•   
  •   
  •   

US Feds need to tell us a lot more about the Capitol riot investigation (opinion)

06:05  14 january  2021
06:05  14 january  2021 Source:   cnn.com

In wake of Capitol riot, active-duty Army officer under investigation

  In wake of Capitol riot, active-duty Army officer under investigation The Army is investigating Capt. Emily Rainey’s presence at the Capitol and what she did there, said Maj. Dan Lessard. Sen. Duckworth has called for broader investigations.The Army is investigating Capt. Emily Rainey’s presence at the Capitol and what she did there, said Maj. Dan Lessard, spokesperson for 1st Special Forces Command (Airborne) at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. It is unclear if she violated any laws, he said.

at the Capitol , with many of the rioters having traveled from across the country to protest the electoral vote count that ultimately affirmed President-elect Joe Biden's Nearly 24 hours after the riots , Trump released a video condemning the violence and lawlessness at the Capitol , though he did not take any

Capitol Police officers are under investigation for their behavior during the riot ; two have been suspended. So was the storming of the Capitol a spontaneous event, or was it part of something more Sund told The Washington Post he asked six separate times. Hogan, who had approved

Six days after the siege on the US Capitol, officials from the FBI and Department of Justice held a news conference Tuesday to give an update.

a man wearing a suit and tie: FBI Washington Field Office ADIC, Steven D'Antuono speaks at a press conference on Tuesday, January 12. © Pool FBI Washington Field Office ADIC, Steven D'Antuono speaks at a press conference on Tuesday, January 12.

Normally after a major event like this -- a terrorist assault on the heart of our government -- top federal law enforcement officials would step up to give the most comprehensive account of what they know. They would move quickly to inform and reassure the public -- to tell us who did what, how it happened, and what the threat is now.

So against these standards, how did Tuesday's news conference measure up?

Fact check: Video shows Trump family in tent before Jan. 6 rally

  Fact check: Video shows Trump family in tent before Jan. 6 rally A video of the Trump family in a tent was taken prior to the president's Jan. 6 speech, not during the Capitol riot, as claimed by social media posts.The viral video, taken by Donald Trump Jr., according to CNBC, has been posted to Facebook by the page Fire Trump 2020 alongside the claim that the Trump family was allegedly "enjoying" the assault on the Capitol while it took place.

Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. Congressional investigations into the siege of the Capitol will undoubtedly include a detailed timeline of The more messages, the more there is to scrutinize —ultimately extending the life of the scandal or worse the legal liability,” she noted.

Most cases plead out which the feds love. They will do everything they can to scare you in to a plea A lot of these guys are transparent grifters but Alex Jones has got to be one of the few who has They’re all levels of dumb to believe this crap and overrun the capitol . can’t shield them from the law.

Not so well.

Goal #1: Inform and reassure the public

Perhaps the most notable part of the update was who wasn't giving it. The top officials from Justice and the FBI -- Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and Director Christopher Wray -- weren't there. Nor were other senior officials from relevant agencies like the Department of Homeland Security. Instead, we saw the assistant director in charge of the FBI's Washington office, Steve D'Antuono, and the acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Michael Sherwin.

While these two officials are no doubt the ones most closely monitoring the investigations into the insurrection, the absence of their bosses -- or even their deputies -- was unexpected, given the magnitude of the attack.

Could Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani face charges of inciting mob violence in Capitol riots?

  Could Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani face charges of inciting mob violence in Capitol riots? Legal experts say President Donald Trump and attorney Rudy Giuliani could face criminal charges for inciting the riots on Capitol Hill.The president's comments came shortly before a pro-Trump mob bashed through barricades, windows and doors, injuring police officers and temporarily occupying the Capitol building in a show of force tied to their anger over false allegations of election fraud.

The outlet even argued it was “impossible” to know how many members of Antifa existed due to its cell-like organizational structure. The NYT was attempting to “debunk” a longstanding claim that Antifa followers were dressing up as Trump supporters and committing wanton acts of violence in order to

The actor and former California governor compared the US Capitol riots to Nazi Germany. Democrats lay out their plans for removing Donald Trump from power following the riots inside the President-elect Joe Biden needs to unite his nation to fix US policy abroad, Jonathan Marcus writes.

The news conference focused almost exclusively on the investigation into the attack -- on the crime-solving. It is, of course, the Justice Department's job to gather evidence, track down suspects and bring perpetrators to justice.

We learned from D'Antuono that the FBI was treating the Capitol attack the same way it would an international terrorist incident, and that it had opened 170 "subject files" (referring to individuals identified as persons who potentially committed crimes), and of those has charged more than 70 individuals.

Sherwin emphasized that each perpetrator will be charged with the most severe crime warranted, including and up to seditious conspiracy.

But both officials appeared to skirt around explaining what federal law enforcement knew and did before that day's Trump rally and the attack that followed it, in particular how the feds had coordinated with other agencies to prepare for trouble.

