•   
  •   
  •   

US Barrett authors first U.S. Supreme Court ruling, a loss for environmentalists

06:05  08 march  2021
06:05  08 march  2021 Source:   reuters.com

California County Counsel 'Disappointed' Over SCOTUS Decision to Resume Indoor Worship

  California County Counsel 'Disappointed' Over SCOTUS Decision to Resume Indoor Worship On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled that Santa Clara County, California, could not enforce a ban on indoor worship services due to the coronavirus pandemic.On Friday, the high court ruled that Santa Clara County could not enforce a ban on indoor religious worship, bypassing the county's decision to restrict all indoor activity. Now, churches can resume indoor services while they await a decision in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Fox News reported.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday authored her first ruling since joining the U . S . Supreme Court in October - a decision that handed a defeat to an environmental group that had sought access to government documents. In the 7-2 ruling , the justices sided with the U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service, thwarting the Sierra Club' s bid to obtain documents concerning a regulation finalized in 2014 relating to power plants. Barrett and the court ' s other five conservative justices were joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan in the majority, with liberals Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor in

Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday authored her first ruling since joining the U . S . Supreme Court in October as the court handed a defeat to an environmental group seeking access to government documents. In 2013, the agency initially found that the regulation would put the species in jeopardy but its final recommendation to the Environmental Protection Agency in 2014 reached the opposite conclusion. Writing for the court , Barrett said the 2013 draft documents were protected from disclosure because "they reflect a preliminary view - not a final decision - about the

By Lawrence Hurley

FILE PHOTO: Senate holds confirmation hearing for Amy Coney Barrett to be Supreme Court Justice © Reuters/POOL FILE PHOTO: Senate holds confirmation hearing for Amy Coney Barrett to be Supreme Court Justice

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday authored her first ruling since joining the U.S. Supreme Court in October - a decision that handed a defeat to an environmental group that had sought access to government documents.

In the 7-2 ruling, the justices sided with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, thwarting the Sierra Club's bid to obtain documents concerning a regulation finalized in 2014 relating to power plants. Barrett and the court's other five conservative justices were joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan in the majority, with liberals Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor in dissent.

Supreme Court faces landmark challenge on voting rights

  Supreme Court faces landmark challenge on voting rights The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday over a set of Arizona voting restrictions alleged to be racially discriminatory in a dispute that could set the most important voting rights precedent in nearly a decade.A potentially landmark ruling in coming months may determine whether a suite of voting curbs working their way through GOP state legislatures across the country will survive legal scrutiny before the pivotal 2022 midterms and the next race for the White House. For the 6-3 conservative majority court, the case marks a first chance to define the sweep of a key provision of the Voting Rights Act (VRA).

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday authored her first ruling since joining the U . S . Supreme Court in October as the court handed a defeat to an environmental group seeking access to government documents. In the 7-2 ruling , the justices sided with the U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service, thwarting an effort by the Sierra Club to obtain documents concerning a regulation finalized in 2014 relating to power plants. Barrett and the court ' s other five conservative justices were joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan in the majority, with liberals Justices

Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday authored her first ruling since joining the U . S . Supreme Court in October - a decision that handed a defeat to an environmental group that had sought access to government documents.

The Senate approved Barrett for a lifetime job on the top U.S. judicial body on Oct. 26 after a contentious and accelerated confirmation process in the weeks before the Nov. 3 presidential election. She is one of three justices appointed by Republican former President Donald Trump and she replaced liberal Justice Ruther Bader Ginsburg, who died on Sept. 18.

Trump touted Barrett's appointment during campaign rallies ahead of the election, which he lost to Democratic President Joe Biden. Her swift confirmation by the Senate, which at the time was controlled by Trump's fellow Republicans but is now led by the Democrats, moved the court further to the right and deprived Biden of an opportunity to replace Ginsburg with a liberal successor.

Supreme Court wrestles with voting rights and race discrimination

  Supreme Court wrestles with voting rights and race discrimination The Supreme Court is weighing whether and how to impose limits on a key part of the Voting Rights Act meant to combat racial discrimination in state election laws. Your browser does not support this video During oral arguments in a case out of Arizona, conducted via teleconference because of the pandemic, the justices grappled with how to interpret and enforce Section 2 of the act, which says any measure which "results in a denial or abridgment" of voting rights "on account of race or color" is illegal. "The language is very clear.

