US Appeals court throws out lawsuit by children seeking to force action on climate crisis

21:05  17 january  2020
21:05  17 january  2020 Source:   cnn.com

Lawsuit seeks to ease adoption of Equal Rights Amendment

  Lawsuit seeks to ease adoption of Equal Rights Amendment BOSTON (AP) — Supporters of the Equal Rights Amendment have filed a federal lawsuit in Massachusetts aimed at clearing a legal path for adoption of the long-delayed constitutional amendment. Backers say they're wading into the debate over the amendment — which dates to the early 1970s — because Virginia is poised to become the decisive 38th state to approve the measure. Amendments are added to the U.S. Constitution if they are approved by three-quarters of state legislatures. The anticipated approval of the amendment by Virginia would put the ERA over that threshold.But the process is likely to hit some snags.

a group of people posing for the camera© Robin Loznak/Our Children's Trust

A federal appeals court on Friday threw out a heavily promoted but long-shot lawsuit by a group of children and teenagers trying to force the federal government to take action to address the climate crisis.

The 2-1 ruling says the children must look to the political branches -- Congress and the executive branch -- for action, rather than the courts.

Action in Washington, however, has gone the other way, with the Trump administration pulling out of the Paris climate accord and looking to rewrite Obama-era environmental laws limiting greenhouse gas emissions responsible for the increase in global temperatures and associated effects of climate change.

Australia fires 'long way from over' but rain brings relief

  Australia fires 'long way from over' but rain brings relief Massive bushfires in southeastern Australia have a "long way to go", authorities have warned, even as colder conditions brought some relief to exhausted firefighters and communities on Saturday.  1/53 SLIDES © Alkis Konstantinidis/Reuters Smoke rises from the Eden Woodchip Mill, from a fire that has been blazing for days, after bush fires came close the previous week to Eden, Australia on Jan 10.  The fires have killed more than 27 people and approximately 1 billion animals.

"The plaintiffs have made a compelling case that action is needed; it will be increasingly difficult in light of that record for the political branches to deny that climate change is occurring, that the government has had a role in causing it, and that our elected officials have a moral responsibility to seek solutions," the majority opinion states.

"We reluctantly conclude, however, that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large, the latter of which can change the composition of the political branches through the ballot box. That the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes."

Sharon Osbourne slams Prince Harry, Duchess Meghan for bad timing

  Sharon Osbourne slams Prince Harry, Duchess Meghan for bad timing Sharon Osbourne explains why she doesn't support Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan in their plans to "step back" from their royal posts.Speaking to viewers on the Thursday, Jan. 9, edition of "The Talk," the TV personality expressed concern that Harry and Meghan may have blindsided the rest of their family by presenting their decision as a done deal rather than an idea they were negotiating towards.

The lawsuit began in 2015 during the Obama administration. The children suing allege their constitutional rights to life, liberty and property are being violated by a US government that is knowingly promoting the extraction and burning of fossil fuels, which cause dangerous levels of warming, raising sea levels and promoting droughts and storms.

They also say they have a right to a safe atmosphere, and that they are being discriminated against as young people who will bear outsize consequences of the climate emergency.

Judges Andrew Hurwitz and Mary Murguia were in the majority. Judge Josephine Staton dissented. All three were nominated by President Barack Obama.

In her stinging dissent, Staton said the government is blatantly ignoring the climate crisis.

"In these proceedings, the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response -- yet presses ahead toward calamity. It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses," Staton wrote. "Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the Nation."

Factbox: Climate change plans of the leading U.S. Democratic candidates .
Factbox: Climate change plans of the leading U.S. Democratic candidatesWhile the candidates have the same broad goals, they vary in their approaches.

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!