•   
  •   
  •   

US DHS gathering intelligence on extremists, security threats from public social media

12:50  10 may  2021
12:50  10 may  2021 Source:   nbcnews.com

U.S. troops are leaving Afghanistan, but Al Qaeda remains

  U.S. troops are leaving Afghanistan, but Al Qaeda remains As U.S. troops leave Afghanistan, efforts against a diminished Al Qaeda are in flux. Officials say the terrorist group could threaten the U.S. again.It was a tableau often seen in years past, but on this recent afternoon there was a crucial difference: The Afghans were alone, without the American forces that have backed them in a 20-year war.

WASHINGTON — The Department of Homeland Security has begun implementing a strategy to gather and analyze intelligence about security threats from public social media posts, DHS officials said.

a group of people standing in front of a building © Provided by NBC News

The goal is to build a warning system to detect the sort of posts that appeared to predict an attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 but were missed or ignored by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, the officials said.

The focus is not on the identity of the posters but rather on gleaning insights about potential security threats based on emerging narratives and grievances. So far, DHS is using human beings, not computer algorithms, to make sense of the data, the officials said.

Domestic security is in disarray: We need a manager, now more than ever

  Domestic security is in disarray: We need a manager, now more than ever An unorganized, ad hoc approach to domestic security is not good. Much of this can be improved with a simple fix: Create a Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Domestic Coordination to bring order to this government effort, which a former senior official described as "like grade school soccer...everybody running to the ball ... no game plan ... no coach." This is no spymaster; instead, the job would simply be as a manager who can perform the essential bureaucratic tasks needed to bring order to this well-intentioned but disordered effort.

"We're not looking at who are the individual posters," said a senior official involved in the effort. "We are looking at what narratives are resonating and spreading across platforms. From there you may be able to determine what are the potential targets you need to protect."

The officials didn't describe what criteria or methods the analysts would use to parse the data. They said DHS officials have been consulting with social media companies, private companies and nonprofit groups that analyze open-source social media data.

"Domestic violent extremism poses the most lethal, persistent terrorism-related threat to our homeland today," said Sarah Peck, a DHS spokeswoman, adding that all DHS efforts against the threat "are carried out in close coordination with our privacy, civil rights and civil liberties experts and consistent with the law."

Top counterintelligence official highlights foreign espionage threats

  Top counterintelligence official highlights foreign espionage threats Orlando and "Intelligence Matters" host Michael Morell discuss espionage threats against the U.S. that have evolved in range and sophistication. © Credit: CBSNews cbsnews-intelligence-matters-podcast-horizontal-620x350.jpg Highlights Adversaries targeting private sector: "So, if you look back 20 years ago, what we were most concerned about was intelligence services targeting the U.S. government for classified information or targeting DOD technologies.

Law enforcement officers and intelligence analysts are legally entitled to examine — without warrants — what people say openly on Twitter, Facebook and other public social media forums, just as they can take in information from reading newspapers. But civil liberties groups generally oppose government monitoring of social media, arguing that it doesn't produce much intelligence and risks chilling free speech.

a little girl standing in front of a window: Image: A Capitol police officer at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 (Tasos Katopodis / Getty Images file) © Tasos Katopodis Image: A Capitol police officer at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 (Tasos Katopodis / Getty Images file)

"Internal government reviews have repeatedly raised concerns about the usefulness of wide-ranging collection of social media information, but agencies keep barreling forward, wrongly assuming that its benefits must outweigh its costs," said Hugh Handeyside, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union in Washington.

Biden officials testify that white supremacists are greatest domestic security threat

  Biden officials testify that white supremacists are greatest domestic security threat The Biden administration's top law enforcement officials on Wednesday pledged to dedicate their resources to combat domestic violent extremists amid questions over whether the agencies are equipped to monitor such threats in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.Attorney General Merrick Garland and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas appeared before the Senate Appropriations Committee for a hearing on domestic extremism as Congress ramped up its scrutiny this week of the circumstances around the attack on the Capitol.

