•   
  •   
  •   

US 6 Bold Ideas for Gun Reform That Could Actually Happen

08:40  30 march  2021
08:40  30 march  2021 Source:   politico.com

Colorado, Latest Gun Control Battleground, Already Has Tough Gun Laws

  Colorado, Latest Gun Control Battleground, Already Has Tough Gun Laws Colorado is in the top 16 of states with the strictest gun control laws, according to gun reform advocacy group the Giffords Law Center.The mass shooting at the King Soopers supermarket in Boulder, Colorado was the latest in a long line of fatal shootings that have devastated the state since the 1999 Columbine High School shooting. Some of the past incidents have prompted state lawmakers to pass new gun control measures intended to prevent future shootings.

Gun violence prevention advocates are rallying behind these state and local-level initiatives that don't count on major action from the federal government. Buttons reading, "Stop gun violence," sit on the ground at a gun reform rally at the Colorado State Capitol in Denver, Colo. | In the wake of back-to-back mass casualty shootings in Colorado and Georgia, President Joe Biden reiterated his support for legislation to expand background checks and ban assault weapons. For many gun violence prevention advocates, the emphasis on these reforms — ideas that have been floated after every major tragedy

That idea is gun licensing. In a licensing — or “permit to purchase” — system, nobody could buy a gun without first getting some kind of card or certificate (in other words, a license) from local or state authorities. And to get that license, a potential buyer would have to satisfy a few conditions, like A Massachusetts-style system could invite a challenge in the courts, although the provision requiring officers to justify denials in writing to a court and giving applicants the right to appeal might be enough to satisfy judges worried about Second Amendment rights. But the immediate obstacle to a licensing

In the wake of back-to-back mass casualty shootings in Colorado and Georgia, President Joe Biden reiterated his support for legislation to expand background checks and ban assault weapons. For many gun violence prevention advocates, the emphasis on these reforms—ideas that have been floated after every major tragedy since Sandy Hook—isn’t especially encouraging. It’s not that they aren’t welcome proposals (a majority of Americans still support both), it’s that advocates are tired of waiting—and they now see opportunity to make progress, perhaps even have a bigger impact, through a variety of other initiatives that don’t depend on Congress.

Gabby Giffords on Boulder shooting: Listen to Biden. Pass new laws to stop gun violence.

  Gabby Giffords on Boulder shooting: Listen to Biden. Pass new laws to stop gun violence. Ten lives were stolen at a grocery store not so different from the grocery store where I was shot and six people were murdered in Tucson 10 years ago.Ten lives were lost in Boulder Monday, including a police officer. Ten lives stolen at a grocery store not so different from the grocery store where I was shot and six people were murdered in Tucson, Arizona, 10 years ago.

Calls for gun control and gun reform came quickly after last Monday’s mass shooting at a King Soopers market in Boulder, Colo. They always do following such incidents, which happen with horrifying frequency. “I’ve been instructed by Senator (Chuck) Schumer to work over the next several weeks with Democrats and willing Republicans to try to get a bill that expands background checks that can pass, that can get votes from both sides. Don’t count us out,” Murphy said. Such legislation would likely have the support of voters.

Can ’t say I have ever seen and effective gun reform of any that are in place or any that are proposed. There might be 1% in there but as there are so many and they very so much its hard to say on that 1%. Course my criteria is not hurting law abiding citizens and cutting down on all violent crime. Fanciful ideas of how a law might be useful are not a reasonable basis for a law. As an example, I saw a question earlier today about a registry. Gun registration is the norm in many countries, and is generally passed as a crime control measure. But there’s very little evidence that it actually does deter crime

calendar: Buttons reading, © Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images Buttons reading, "Stop gun violence," sit on the ground at a gun reform rally at the Colorado State Capitol in Denver, Colo.

Here are some of those ideas—proposals that range widely but have one thing in common: they're state and local-level initiatives that don't count on major action from the federal government.

1. Protecting home rule from state preemption

Since the 1980s, the NRA has been lobbying state legislatures to strip cities and counties of the authority to enact their own municipal gun ordinances. This type of legislation is called preemption, and it’s pervasive—there are now broad firearms preemption laws in 43 states.

