US Is there really a ‘science of reading’ that tells us exactly how to teach kids to read?

18:47  26 january  2021
18:47  26 january  2021 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Biden elevates science advisor to cabinet role for the first time

  Biden elevates science advisor to cabinet role for the first time Science is poised to get a much more prominent role in President-elect Biden’s administration. Nature and Reuters report that Biden has named breakthrough geneticist Eric Lander (seen above in 2002) not only as the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, but will make him the first Presidential Science Advisor to have a cabinet-level role. This reflects a desire to have science “at the forefront” of the administration, according to Biden. © William B. Plowman via Getty Images 402293 03: Dr.

Kids who are not reading at grade level in first grade almost invariably remain poor fourth grade First grade teacher Angela DiStefano, a 12-year teaching veteran, says the Literacy How approach to Seven tips for reading success. Remember that learning to read and to read very well are crucial to

Teaching children to read is one of the most complicated, arduous and time-consuming parts of The information is codified, as we must be able to recognise which symbols make which sounds in order When a child is learning to read there are crucial things to learn: how the sounds are represented by

One of the longest-running education debates — commonly referred to as a war — has been over how to teach reading. It started in the 1800s, when Horace Mann, often called “the father of public education” in the United States, argued against teaching the explicit sounds of each letter. He worried that students would concentrate on sounding out words rather than learning how to read for comprehension, so he argued that students should learn to read whole words instead.

a young girl sitting at a table using a laptop: (iStock) © iStock /iStock (iStock)

Thus began the fight over teaching phonics or “whole language” — and more recently what is known as “balanced literacy.” We’ve also been hearing declarations that a “science of reading” proves that employing phonics in a particular war is the best and right path to teach young children how to read.

Biden announces new science team, elevates office to Cabinet

  Biden announces new science team, elevates office to Cabinet Eric Lander will head the Office of Science and Technology Policy if confirmed by the Senate."We’re going to lead with science and truth," Biden said at a speech introducing his new appointees in Delaware on Saturday. "We believe in both.

How to teach reading – Pre- reading activities – While reading activities – Post- reading activities. Some reading procedure. The above definition is deficient. It does not mention that reading has a purpose. We usually read for a purpose. For example, people read to follow instructions, to find

- To know how to teach reading , - To know about pupils' mistakes in reading and how correct them. Topicality of the research paper: the present time there is a necessity for both learners and teachers of English teaching departments to learn non-traditional ways of reading .

The following post looks at this broad issue and whether there really is a “science of reading” that has finally settled how reading should be taught.

It was written by David Reinking, professor emeritus at Clemson University and a former president of the Literacy Research Association; Victoria J. Risko, professor emerita at Vanderbilt University and a former president of the International Literacy Association; and George G. Hruby, an associate research professor of literacy and executive director of the Collaborative Center for Literacy Development at the University of Kentucky.

By David Reinking, Victoria J. Risko and George G. Hruby

Public debates about how to teach children to read have erupted periodically for decades. We are now in another cycle of those debates. Mainstream news sources are reporting, and in some cases fueling, the latest installment of the “reading wars.” More worrisome, a majority of states have enacted, or are considering, new laws mandating how reading must be taught and setting narrow criteria for labeling students as reading disabled.

How I’m teaching my Black children to thrive in a world that isn’t fair

  How I’m teaching my Black children to thrive in a world that isn’t fair The Capitol riot provided a reminder about the dual worlds inhabited in America: one Black, one White. They asked me: How can the mostly White crowd storm the U.S. Capitol with so few arrests? (Capitol Police made 14 arrests that day, and D.C. police had arrested 69 people by the next morning, most on curfew and unlawful entry charges.) Why was the police presence so apparent for the protests after George Floyd was killed? (During the June 1 Black Lives Matter protests, D.C. police arrested 289 people, many of them on curfew violation charges that were later dropped.

You can also quickly and easily teach your kid to " really " read and "decode" ALL English words and sentences -NOT just memorize some word shapes!- and

Teaching someone how to read is an extremely rewarding experience. Whether you're teaching your child to read their first book or helping a friend He studies how children teach each other and how to train effective peer teachers . Before beginning his PhD, he was a middle school teacher in Oakland

Since last March, the pandemic, the struggling economy, the movement for racial justice, November’s presidential election and the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol have all muted attention to these issues. But, they are again gaining traction, and with a new twist.

Parents who have had to take on their children’s reading instruction at home are asking more questions and seeking informed advice. Marketers of some instructional materials have taken advantage of the situation offering ready-made, and sometimes overly promised, solutions. So, the debates about early reading instruction have a renewed immediacy.

