US In an Amy Coney Barrett reality, "What the Constitution Means to Me" is even more gutting
Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court hearings lacked the drama that Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings had. Here's why.
Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings lacked the drama of Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings. Here's why.Democrats warned of the precedent set if Republicans rushed through a nominee in the middle of a pandemic and presidential election, arguing no nominee should be considered until after voters cast ballots. They rattled off threats to slow the process, teasing a host of tools that could bog down the hearings, with some lawmakers even publicly suggesting launching impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.
Heidi Schreck in a scene from “What the Constitution Means to Me.” Joan Marcus/Amazon Studios
describes her teenage self, the one who earned her college tuition by dominating debate competitions hosted in American Legion halls around the country, She plays 15-year-old Heidi this way and with tremendous comedic verve for about the first 37 minutes of " ," 's filmed production of Schreck's Tony Award-nominated Broadway show currently streaming on Amazon.
Republicans on Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination as Democrats boycott hearing
The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation to the Supreme Court on Thursday, setting up a full Senate vote Monday.The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet at 9 a.m. EDT. Barrett is expected to be approved by Republicans who hold the majority on the panel, with Democrats saying they will boycott the day's proceedings. The full Senate is expected to take a final vote on Barrett's confirmation on Monday, eight days before Election Day.
You only need to bask in Schreck's forced gentility to understand why she was champion at Constitutional debate. The type of youthful zest coached into Schreck by her mother is one that countless girls and women have been taught to internalize and to shine as a survival mechanism, and it bursts forth from her muscular smile like a sunbeam in some scenes and piercing laser in others.
That smile retreats when Schreck relaxes into her true self, "an adult woman in my very late 40s" who starts talking about the Equal Protection Clause taken from the text of the 14th Amendment – something she admits is increasingly difficult for her to discuss as time goes on.
This is the point in Schreck's one-woman show where the playwright takes off her schoolgirl version's yellow blazer, shedding the innocent light and excitement that charmed so many American Legionnaires and parents all those decades ago. Until Schreck announces that she's being "herself all the time now" she introduces each clause as magical! And miraculous! In their purest ideal forms, they are.
Merriam-Webster dictionary updates 'sexual preference' entry after Amy Coney Barrett hearing
Merriam-Webster added the word "offensive" to its usage guidance of "preference" and "sexual preference" when referring to sexual orientation.During the hearing Tuesday, Barrett was asked whether she agrees with the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s criticism of the same-sex marriage ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges – the landmark case which legalized gay marriage in the United States and which advocates worry Barrett would not support if confirmed to the nation's highest court.
However – and here is the reason Schreck sheds her cloak of innocence – the statistics she cites to back up her argument that the United States is one of the most dangerous places in the world for women, thereby proving this clause has yet to be enforced in a way that lives up to its dual promise of equality and protection.
Amazon publicized the premiere date of "What the Constitution Means to Me" on Sept. 17, one day beforeGinsburg saw the play in the summer of 2019, ; a showstopper near its ending is a snippet of audio featuring Ginsburg answering the question of when there will be enough women on the Supreme Court with, "when there are nine."
The hour or so prior to this is a physicalized wrestling display between Schreck concurring with and dissenting from the opinion of the Constitution her younger self once held. Throughout the production she demonstrates her profound admiration for what the Constitution symbolizes while tearing into its flaws with frustration and disappointment. Obviously the fact that this document provided opportunities for her and other women of her generation is close to her heart, but like so many aspects about American life and history, to love it enough to comprehend its intent is to enter a shadowy place of compromise.
Trump-Biden town halls, Amy Coney Barrett hearings, Medicare open enrollment begins: 5 things to know Thursday
NBC and ABC host dueling town halls with Trump and Biden, final day of hearings in Amy Coney Barrett's nomination and more things to know Thursday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
Schreck filters her viewpoint of the Constitution through her own family's history, spelling out how four generations of women in her family survived misogyny, abuse and deprivation, aspects of violence for which its articles and amendments contain little to no remedy thanks to generations of Supreme Courts dominated by men. She doesn't reserve her aggravation only for herself and the women of her family but all of those shortchanged by its promise, including Native Americans, Black men and women, immigrants and members of LGBTQIA+ communities.