Once a preemption law is passed, the National Rifle Association or other gun rights groups can sue a city over ordinances already on the books (banning guns in bars or prohibiting open carry in city parks, for example). Any gun regulation that exceeds state law becomes a potentially expensive liability. Because rural areas are disproportionately represented in state legislatures, this tactic has enabled red states to keep their blue cities in check. Indeed, firearms preemption bills have become so popular in Republican strongholds that lawmakers have adapted that model to other areas of regulation. (Texas, for example, has used preemption laws to undermine big-city bans on fracking and single-use plastic bags.)

After Mass Shootings, Joe Biden Faces Pressure to Act on Gun Control

  After Mass Shootings, Joe Biden Faces Pressure to Act on Gun Control In the wake of two deadly shooting sprees in Atlanta and Boulder, calls for gun control from both activists and members of Biden's own party are already intensifying. The question now is whether Biden can deliver on his promises. “The Administration is dealing with many crises. We knew that when they came in,” says Shannon Watts, who founded the advocacy group Moms Demand Action. “But at this point, gun violence is a pandemic within a pandemic. And we do need the Administration to act.

Rep Seth Moulton encourages people to call politicians and push for gun control on Twitter.

You can talk about expanding the use of body cameras for police officers. You can talk about better training and reforming police culture to root out bad actors. None of this is to suggest that gun reforms will solve our problems in policing. They must be paired with overdue structural and cultural changes needed to excise the bad behavior in law enforcement. That should include the demilitarization of police, a greater investment in local social services and a national reconciliation effort in communities plagued with officer-involved violence.

In a statement released after the Boulder shooting, Colorado Ceasefire only mentioned one state legislative priority: “The Colorado General Assembly must act, now, to repeal the state pre-emption law.”

Is there any appetite, though, among Republican state representatives to reverse course on preemption? Historically, home rule was a conservative idea, so it stands to reason that some Republicans might be persuadable. That turned out to be the case in Nebraska, where gun violence prevention advocates have recently defeated two firearms preemption bills.

“Nebraska, despite being a super-majority Republican-led state, is often centrist and populist in a lot of ways that matter,” said Melody Vaccaro, executive director of Nebraskans Against Gun Violence. “We could really point to very specific examples and tell people ‘this is what preemption does, it takes away your ability to sort these things out,’” Vaccaro explained. “We were able to call one little town, and say ‘Hey, you know, you have this ordinance that says people can’t shoot guns in cemeteries. The state’s trying to take away your ability to have a rule like that.’ Communities know what’s best for them, even on guns.”

Lauren Boebert Argues 'No Gun Laws' Would Have Stopped Ahmad Alissa

  Lauren Boebert Argues 'No Gun Laws' Would Have Stopped Ahmad Alissa The Colorado representative defended the carrying of weapons, telling Newsmax "bad people do bad things."The Colorado congresswoman, a noted pro-gun advocate, told Newsmax that "there are bad people who do bad things, and we need a way to protect ourselves.

And if even some of these policy ideas get turned into actual legislation, they could transform the student debt landscape and our entire system of financing education. Here are some bold ideas to watch for during the next year and a half. Watch for reforms that rein in student loan servicers and debt collectors via a national Student Loan Bill of Rights – modeled on bills currently pending in states like New York and Massachusetts. In addition, look for oversight initiatives that target colleges and universities (and in particular, for-profit schools) and tie graduation and employment outcomes to

We’ re going to wrap up the blog now, you can see our full story about the gun laws announcement here. A reminder of what happened this afternoon: Jacinda Ardern announced sweeping an immediate changes to New Zealand’s gun laws, including the banning of assault rifles and military-style semi-automatics, following the Christchurch mosque shootings. “I can tell you that every available armed resource responded so quickly to that event and our people acted with absolute courage with in 20 minutes to intervene with that person and bring them into custody.

