•   
  •   
  •   

US Court grapples with protections for journalists in Portland unrest

20:20  18 september  2020
20:20  18 september  2020 Source:   politico.com

Trailblazing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg dies; succession battle looms

  Trailblazing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg dies; succession battle looms Trailblazing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg dies; succession battle loomsWASHINGTON (Reuters) - Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a stalwart liberal on the U.S. Supreme Court since 1993, died on Friday at age 87, the court said, giving President Donald Trump a chance to expand its conservative majority with a third appointment at a time of deep divisions in America with a presidential election looming.

A federal appeals court is mulling whether to restore a judge’s injunction protecting journalists and legal observers from being targeted by federal agents responding to protests and civil unrest in Portland, Ore.

a man wearing a helmet: Portland police take control of the streets after making arrests on the scene of the nightly protests. © Paula Bronstein/AP Photo Portland police take control of the streets after making arrests on the scene of the nightly protests.

During oral arguments Thursday, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals appeared split on whether to issue a stay that would effectively reinstate the preliminary injunction that U.S. District Court Judge Michael Simon imposed last month after issuing a similar temporary restraining order in July.

McConnell vows quick vote on next justice; Biden says wait

  McConnell vows quick vote on next justice; Biden says wait WASHINGTON (AP) — The death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg just six weeks before the election cast an immediate spotlight on the crucial high court vacancy, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell quickly vowing to bring to a vote whoever President Donald Trump nominates. Democratic nominee Joe Biden vigorously disagreed, declaring that "voters should pick the president and the president should pick the justice to consider.” require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); McConnell, who sets the calendar in the U.S.

Another three-judge panel voted, 2-1, late last month to issue an administrative stay that lifted Simon’s order, but another panel was assigned to consider whether the injunction would be in effect or not while the government’s appeal seeking to overturn the order goes forward.

While the appeals court issued no ruling Thursday, Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain, a Reagan appointee, sounded skeptical of the injunction. By contrast, Judge Morgan Christen, an Obama appointee, suggested there was enough flexibility for the authorities in the order that the appeals court should allow the injunction to go back into effect.

Is 8 enough? Court vacancy could roil possible election case

  Is 8 enough? Court vacancy could roil possible election case WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death has left the Supreme Court shorthanded during a polarizing presidential campaign in which President Donald Trump has already suggested he may not accept the outcome and the court could be called on to step in and decide the fate of the nation. It's the second time in four years that a justice has died during an election year, though that eight-justice court was not asked to referee any election disputes in 2016. Today, both sides have armies of lawyers ready to take the outcome to court.

The third jurist on the panel, Clinton-appointed Judge Johnnie Rawlinson, seemed like she could be the swing vote. Her take on the injunction was harder to assess, but she said the case involved the challenge of balancing the rights of journalists “against the right of the police to maintain order.”

“How are we supposed to make that balance?” Rawlinson asked.

The injunction and earlier TRO Simon issued bars federal agents from using force against journalists or legal observers and exempts them when orders are given to the general public to disperse. Officers remain free to arrest people who claim to be press or observers, but who engage in criminal activity.

Justice Department lawyer Sopan Joshi told the court that the injunction puts federal agents in danger and complicates their work.

“This injunction is currently hanging over their heads and every interaction comes with an untenable choice, which is they have to risk their safety or risk contempt,” he said.

Fact check: Viral posts falsely claim Ruth Bader Ginsburg had already died

  Fact check: Viral posts falsely claim Ruth Bader Ginsburg had already died Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died Sept. 18, but some viral posts falsely claim she died up to 2 years ago.Ruth Bader Ginsburg reflects on being 'notorious' in first appearance since cancer treatment

Joshi also said officers face danger from individuals who claim to be press in order to get behind police lines.

“The whole point of a dispersal order is to clear the area of everybody,” Joshi said. “The unrebutted facts show that there are violent opportunists that are hiding behind and pretending to be press.” The DOJ lawyer also asked what officers are to do if “everybody in the crowd pipes up and says, ‘I’m a journalist.’”