"People say inflammatory stuff on social media, but as an empirical matter, that speech isn't a valid or reliable predictor of violent conduct," he said.

Handeyside pointed out that the White House budget office last July blocked a DHS proposal to collect social media information about visa applicants, saying the agency "has not adequately demonstrated the practical utility of collecting this information."

In terms of free speech, he said, "when people know that the government is watching, they self-censor."

"That leads to the suppression of ideas and discourse that might be deemed controversial," he said.

DHS officials say that the counterterrorism case for analyzing social media is strong and that they believe social media can be a useful predictor of threats.

Other experts agree. Concerns about government intrusion on free speech are legitimate, said Oren Segal, vice president of the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League, but the government can hardly ignore the main vector of extremist communication in the U.S.

"As a way to gauge potential threats, potential narratives that animate people to action, the online space is where that's at," he said. "This is why the insurrection was predictable from our point of view, because the planning and the organizing was happening in plain site. ... This is not an easy issue, but one thing we can all agree on is that in order to get ahead of the next threat, you need to go into the spaces in which the extremists are present."

Department of Homeland Security is now watching social media for terrorist narratives

  Department of Homeland Security is now watching social media for terrorist narratives The Department of Homeland Security will watch social media posts to track narratives that could lead to unrest, violence and hate crimesThat’s the narrative Robert Bowers alluded to on social media before killing 11 people at a synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018. Patrick Crusius, who killed 22 people at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, less than a year later, was inspired by the racist trope. So was John Earnest, who killed one person and injured three others in a shooting in Poway, California.

Many social media posts are made anonymously, and in some cases warrants signed by judges would be required for the government to obtain records revealing the identities of the posters. DHS officials said that would be the responsibility of the FBI in a criminal investigation.

DHS' goal is to exploit social media for tips, leads and trends, officials say.

For example, the official involved in the social media effort said, in the weeks after the Jan. 6 riot, DHS and other agencies observed a large volume of social media chatter promising more violence at the Capitol and around the inauguration of President Joe Biden. That led authorities to expand and extend a massive security presence, including National Guard troops and fencing, that appears to have deterred would-be violent protesters.

In testimony late last month to the House Homeland Security subcommittee on counterterrorism, John Cohen, the assistant secretary of homeland security for counterterrorism, referred to the social media push.

He said DHS planned "increased analytic focus to more comprehensively assess how violent extremist actors and other perpetrators of targeted violence exploit and leverage social media and other online platforms and how those online activities are linked to real-world violence."

Lifted COVID-19 restrictions provide opportunities for domestic extremists, DHS warns

  Lifted COVID-19 restrictions provide opportunities for domestic extremists, DHS warns The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) warned Friday that the recent easing of some coronavirus restrictions could provide new opportunities for domestic extremists. "Violent extremists may seek to exploit the easing of COVID-19-related restrictions across the United States to conduct attacks against a broader range of targets after previous public capacity limits reduced opportunities for lethal attacks," the department warned in its"Violent extremists may seek to exploit the easing of COVID-19-related restrictions across the United States to conduct attacks against a broader range of targets after previous public capacity limits reduced opportunities for lethal attacks," the department warned in its lat

The goal, he said, is to "identify emerging narratives as early as possible and assess whether those narratives are likely to influence acts of violence and how fast they're spreading across multiple platforms."

The biggest terrorism threat comes not from abroad but from individuals and small groups in the U.S., fueled by racist and extremist conspiracy theories online, who believe violence is a valid way "to express their dissatisfaction with our nation or with their personal situation," Cohen said.

Cohen and John Godfrey, the State Department's acting coordinator for counterterrorism, testified that U.S. adversaries, including Russia and Iran, have been seeking to foment American extremism on social media.