(Reuters) - The United States on Monday began requiring antibody tests for the new coronavirus to undergo a regulatory agency review, acknowledging that its earlier policy had opened the door to fraud. The U . S . Food and Drug Administration had previously required only that companies attest their product was valid and labeled as unapproved, attracting 170 companies to the antibody test market including unscrupulous vendors making false claims, Reuters reported last week. Barrett authors first U . S . Supreme Court ruling , a loss for environmentalists .

The Supreme Court has dismissed three pending appeals on former President Donald Trump' s effort to withhold millions of dollars in law enforcement funds from states and cities that refused to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, meaning it will not rule on whether the policy was lawful. Barrett authors first Supreme Court ruling , a loss for environmentalists .

The ruling in the Sierra Club case limited the scope of U.S. agency documents that would be subject to a federal law called the Freedom of Information Act, which lets people request certain government materials.

The group wanted access to internal documents concerning the Fish and Wildlife Service's conclusion that a proposed environmental regulation for cooling water intake structures that are used by power plants and other industrial facilities would not adversely affect endangered species, including fish, turtles and shellfish.

The agency initially found in 2013 that the regulation would put the species in jeopardy but its final recommendation to the Environmental Protection Agency in 2014 made the opposite conclusion.

Writing for the court, Barrett said the 2013 draft documents were protected from disclosure because "they reflect a preliminary view - not a final decision - about the likely effect of the EPA's proposed rule on endangered species."

Barrett authors first Supreme Court majority opinion against environmental group

  Barrett authors first Supreme Court majority opinion against environmental group Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday issued her first majority opinion since joining the Supreme Court in October, siding against an environmental group that sought access to government records.In the 7-2 ruling, Barrett wrote that the records detailing internal agency deliberations did not need to be turned over under a federal public disclosure law. The five other conservatives and liberal Justice Elena Kagan joined Barrett's opinion, withIn the 7-2 ruling, Barrett wrote that the records detailing internal agency deliberations did not need to be turned over under a federal public disclosure law.

Under the CARES Act that gave the U . S . aviation sector a billion bailout to cover payroll, airlines cannot force any involuntary furloughs before October and have been trying to encourage employees to accept voluntary exit deals. Major aviation unions have asked the U . S . Congress to consider extending the payroll support package through March. Barrett authors first U . S . Supreme Court ruling , a loss for environmentalists .

An appeals court overturned that injunction in April, and Barr announced new execution dates for July and August of four inmates, all men convicted murdering children: Lee, Wesley Purkey, Dustin Honken and Keith Nelson. Purkey' s execution was scheduled for Wednesday, but a federal appeals court issued a temporary stay this month and it was not clear whether it would proceed. Barrett authors first U . S . Supreme Court ruling , a loss for environmentalists .

A federal judge in California ruled in 2017 that 11 documents had to be disclosed. Trump's administration appealed and the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2018 ruled partly for the government but still found that nine documents had to be released.

After the ruling, Sierra Club lawyer Elena Saxonhouse said the documents "were meant to - and did - determine subsequent agency actions" and therefore should have been disclosed.

"We're encouraged by the Supreme Court's affirmation that courts must inquire into the specific context of draft documents before allowing agencies to withhold them from the public," Saxonhouse added.

The case was argued the day before the election. It marked Barrett's first arguments as a justice. She previously served on a lower federal appeals court and as a legal scholar at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana.

So far, Barrett's biggest impact on the court came when she provided the decisive vote in favor of religious entities challenging COVID-19 restrictions in New York.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

Could Woody Allen Be Prosecuted for Alleged Sexual Assault of Dylan Farrow After All These Years? We Answer This and Other Legal Questions Raised by HBO’s ‘Allen v. Farrow’ .
Shortly after Farrow's 1992 allegations that Allen sexually abused Dylan, Allen filed a lawsuit for custody in New York State. Allen and Farrow were not married, so the custody case proceeded as a stand-alone legal matter in civil court. The court held a seven-week trial, during which it reviewed both direct evidence and expert reports submitted by the parties. Woody Allen testified that he believed Mia Farrow had "brainwashed" Dylan intoThe central subject is Allen’s alleged sexual assault of Dylan Farrow, his adopted daughter with actress Mia Farrow. Specifically, that after years of carrying on an obsessive and inappropriate relationship with Dylan, Allen molested her when she was 7 years old.

usr: 7
This is interesting!