•   
  •   
  •   

US Supreme Court makes religious school education eligible for public aid

18:40  30 june  2020
18:40  30 june  2020 Source:   usatoday.com

The quiet question in the Supreme Court abortion case that could have a major impact

  The quiet question in the Supreme Court abortion case that could have a major impact Louisiana is also questioning third-party standing in June Medical Services v. Russo, an abortion case with the Supreme Court. June Medical Services v. Russo is a challenge to a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers have admitting privileges with a nearby hospital, an agreement between a doctor and a hospital that allows a patient to go to that hospital if they need urgent care.

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court delivered a major victory Tuesday to parents seeking state aid for their children's religious school education.

The court's conservative majority ruled 5-4 that states offering scholarships to students in private schools cannot exclude religious schools from such programs. The decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts, who has joined the liberal justices in three other major rulings this month.

'This is hell': Parents and kids hate online classes. Going back to school likely will include more of it.

  'This is hell': Parents and kids hate online classes. Going back to school likely will include more of it. America's teachers know little about how to improve online classes. They're spending almost no energy trying to figure it out before back to school.While his wife holed up in the bedroom to work each day, Seaman, a media and marketing professional, worked from the family room where he could supervise his children's virtual learning. A similar scene played out in millions of American homes after schools shuttered and moved classes online to contain the coronavirus.

a group of people standing in front of a building: Kendra Espinoza, lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court case challenging state bans on funding religious schools, addresses the media following oral argument Wednesday. © Matthew Sobocinski, USAT Kendra Espinoza, lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court case challenging state bans on funding religious schools, addresses the media following oral argument Wednesday.

The court stopped short of requiring states to fund religious education, ruling only that programs cannot differentiate between religious and secular private schools.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

"A state need not subsidize private education. But once a state decides to do so, it cannot disqualify some private schools solely because they are religious," Roberts said.

Supreme Court boosts religious schools seeking public aid

  Supreme Court boosts religious schools seeking public aid In a 5-4 decision from Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court upheld a Montana scholarship program funded by tax-credits to aid religious schools. The narrow 5-4 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, said that a "no-aid provision" in the Montana constitution violates the First Amendment. Thirty-eight other states have similar amendments. The ruling could make it easier for religious schools nationwide to obtain public funds.

Three moms: Supreme Court battle over school choice may boost religious freedom

It was a decision long sought by proponents of school choice and vehemently opposed by teachers' unions, who fear it could drain needed tax dollars from struggling public schools. 

The case was brought by three mothers from Montana who sought $500 tuition scholarships funded by a state tax credit program. The state's supreme court struck down the program, citing the separation of church and state and prompting state officials to deny funds to secular schools as well.

The Supreme Court's liberal justices seized on that point in three separate dissents. They said Montana solved the discrimination by ending the program.

"Petitioners may still send their children to a religious school," Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said. "There simply are no scholarship funds to be had."

Trump calls Supreme Court ruling a 'historic win for families who want school choice'

  Trump calls Supreme Court ruling a 'historic win for families who want school choice' Earlier this month, Trump called school choice the civil rights issue “all-time in this country.”“Today’s SCOTUS ruling is a historic win for families who want SCHOOL CHOICE NOW!” Trump tweeted. “#SchoolChoice is a civil rights issue, and no parent should have to send their child to a failing school.

But Roberts and other conservative justices said the no-aid policy had its roots in constitutional amendments in 37 states, many rooted in 19th century anti-Catholic sentiment, that blocked religious schools from receiving public funds. 

"The Blaine Amendment was 'born of bigotry' and 'arose at a time of pervasive hostility to the Catholic Church and to Catholics in general,'" he wrote. "Many of its state counterparts have a similarly 'shameful pedigree.'"

Conservative groups had flooded the high court with arguments supporting Kendra Espinoza and her fellow Montana parents' cause. Having long sought legislative backing for school voucher and tax credit programs, they saw the case as a judicial promised land.

“The weight that this monumental decision carries is immense, as it’s an extraordinary victory for student achievement, parental control, equality in educational opportunities, and First Amendment rights,” said Jeanne Allen, founder of the Center for Education Reform. 

Supreme Court cases: Here are the 8 cases justices have yet to rule on

  Supreme Court cases: Here are the 8 cases justices have yet to rule on The Supreme Court is taking an unusually long time to complete its term this year, with decisions in eight cases still under wraps days after the justices would have typically cleared out its docket for the season. © Photo-Illustration:CNN/Getty Inages The coronavirus pandemic can be partly blamed for the delay. Already, the justices broke tradition in May by holding oral arguments over the phone and broadcasting them live as much of the country was under lockdown. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Teachers unions and civil rights groups worried that if the floodgates open for religious school funding, public schools will suffer. They said a ruling for the religious school parents would violate the Constitution. 

The decision also was denounced by groups advocating secularism.

“Let’s be clear about what just happened: The Supreme Court has decided that atheist taxpayers are now required to fund religious schools,” said Robyn Blumner, president of the Center for Inquiry. “Members of non-Christian faiths are now required to fund Christian education."

Nationwide, tax credits and vouchers help about 500,000 students attend religious schools. But 17 states specifically block religious school choice programs.

The Trump administration had sided with the parents. President Donald Trump has long championed prayer in schools, and January's oral argument in the case was attended by Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, a longtime proponent of religious schools.

The ruling was another in a long line of Supreme Court decisions upholding religious freedom. In recent years, the justices have upheld public prayer at government meetings and exempted some religious objectors from laws regarding insurance coverage for contraception and participation in same-sex marriages

Supreme Court ensures more educational opportunity for kids

  Supreme Court ensures more educational opportunity for kids The Espinoza ruling is welcome news for families across the country — but especially in the 38 states with no-aid provisions.The Montana legislature created a tax-credit scholarship program in 2015 that would allow families to apply for scholarship funds and use them at any qualified private school. This initially included religious schools, which make up more than two-thirds of private schools in Montana. In order to incentivize donations to the scholarship fund, taxpayers would receive a modest tax credit of $150 per year for their donation.

Last year, the court ruled 7-2 that a mammoth Latin cross on government land in Bladensburg, Maryland, does not have to be moved or altered in the name of church-state separation.

And in a 2017 case cited by conservative justices as paving the way for the school choice decision, the justices ruled 7-2 that a Lutheran church in Missouri was eligible for public funds to resurface its playground. Roberts called the state's exclusion of the church "odious to our Constitution."

Civil rights groups and teachers unions had cited a different 7-2 decision from the high court in 2004, when the justices upheld a public scholarship program that excluded students pursuing theology degrees.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court makes religious school education eligible for public aid

What's behind Roberts' stinging rebuke of Trump (opinion) .
Elie Honig writes that after John Roberts issued his latest decision in the case of Trump's financials, it's clear the chief justice is conscious of his legacy and does not want his tenure to go down in history as one in which the court became hopelessly divided.Time and again, Roberts defied conventional wisdom and entrenched ideology to join with the court's traditionally liberal bloc (and, at times, other conservatives) to deliver stunning rulings that forcefully rejected the Trump administration's legal positions on issues of vital importance to the American public.

usr: 0
This is interesting!