This latest flare-up taps familiar themes. First, reasonable differences among qualified professionals are framed as a war between opposing factions. Second, phonics, as an approach to teaching reading, is a flash point. Finally, mainstream educators are portrayed as purveyors, or clueless victims, of conspiratorial resistance to scientific evidence. The latter theme is sometimes punctuated with anecdotes from distraught parents who have been led to believe that their children are being betrayed by an unenlightened educational establishment.

This is America: Teach Black history from Black perspectives

  This is America: Teach Black history from Black perspectives We can talk about this country’s history of racism while also celebrating the social justice work done by so many in the Black community.Looking back, I realize that a huge portion of my Black history education started at home.

Look into the IELTS Reading Actual Test 1 in 2016 with Answer Key and upgrade your reading skills which SECURE posted two well-trained staff in Punukula to teach and help everyone in the village, and Exactly how ancient these skills are is difficult to determine. Only by studying the numerical

Reading illustrated storybooks to your child is a great way to develop language, as every page is supported by visual clues. There is a huge difference between being exposed to a language and learning a language. Traditionally, when we think about learning a language, we think of our grammar

The straw man in the new round of the reading wars

These themes make for a compelling journalistic narrative and they can benefit for-profit interests outside mainstream education, particularly during a pandemic when many parents are seeking help teaching reading at home. But, they also obscure established evidence that teaching reading is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor. Overlooked is the common ground shared by those who draw different conclusions on the finer points of available research.

Phonics is the prime example. Few legitimate experts on teaching reading oppose teaching children phonics. Despite a timeworn narrative, there is no sharply drawn battle line dividing experts who completely support or completely oppose phonics.

Instead, reasonable differences exist along a continuum. On one end are those who see phonics as the foundation of learning to read for all students. To them, phonics — lots of it — is the essential ingredient that insures success for all students learning to read, and it must be mastered before other dimensions of reading are taught.

Kelly Rowland Welcomes Second Child, Son Noah Jon: 'We Are Truly Grateful'

  Kelly Rowland Welcomes Second Child, Son Noah Jon: 'We Are Truly Grateful' Kelly Rowland and husband Tim Weatherspoon are already parents to son Titan Jewell, 6The "Coffee" singer, 39, welcomed her second child with husband Tim Weatherspoon, son Noah Jon, she announced on Saturday.

On the other end are those who see phonics as only one among many dimensions of learning to read — one that gains potency when integrated with meaningfully engaged reading and writing, with vocabulary and language development, with instruction aimed at increasing comprehension and fluency, and so forth. (For an extended discussion, click on this.)

Underlying that continuum is the question of whether a deficiency in phonics is at the root of virtually all reading difficulties, or whether, like many medical conditions (e.g., heart disease), those difficulties have multiple etiologies, including external factors, such as impoverished school resources to support students.

There are also reasonable professional differences about what phonics instruction should look like, how much of it is necessary, for whom, under what circumstances, and how it connects with other aspects of reading. But there is no justification for characterizing these differences as a “reading war” between those who believe in phonics and those who don’t.

There are other notable points of agreement. One is that phonics is not real reading. It is aptly referred to as “decoding,” because it teaches beginning readers to decipher letters into speech sounds. As such, it is a consciously applied, temporarily useful, set of technical skills that are, at best, a gateway to real reading for meaning, understanding, learning, and enjoyment. Phonics is a means to an end and only useful to the extent that it leads to real reading.

OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Court tosses Trump EPA's 'secret science' rule | Biden signals major shift on regulations | Exxon, Chevron discussed merger last year: report

  OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Court tosses Trump EPA's 'secret science' rule | Biden signals major shift on regulations | Exxon, Chevron discussed merger last year: report HAPPY MONDAY! Welcome to Overnight Energy, The Hill's roundup of the latest energy and environment news. Please send tips and comments to Rebecca Beitsch at rbeitsch@thehill.com. Follow her on Twitter: @rebeccabeitsch. Reach Rachel Frazin at rfrazin@thehill.com or follow her on Twitter: @RachelFrazin.Signup for our newsletter and others HERE. CAN'T KEEP A SECRET (SCIENCE RULE): A federal court has vacated the Trump administration's "secretSignup for our newsletter and others HERE.