Inauguration Day 2021: What now? Capitol riots, Trump supporter threats prompt safety concerns

  Inauguration Day 2021: What now? Capitol riots, Trump supporter threats prompt safety concerns The inauguration of a new president, set for Jan. 20, typically poses one of the most enormous security challenges. What does that mean after a riot?The inauguration of a new president, set for Jan. 20, typically poses one of the most enormous security challenges for the federal government and local police, as former presidents and foreign dignitaries gather to observe what – until Wednesday – represented the peaceful transfer of power at the very Capitol that was overrun.

The US House of Representatives has impeached President Donald Trump for "incitement of Following Mr Trump's remarks, his supporters broke into the Capitol , forcing lawmakers to suspend A two-thirds majority is needed to convict Mr Trump, meaning at least 17 Republicans would have to

FBI Says pre- capitol riots intelligence LED to proud boys leader's arrest. He declined to say whether he entered the Capitol . " A lot of stuff happened that day," Pham told the Get all the stories you need - to -know from the most powerful name in news delivered first thing every

Nor did they mention the threat bulletin now issued to all 50 states warning of armed protests planned at every state's capitol and in Washington in the days leading up to the inauguration on January 20.

Goal #2: Stop misinformation and conspiracy theories by offering facts

Many Americans are wondering how this attack was allowed to happen. Since 9/11, law enforcement has greatly increased its abilities to sniff out and disrupt developing terrorism plots. The FBI most recently thwarted an apparent plan by militia groups to kidnap and kill the governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer, in October.

It is hard to understand how -- particularly in light of the many threats of violence made openly by pro-Trump groups and individuals on social media -- the FBI and its law enforcement partners were not better prepared for what took place.

Unfortunately, neither D'Antuono nor Sherwin offered much in the way of explanation. To be sure, law enforcement is often unable to comment on things that might compromise ongoing investigations. But if that is the case, they normally just say that. On Tuesday, however, D'Antuono puzzlingly acknowledged that the FBI had information from its Norfolk field office indicating plans for violence at the Capitol.

More than half of Americans believe Trump should be removed before Jan. 20, according to poll

  More than half of Americans believe Trump should be removed before Jan. 20, according to poll A poll published Sunday by ABC News/Ipsos found that 56% of respondents believe President Donald Trump should be removed from office before Jan. 20.The poll, published Sunday by ABC News/Ipsos, found that 56% of respondents support his removal prior to Inauguration Day and 67% blame Trump for the attack on Jan. 6, which forced lawmakers to flee their chambers and left five dead.

This contradicted his earlier claim to reporters, Friday, that the FBI did not have any such information in its possession at all before the attack. Nor did he explain why the Norfolk tip was not followed up on after the Joint Terrorism Task Force received it.

By not filling in these gaps, or even stating clearly that the FBI was reviewing all of the intelligence that was known beforehand, the officials invited more speculation about whether the government's flat-footed response to the Capitol assault was caused by negligence or -- far worse -- an intentional intelligence failure.

They missed an opportunity to be as robust as possible in laying out how law enforcement approached this highly publicized rally, and potentially contributed to a further erosion of trust in law enforcement and the proliferation of unfounded conspiracy theories.

Goal #3: Deter future violence by sending a strong message

Many members of the Capitol mob were undoubtedly watching the news conference to find out what the FBI knew. On this front, both officials sent a clear message that they would use every resource at their disposal to identify and prosecute everyone who attacked the seat of our democracy.

Make no mistake: The people who planned and participated in this atrocity will get a knock on their doors from the FBI soon enough.

Fact check: Viral images compare handling of Black Lives Matter protests and Capitol riot

  Fact check: Viral images compare handling of Black Lives Matter protests and Capitol riot Posts on social media use images to compare law enforcement's treatment of Black Lives Matter protests with the Capitol breach.As the events unfolded, many on social media shared images purporting to show the stark divide between law enforcement's handling of the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests compared to the Trump supporters who violently stormed the Capitol.

But the domestic terror threat is not limited to that one mob. The very fact that the FBI has issued a threat bulletin to all 50 states reveals that the depraved ideology based on the lie about the "rigged" election spreads far and deep.

But neither D'Antuono nor Sherwin addressed this future threat, issued a warning to anyone planning violence, or even referred to the people involved in this violence as domestic terrorists.

This may be because they have seen how the President reacts when such language is used against his defenders and allies. After all, neither the FBI nor the DOJ can afford, in this critical moment, to lose their leadership because Trump decided to fire them. Unfortunately, if that fear is what resulted in the gaps in yesterday's remarks, it may embolden the very people they are protecting us against.

Melanie Kannokada smiling for the camera: Asha Rangappa © courtesy Yale Law School Asha Rangappa

Fact check: False claim of facial recognition of antifa members during U.S. Capitol riot .
Facial recognition software firm XRVision has refuted a now-retracted story that its product matched rioters at the U.S. Capitol to members of antifa.A mob of violent Trump supporters swarmed the Capitol, interrupting a joint congressional session to certify the 2020 election results, USA TODAY reported.

usr: 0
This is interesting!