For example, Cohen said, after former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murder in the death of George Floyd, DHS analysts saw similar posts alleging unfairness in the trial on forums associated with Russia, Iran and domestic extremists.

FBI officials have also acknowledged a foreign role in social media disinformation, but they have said the details are classified. The FBI has faced scrutiny about its social media policies after what some lawmakers have said was the bureau's intelligence failure in not anticipating the attack on the Capitol. Former FBI agents who worked domestic terrorism said they believe the FBI has been too reluctant to analyze public posts related to domestic extremism because it fears being seen as spying on Americans who are exercising their free speech rights.

Exclusive: Inside the Military's Secret Undercover Army

  Exclusive: Inside the Military's Secret Undercover Army Thousands of soldiers, civilians and contractors operate under false names, on the ground and in cyberspace. A Newsweek investigation of the ever-growing and unregulated world of "signature reduction."The unprecedented shift has placed an ever greater number of soldiers, civilians, and contractors working under false identities, partly as a natural result in the growth of secret special forces but also as an intentional response to the challenges of traveling and operating in an increasingly transparent world.

As NBC News has reported, hundreds of public posts called for violence to stop the congressional counting of the electoral votes in Biden's victory, some of which included specific plans to assault the Capitol and arrest lawmakers. Yet FBI officials have said they had no intelligence that the Capitol was a target.

Officials at DHS — which also didn't foresee the Capitol attack — say they would pay more attention to those sorts of posts, such as one on a site called TheDonald.win by a user called CommunismSucks.

"Bring handcuffs and zipties to DC," the poster wrote. "No more tolerating 'elected' officials who hate our country. January 6th is the chance to restore this country. Barging into the Capitol through multiple entryways is the surest way to have our bases covered and apprehend these traitors."

It's not known whether that person traveled to the Capitol, but many people who did left similar digital trails, law enforcement officials say.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the Intelligence Committee, asked FBI Director Christopher Wray about the issue at last month's hearing on top national security threats.

"It appears that probably some of the best intelligence prior to Jan. 6 was open source," Schiff said. "It was discussion on social media [about] plans to attack the Capitol. This raises an important but very difficult question for the bureau. ... What is the bureau's policy in terms of your ability to review social media when it's appropriate to do it, when it's not appropriate to do it? Do you have a clear policy on that, and are there legal constraints, as well, that preclude you from getting the intelligence that you need?"

Wray said that without tips or some other impetus, the FBI didn't consider itself free to hunt for threats of violence or domestic terrorism plots on social media, even if the posts are public.

"We do not, as the FBI, simply patrol social media looking for problems," he said.

In a sense, DHS will now do just that, officials said — patrol public social media looking for intelligence pointing to threats.

DHS sparked outrage over its open-source intelligence collection last year when it emerged that analysts had been compiling dossiers about tweets by certain journalists covering border issues. The secretary of homeland security ordered analysts to stop collecting information about journalists, and the flap led to a pullback in all types of collection of public information, current and former DHS officials have said.

Officials say they are taking a careful approach.

"Our job is not to police thought and speech — our job is to prevent acts of violence," Cohen told lawmakers.

However, he said later, "We have to understand the close proximity between constitutionally protected speech ... and the threat of violence posed by individuals who use that speech or leverage that speech as a way to incite violence."

As war rages on, Democrats decry US arms sales to Israel .
SALE SENDS WRONG MESSAGE: Democrats in Congress say they were blindsided by the Biden administration’s approval earlier this month of the sale of $735 million in satellite-guided bombs to Israel, arguing the timing couldn’t be worse as Israel and Hamas militants in Gaza trade fire and the casualty count mounts. © Provided by Washington Examiner DOD header 2020 At least 212 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli airstrikes since May 10, including 61 children and 36 women, according to the Associated Press. On the Israeli side, 10 people, including a 5-year-old boy, have been killed in the Hamas rocket attacks.

usr: 1
This is interesting!