Notably in this age of thematic circumstance as art reflecting life as it moves and erupts, filmmaker Marielle Heller's 103-minute production also happens to debut at the end of a week of Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for, to replace Ginsburg on the Supreme Court.
Schreck's play doesn't directly speak to the infuriating misogyny surrounding Barrett's rushed confirmation – its production was finished quite some time ago – but it offersby citing a consequential decision written by Barrett's mentor, Justice Antonin Scalia, that's been called "the death of the 14th Amendment for women."
Senators to grill Amy Coney Barrett on third day of Supreme Court confirmation hearings
Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings will continue on Wednesday with senators asking more questions on healthcare, abortion and gunsMembers of the Senate Judiciary Committee will get another chance to question Barrett on her views on the law and a number of hot-button issues that could come before the court.
The performer's impassioned explanation of the case and the decision's grim consequence becomes all the graver when absorbed in concert with Heller's choice of framing. Schreck's set at the Helen Hayes Theater mimics the wood paneling of a veteran post's interior whose walls are lined with sober old photos of men in dress uniform, staring out at her.
In these gutting moments, as her adult self candidly shares the aching stories the bright naïf she used to be never could, the director slams between tight frames of Schreck's stricken face and wider shots that set her against these glowering faces, as if to evoke the appearance of her being under siege by some patriarchal ghost army. (Before writing off the production as somehow anti-male, though, consider that Schreck's only company onstage aside from these photos is the kindly faced Mike Iveson, her stand-in for all the Legionnaires who moderated those long-ago competitions and her vision of positive male energy.)
Schreck's show bobs and weaves between play acting and confessional in a way that invites the audience to ride the highs and lows of her discoveries about her family history and that of our country's justice system, and experience the lights of faith and dim devastation her emotional journey yields. Curious as I am to hear what Barrett and other declared originalists would make of this production, I'd be vastly more interested to see what her four daughters might take away from it.
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett strives to show independence from White House, Republicans
The confirmation hearing is wedged closely between Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death and an election in which Republicans could lose power.In a marathon session before the Senate Judiciary Committee just three weeks from Election Day, Barrett was put on the defensive by Democrats charging that she was picked because of her views on abortion, gun rights, same-sex marriage and particularly the health care law headed to the high court for the third time next month.
The joy of "What the Constitution Means to Me" is the liveliness of Schreck's connection to. Not only does Schreck genuinely seek to understand the spirit of the Constitution, she believes in its possibilities despite its many imperfections . . . because the problem isn't necessarily the document itself.
Even if we remade the Constitution with human rights enshrined from the beginning, she points out that we would still have to trust the people interpreting that document. "We still have to trust the people who are in charge," she says.
Directly in the wake of this sobering observation, transitioning into that RBG quote, Schreck restarts the motor by bringing on the next generation of debaters, represented by high schooler Rosdely Ciprian in one version of the production's end and recent high school graduate Thursday Williams in the other – two young Black women, one a child of Dominican parents.
Their role is to be her opposition in a rousing debate over the question of whether the Constitution should be kept, or abolished and rewritten to be truly egalitarian. I'll leave it up to viewers to decide which is the more persuasive of the two and only say that the winner is determined by each audience . . . and a number of them voted to abolish.
I don't believe this speaks ill of the Constitution itself as certainly as it indicates the passion and thoughtfulness with which the next generation hints at approaching the battle to continue amending this imperfect framework and working toward that more perfect union. Between Schreck, Ciprian, and Williams "What the Constitution Means to Me" becomes a hopeful vision and reminder that the Constitution a living document, but one that needs to be brought alive constantly by successive generations.
Senate Democrats will boycott Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing vote as GOP vows to move forward
Senate Democrats say they will boycott a committee hearing Thursday where Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination is set to move forward.The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote tomorrow afternoon on Barrett's confirmation to the high court, a vote that was expected to pass along party lines and send her nomination to the full Senate for a Monday vote — just eight days before Election Day.
"What the Constitution Means to Me" is currently streaming on Amazon.
Biden-Trump debate, Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS nomination: 5 things to know Thursday .
Trump and Biden face-off in the final presidential debate, Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination and more things to start your Thursday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.