the composition of the political branches through the ballot box. That the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes."

Court blocks Air Force from discharging HIV+ service members

  Court blocks Air Force from discharging HIV+ service members A US appeals court on Friday upheld an injunction blocking the Air Force from discharging two HIV-positive airmen. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); The policy, the court ruled, is obsolete. "A ban on deployment may have been justified at a time when HIV treatment was less effective at managing the virus and reducing transmission risks," a three-judge panel of the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals wrote.

The lawsuit began in 2015 during the Obama administration. The children suing allege their constitutional rights to life, liberty and property are being violated by a US government that is knowingly promoting the extraction and burning of fossil fuels, which cause dangerous levels of warming, raising sea levels and promoting droughts and storms.

They also say they have a right to a safe atmosphere, and that they are being discriminated against as young people who will bear outsize consequences of the climate emergency.

Judges Andrew Hurwitz and Mary Murguia were in the majority. Judge Josephine Staton dissented. All three were nominated by President Barack Obama.

In her stinging dissent, Staton said the government is blatantly ignoring the climate crisis.

"In these proceedings, the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response -- yet presses ahead toward calamity. It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses," Staton wrote. "Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the Nation."

Clearview AI faces lawsuit following facial recognition privacy concerns .
The app is an "insidious encroachment" on civil liberties, the complaint alleges."The conduct of Defendant Clearview, as alleged herein, epitomizes the insidious encroachment on an individual's liberty," the complaint, reported earlier Friday by CNET sister site ZDNet, says. It alleges Clearview AI "acted out of pure greed.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!