Matthew Borden, an attorney who brought the case in cooperation with the American Civil Liberties Union, said that the concerns about troublemakers masquerading as journalists are exaggerated and that the judge’s orders has proven workable. “There is a perfect track record of safety under this injunction,” he said.

Borden said the injunction is crucial to guarantee an independent perspective on the disturbances in Portland and the efforts to quell them. “Allowing the government to control the news is the hallmark of a dictatorship….They have a public affairs agent who is there taking video and taking photographs,” he said. “Somebody needs to be there to document whether these dispersal orders are legal and whether they’re being enforced in a proper and constitutional way.”

Arizona Senate candidate Mark Kelly could take office early if he wins, putting him in place for a court vote

  Arizona Senate candidate Mark Kelly could take office early if he wins, putting him in place for a court vote If Democratic candidate Mark Kelly were to defeat Sen. Martha McSally, he could be sworn in before year's end – in time to vote on a court nominee.Antonin Scalia's son on his father's "odd couple" friendship with RBG

Joshi argued that the injunction privileges journalists by guaranteeing them “special access” in a way the Supreme Court has never countenanced.

O'Scannlain seemed to agree with that assessment, but Borden insisted that was not the case. He said that while federal agents might be infringing on the rights of many members of the public, including protesters and other passers-by, journalists had the right to go to court and seek protection for themselves even if the injunction Simon granted is “underinclusive.”

Borden also said that given the series of allegations that some federal agents directly targeted journalists with less-than-lethal munitions, an order giving media representatives some added protection was appropriate. “Maybe it’s a broader protection than what they might otherwise be entitled to, but it is a reasonable exercise of equitable powers,” he said.

Christen said there were “lots and lots of examples” in the court record of journalists claiming they were injured by federal officers. And she emphatically noted that many courts have joined the 9th Circuit in finding a constitutional right to videotape police.

“That right has been explicitly recognized by the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 11th Circuits. We’re not alone in that regard,” the judge said.

'A leader of all humanity': Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a hero, icon, fighter for women and girls across the nation

  'A leader of all humanity': Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a hero, icon, fighter for women and girls across the nation For millions of women across the U.S., Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a hero, an icon and a champion. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Vanessa Cantley was at her son's first high school football game in Louisville, Kentucky, on Friday night when she got an alert on her phone.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Christen also noted that the injunction permits incidental use of force against journalists if they happen to be intermingled with others legitimately targeted by authorities. And she also questioned whether the federal agents have authority to issue dispersal orders off of federal property.

Joshi said that power exists at the federal courthouse and in a park nearby, but the full scope of that authority isn’t relevant to the current case.

One issue that came up near the outset of the 40-minute argument, which the judges and Borden joined by videoconference and Joshi joined by phone, was just where the federal agents are now.

The Trump administration dispatched dozens of Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to Portland in early July after declaring that local officials were being ineffectual in preventing damage to the federal courthouse and other federal buildings. The deployment was opposed by Portland’s mayor and seemed to amplify the protests.

Several weeks later, the Trump administration and Gov. Kate Brown (D-Ore.) struck a deal to have state police take over protection of the courthouse. Brown and other officials said the federal agents were leaving town, but federal officials were cagey about who — if anyone — was leaving.

Joshi maintained that that caginess Thursday as O’Scannlain asked what the “status” is of the agents that were sent to Portland.

“I don’t think it’s a matter in the record or of public record,” Joshi said.


Video: Judge Napolitano on legal authority for mask mandate: ‘Absolutely unconstitutional’ (FOX News)

Fact check: Ruth Bader Ginsburg planned to stay on Supreme Court at least a few more years

  Fact check: Ruth Bader Ginsburg planned to stay on Supreme Court at least a few more years A viral meme suggesting that Ruth Bader Ginsburg said her Supreme Court seat should have been vacated in 2019 is false.Trump casts doubt on Ginsburg's dying wish

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg returns to Supreme Court for final time .
Even as President Donald Trump readied a potential replacement, Ginsburg's family, friends, former clerks and colleagues prepared for a last goodbye.U.S.

usr: 1
This is interesting!