US Affirmative action opponents ask U.S. Supreme Court to take up Harvard case
New round of GOP gerrymandering in Southern states could be the most racist yet
Republicans will try to gerrymander their way to power across the South (again) — are Democrats ready to fight? Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Mario Tama/Getty Images
By Nate Raymond
BOSTON (Reuters) - Opponents of policies used by universities to increase their numbers of Black and Hispanic students asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to prohibit Harvard University's consideration of race in undergraduate admissions in a case that could end such affirmative action programs.
Students for Fair Admissions, a group founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, asked the justices to hear its appeal of a lower court ruling upholding Harvard's race-conscious admissions. A lawsuit backed by Blum accused Harvard of discriminating against Asian-American applicants.
Supreme Court to decide if Arizona voting regulations are racist
The Supreme Court in early March will hear arguments in a voting rights case pitting Republican arguments about election integrity against Democratic claims of racial discrimination. © Provided by Washington Examiner The case arose out of a dispute between the Arizona Republican Party and the Democratic National Committee and has been working its way through lower courts since before the 2016 presidential election. It has attracted increasing attention since the muddled aftermath of the 2020 election, in which many states flooded the Supreme Court with complaints about pandemic-era voting provisions.
Blum previously backed a lawsuit by a white woman challenging the affirmative action admissions policies of the University of Texas, leading to a 2016 Supreme Court ruling upholding the consideration of race in college admissions.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in November ruled in favor of Harvard, deciding that the Ivy League school's consideration of race was not "impermissibly extensive" and was "meaningful" because it prevented racial diversity from plummeting. A federal judge also ruled in favor of Harvard in 2019.
Legal experts have said the appeal offers the Supreme Court a possible vehicle to end more than four decades of allowing race as a factor in higher education admissions. Now with a 6-3 conservative majority, the court has moved rightward since the 2016 ruling.
Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records from Manhattan prosecutor
After a four-month delay, the court denied the former president’s motion in a one-sentence order with no recorded dissents. District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. has won every stage of the legal fight — including the first round at the Supreme Court — but has yet to receive the records he says are necessary for a grand jury investigation into whether the president’s companies violated state law. Vance responded to the court decision with a three-word tweet: “The work continues.
"It is our hope that the justices will accept this case and finally end the consideration of race and ethnicity in college admissions," Blum said in a statement.
Affirmative action is a policy under which racial minorities historically subject to discrimination are given certain preferences in education and employment.
Blum's group, which includes Asian-Americans who were denied admission, argued that Harvard's actions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars racial discrimination under any program receiving federal financial assistance.
Harvard in a statement said its admissions policies are consistent with Supreme Court precedent and it would defend its right "to seek the educational benefits that come from bringing together a diverse group of students."
Blum's group sued Harvard in 2014, accusing it of impermissible "racial balancing" to make it easier for Blacks and Hispanics to win admission at the expense of Asian-American applicants, and did not narrowly tailor its use of race.
Supreme Court asked to hear challenge to Harvard's race-based admissions policy
A group opposed to Harvard's affirmative action policy asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to take up its lawsuit challenging the use of race in higher education admissions decisions. The conservative-backed group Students for Fair Admissions urged the justices to hear its appeal in a suit alleging that Harvard's policy illegally discriminates against Asian American applicants.If the 6-3 conservative court agrees to hear the case, it could tee up a landmark showdown over whether colleges can promote on-campus diversity by considering the racial makeup of its student body.In its petition, Students for Fair Admissions asks the court to overturn Grutter v.
Students for Fair Admissions separately on Thursday sued Yale University, arguing that its race-conscious undergraduate admissions practices discriminated against Asian and white applicants.
The U.S. Justice Department on Feb. 3, two weeks after Democrat Joe Biden became president, dropped a similar lawsuit that had been filed against Yale by Republican former President Donald Trump's administration.
Yale in a statement said it remains committed to assembling a diverse student body. It said the lawsuit "resurrects the misleading statistics, factual errors, and legal misstatements that the Trump administration included in its suit."
Many U.S. universities maintain affirmative action programs in admissions, arguing that having a sizable number of minorities enrolled exposes students to varied perspectives and enhances the educational experience for all students.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham and Lisa Shumaker)
Cornel West leaving Harvard amid dispute over tenure position .
Philosopher and activist Cornel West announced on Monday that he is leaving Harvard University’s Divinity School.West announced on Twitter that he will be moving to Union Theological Seminary in New York City.