It is relatively easy to find measurable increases in decoding ability after phonics instruction. However, establishing a causal relation between approaches to phonics instruction and gains in real reading has been more elusive. Prominent studies across decades have failed to do so convincingly. One example is a critical review of several meta-analyses (comprehensive statistical analyses of effects across hundreds of studies), which was published recently in a highly regarded, peer-reviewed journal. It found no clear advantage for programs with a strong emphasis on phonics compared to those foregrounding other approaches (click on this).

It is tempting to misappropriate science in claiming a higher ground in an argument, especially one framed as a war. Unfortunately, some have naively suggested that science has unequivocally resolved how reading must be taught to every child and that those who disagree are science deniers.

Not only is that conclusion unwarranted, it is quintessentially unscientific. Among scientists, scientific certainty is an oxymoron and the bar for even approaching certainty is extremely high. The science of reading is more about reducing ignorance than finding ultimate, immutable truths applicable to every child. In the reading wars, scientific certainty is often used rhetorically to deny reasonable differences and cut off healthy debate, turning science into scientism.

There are also reasonable differences about what scientific findings are most relevant and useful to teaching reading, again along a continuum.

Teachers to Biden: What we want from your administration

  Teachers to Biden: What we want from your administration Here's an open letter from three teachers with a list of education recommendations for the new administration. In this post, three educators who have decades of cumulative experience teaching students and teachers spell out where they hope the new administration will go in helping schools provide an education to all students that, as they explain, “is relevant and engages them in things that matter.

On one end are those who turn mainly to research in disciplines such as neurology, cognitive science, and linguistics; others turn mainly to research focusing on educational factors directly related to instructional outcomes.

In any event, educators need to know more than what works pedagogically across many students in general. They need to know why it works, and what contextual and individual factors may qualify general findings. Such research is analogous to medical trials that determine not just the overall effectiveness of a drug, but its side effects, including those that are dangerous for patients with certain conditions.

Brain researchers and psychologists have cautioned against building bridges too far between their work and educational practice. One, Daniel Willingham, has stated the issue succinctly, “As one gets more distant from the desired level of analysis (the child in the classroom), the probability of learning anything useful diminishes.”

Put another way, there is an underlying “science” of everything. For example, chemistry is at the root of cooking, and physics underlies driving a car, but they play a limited role in teaching a chef to prepare palate-pleasing food or a teenager to drive safely to the grocery store.

Likewise, many decisions about teaching reading are necessarily practical and informed only marginally by the science of underlying reading processes. Phonics, again, is a good example. English is among the most irregularly spelled languages. (For a satirical rendering, click on this). Further, the most frequently used words in English — words that appear often, even in simple texts, and thus that children cannot avoid — have a high percentage of ambiguous or irregular letter-to-sound spellings.

For example, why isn’t “to” pronounced like “so” and “go”? What about “have” compared to “save,” or comparing “one,” “done,” and “lone”? Or, “some” and “home”? Frequent words like these can quickly muddy the phonics waters.

Thus, many educators reasonably teach a small set of high-frequency, irregularly spelled words as special cases. Doing so is a practical, sensible pedagogical decision, not one that is anti-phonics, taking sides in a war, or, necessarily justified by scientific evidence about the brain’s role in reading.

Another issue is that in an irregularly spelled language like English, teaching phonics often means introducing children to specialized vocabulary, including terms and concepts such as the following: vowel, consonant, long and short sounds, split/consonant/vowel digraphs, blends, clusters, schwa sound, diphthongs, silent letters, open/closed syllables, hard and soft sounds, r-controlled vowels, etc. The need for these terms reflects the complexity English spelling, adding a conceptual burden to teaching and learning phonics and raising a question about when phonics instruction may have diminishing returns.

Another issue is dialect. In some areas of the southern United States, for example, there may be little, if any, difference between the pronunciation of the word “wheel” and “will.” There are also students who hear, and often may be taught to read, a language other than English at home.

These are only a few examples of the complex issues that popularized narratives about a “reading war” obscure. When the teaching of reading is framed as a war, nuance and common areas of agreement are casualties.

But worse, our children can become innocent victims caught in a no man’s land between those more interested in winning a conflict than in meeting individual needs.

5 ways the Biden administration may help stem the loss of international students .
Over the past four years, the Trump administration made it increasingly difficult for students from other countries to study in the United States. In 2017, the number of new international students enrolled at American colleges and universities – that is, those just coming to the U.S. for the first time – declined for the first year on record. Restrictive immigration policies, frayed relations with foreign nations and travel bans all contributed to further drops in new enrollment over each of the following years of Trump’s presidency. President Joe Biden’s election signals a new day for international education.

usr: 1
This is interesting!