2. Make gun training more meaningful

Many states have gradually lowered the bar to obtain a permit to carry a handgun in public places. The trends have been toward fewer hours of classroom instruction (reduced in some cases to zero), eliminating shooting requirements at the range, and lowering fees. Tennessee now offers a gun carry permit course that can be completed entirely online. Other states, such as Kansas, have eliminated licensure altogether. When Texas lowered training standards for its concealed handgun license in 2013 to just 4 hours of classroom instruction, lawmakers said that there simply wasn’t enough material to justify the 10 hours previously required. Typical curriculum covers operation of a firearm and some guidance about where and when it might be appropriate to use it. Some gun violence prevention advocates would like to see the curriculum expanded to include strategies in de-escalation, risk avoidance, safe storage and first aid. Everytown for Gun Safety goes a step further, suggesting that such training should be mandatory for everyone wishing to buy a gun, not just those seeking a permit to carry it in public.

Why Republicans aren't likely to budge on gun control

  Why Republicans aren't likely to budge on gun control The political script following the recent mass shootings in Boulder, Colorado, and Atlanta feels all too familiar. Democrats, led by President Joe Biden, want Congress to pass gun control legislation, most notably universal background checks, while Republicans are balking. © Brian Blanco/Getty Images North America/Getty Images Two Remington R1 Enhanced model 1911 pistols sit in a case available for sale at Atlantic Outdoors gun shop on March 26, 2018, in Stokesdale, North Carolina.

So far, the NRA has consistently supported state legislation to reduce or eliminate training requirements for carry permits. That position, though, puts the gun lobby in the awkward position of working against the interests of firearms instructors, whose livelihoods depend on the money they make teaching state-mandated classes. There might be a window for compromise.

3. Encourage gun owners to support each other through hardships

Decades of research in the social sciences has linked access to guns with higher risk of completed suicide. People who attempt suicide with a gun die nine times out of 10, whereas other common means (such as cutting and overdose) are much more survivable. That’s why the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (New York SAFE Act) directed mental health professionals to report suicidal patients to a state agency, which could subsequently seize any guns they might own, and add their name to a “no buy” database for five years. Even in New York, though, this provision is controversial and has faced repeated court challenges. We shouldn’t expect to see similar legislation proliferating across the country anytime soon.

Instead, suicide prevention activists have been trying to cultivate a culture of community responsibility among gun owners, asking them to reach out to friends in crisis with an offer to store their guns after a divorce, job loss, death in the family or other trauma. The idea of letting your neighbor or your hunting buddy lock your gun up in his safe for a while might be more palatable than handing it over to the sheriff. Suicide prevention groups have partnered with gun shops and shooting ranges, first in New Hampshire and now in 11 other states, to spread the idea through posters and pamphlets.

Three ways gun owners and gun control advocates can find common ground

  Three ways gun owners and gun control advocates can find common ground Gun owners are just as horrified as anyone else when someone commits a mass shooting. But comments like Beto O'Rourke's infamous "coming for your guns" remark or the concept of "never letting a good crisis go to waste" push us toward absolutist positions. But it doesn't have to be that way.Here are three areas where gun owners like myself would be amenable to new gun legislation.First, close the gun show loophole.

4. Enforce court-ordered surrender of firearms

When someone has been convicted of a felony, is subject to a qualifying restraining order, or has been adjudicated mentally unfit by a court, their name is added to a list of prohibited buyers in the National Instant Background Check System. When the system works as intended, they’ll fail any subsequent background check and won’t be able to buy a gun (at least not from a federally licensed dealer).

But what about guns they already own?

Protocols vary widely by jurisdiction—some municipalities issue deadlines for individuals to surrender their guns, with prescribed penalties if the deadlines are missed. Other locales don’t even inform the individual that they are supposed to surrender their guns. To remedy such inconsistent enforcement, the Center for American Progress has proposed that the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives form taskforces to create protocols for the seizure of firearms from prohibited individuals, and direct local law enforcement agencies to follow those protocols.

Considering that gun rights advocates have long insisted that better enforcement—rather than new gun control laws—is their preferred remedy for gun violence, this idea could find some bipartisan support.

5. Challenge industry immunities

Manufacturers and retailers of everything from baby food to cigarettes have changed irresponsible business practices either as the consequence of a lawsuit or to avoid the prospect of one. The gun industry, though, has unique immunity from civil suits, thanks to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, signed into law by George W. Bush in 2005. The PLCAA and similar state laws shield gunmakers and sellers from liability for the harm inflicted with their products.

More than 100 lawmakers call on Biden to regulate weapon used in Colorado shooting

  More than 100 lawmakers call on Biden to regulate weapon used in Colorado shooting Lawmakers ask President Joe Biden to take executive action and regulate the Ruger AR-556, the pistol used in a recent shooting in Boulder, Colorado.The weapon was used in the recent shooting in a Boulder, Colorado, grocery store that killed 10 people.

One of the most outrageous examples of industry immunity is the case of Sandy and Lonnie Phillips, who attempted to sue the online ammunition retailer who supplied the gunman who killed their daughter and 11 other moviegoers at an Aurora, Colorado theater in 2012. Their lawsuit was dismissed on the first motion, and they were ordered to cover the defendant’s legal fees, to the tune of $200,000.

The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence has been collecting signatures for a petition to repeal PLCAA, and the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence has said that repeal of industry immunity is a legislative goal. Still, any solution that depends on Congressional action remains a longshot—that’s why activists are continuing to test the limits of industry immunity in the courts.

Parents of one of the children killed in the Sandy Hook massacre won a recent victory in their ongoing suit against Remington Arms, the owner of subsidiary Bushmaster, the manufacturer of the AR-15 style rifle used in that attack. The basis of the lawsuit wasn’t the gun itself, but the manner in which it was marketed—with the slogan “Forces of opposition, bow down. You are single-handedly outnumbered.” (Evoking the idea, according to the plaintiffs, that the weapon should be used for “assaultive” purposes.) The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that that suit can proceed, despite Remington’s argument for immunity under PLCAA.

6. Mandate liability insurance

For years, gun violence prevention advocates have argued that guns should be regulated more like cars—with an obligation incumbent on every operator to maintain registration, a license and, crucially, liability insurance. Back in 2017, I reported on a new insurance product the NRA was offering to its members, called Carry Guard. The policies came with a stiff metal wallet card, with a phone number to call in the event that the bearer had shot someone—not to summon an ambulance, but an attorney. This wasn’t the type of insurance the GVP community had envisioned. The coverage wasn’t meant to pay medical costs for gunshot victims—it was intended to pay legal fees to defend the shooter from civil or criminal charges. Critics called it “murder insurance” and worried that, rather than incentivizing caution, Carry Guard would embolden people to shoot first and get a lawyer to ask questions later. The program ran afoul of New York State’s insurance regulators, one of a series of missteps that led the NRA to file for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protections earlier this year.

But just because the NRA’s experiment in liability insurance was a colossal disaster doesn’t mean the idea couldn’t have merit if designed differently. Indeed, the prominent ethicist Hugh LaFollette argues in his recent book In Defense of Gun Control (Oxford University Press, 2018) that liability insurance can be both a practical and morally just tool to mitigate the harms of gun violence. LaFollette devotes the last 11 pages of the book to laying out the argument for liability insurance—more space than he spends making his closing case for gun-free zones, an assault weapons ban or any other single policy initiative.

When asked about policies to combat gun violence beyond an assault weapons ban and background checks, gun violence prevention advocates often refer to the Denver Accord, a plan that came out of a 2019 conference hosted by gun violence research aggregator GVPedia. The accord includes some of the policy initiatives outlined here, and many more that could be pursued at every level of government—from the White House to city councils. Po Kim Murray, chairwoman of Newtown Action Alliance, told me she hopes the Biden administration will embrace the Denver Accord. Merely by doing so, Biden could signal state and local activists that this is the roadmap they should follow.

“We know the policy solutions that are required to end this gun violence crisis. We have the Denver Accord,” Murray said. “We’re ready for him to lead and be a warrior and a champion for the movement.”

Gun control advocates applaud Biden funding plan but say more must be done .
Gun control advocates are pushing President Biden to take more aggressive action on gun violence in the wake of three deadly mass shootings in as many weeks.Democrats and outside groups are praising the $5 billion for community violence prevention programs tucked into the president's massive infrastructure package, which was unveiled Wednesday and is likely to get the next big legislative push on Capitol Hill.But they say more must beDemocrats and outside groups are praising the $5 billion for community violence prevention programs tucked into the president's massive infrastructure package, which was unveiled Wednesday and is likely to get the next big legislative push on Capitol Hill.

usr: 2
This is interesting!