US California settles climate lawsuit with fossil fuel giant SoCalGas
One policy that could challenge a century of fossil fuel dominance
A clean electricity standard could be “the biggest change in our energy policy since the lights went on.”This policy could be “the biggest change in our energy policy since the lights went on,” Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith told Vox in a July interview. She called it the “centerpiece” of Democratic climate policy under President Joe Biden.
A fight between the nation's largest gas utility and California's influential climate change regulators has reached a quiet conclusion — but it won't be the last such battle as the Golden State hurries to eliminate heat-trapping fossil fuels.
Southern California Gas Co. and the California Energy Commission agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by the Los Angeles-based utility company. SoCalGas had claimed state officials wererequiring them to consider the benefits of natural gas — one of the fossil fuels responsible for the worsening fires, floods and heat waves of the climate crisis.
Has Congress forgotten the urgent importance of the climate crisis?
The climate emergency requires proportional solutions. Congress must rise to the occasion.For decades, I have dedicated myself to studying the deterioration of our Earth's systems. I've co-authored various climate emergency reports with some of the world's leading climate scientists to compile findings and offer recommendations that are comprehensive and effective. For decades, scientists have been waving the warning flag - urging governments and elected officials to do something about the greatest challenge humankind has ever faced. And for decades, those governments and elected officials have taken incremental steps or ignored the problem altogether.
The company agreed to drop the suit even though the agency didn't take the steps it demanded and has no plans to do so, Energy Commission spokesperson Lindsay Buckley said. She didn't provide details of the settlement, which was finalized Aug. 26.
"Transitioning away from an economy that is based on fossil fuels is a necessary challenge and requires constructive dialogue and creative thinking that happens when all parties are at the table working cooperatively," David Hochschild, who was appointed by Gov. Gavin Newsom to chair the Energy Commission, said in a written statement.
SoCalGas wouldn't say specifically why it agreed to drop the lawsuit, filed last year in Orange County Superior Court. Asked about the settlement, company spokesperson Christine Detz said the Energy Commission "is holding workshops and studying scenarios to help the state reach its greenhouse gas emissions goals, including the role that clean fuels like hydrogen and renewable natural gas will play."
Daily on Energy: House Democrats take on natural gas
Subscribe today to the Washington Examiner magazine and get Washington Briefing: politics and policy stories that will keep you up to date with what's going on in Washington. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $1.00 an issue! © Provided by Washington Examiner DOE Default Image - July 2021 HOUSE DEMOCRATS VS. NATURAL GAS: House Democrats have decided to keep natural gas out of the “Clean Electricity Payment Program,” the centerpiece climate policy of their reconciliation package, delivering a big win for environmental activists.
"We appreciate the broad and inclusive process the [commission] is taking and look forward to working together toward our shared goals," Detz said in an email.
As California looks beyond coal — whichfrom its power supply — it's seeking out strategies for replacing natural gas, which is cleaner than coal and oil but still fuels climate change and releases lung-damaging air pollution.
SoCalGas has emerged as a powerful opponent of that push.
A coalition backed by the gas company and other business groupsto pass resolutions calling for "balanced" energy policies — an attempt to slow the banning or discouraging gas hookups in new construction. Clean-energy advocates say replacing gas heaters and stoves with electric appliances will not only reduce planet-warming emissions but also limit indoor gas leaks that research shows can .
California's battle with climate change is at stake in Tuesday's recall election
Many of the Republican candidates on the ballot to replace Newsom want to roll back the state's plans to address climate change and transition to clean energy. Conservative radio host Larry Elder, a supporter of former President Donald Trump who has consistently spread climate misinformation, has emerged as the clear front-runner. © Provided by CNBC Gavin Newsom, governor of California, speaks during a 'Vote No' recall campaign event in San Francisco, California, U.S., on Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2021. California voters will decide whether to remove Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in a Sept. 14 recall election.
The gas company also questioned the rationale behind the Energy Commission's recent decision to. The commission stopped short of banning gas in new construction, but approved rules that will require developers to include wiring that allows for later installation of electric heat pumps and cooktops. In to the state agency, SoCalGas suggested the regulations could make housing more expensive and lead to higher energy bills.
The company says its pipelines are crucial for confronting the climate crisis, arguing that slashing emissions from power plants, vehicles and homes will be far easier and cheaper if fuels such as hydrogen and renewable gas are subbed in for fossil gas. Many climate experts and advocates are skeptical, arguing that an electric grid powered by solar panels, wind turbines and batteries is the best solution for cleaning up pollution across most parts of the economy.
SoCalGas serves 21.8 million customers from the San Joaquin Valley to the U.S.-Mexico border and brought in $4.7 billion in operating revenue last year. Its corporate sibling, San Diego Gas & Electric, also has an extensive pipeline network.
California recall election: Will the state keep or remove Gov. Gavin Newsom? Results could take time.
Tuesday is decision day in California and voters in the Golden State will decide whether they will keep Gov. Gavin Newsom or remove him from office.It's been a winding path to get here, but polls show the Democrat is likely to keep his job leading a state that is known nationally as a liberal trendsetter.
Both utilities are owned by Sempra Energy of San Diego, which isin export terminals to take natural gas produced in the United States and send it overseas. Sempra a proposal in the state Legislature, , that would require California to slash its planet-warming carbon dioxide emissions 90% below 1990 levels by 2045 — a target roughly in line with what scientists say is to avoid the most devastating consequences of a rapidly heating planet.
Sempra "is just very much wedded to natural gas being part of reducing emissions,” said Daniel Stewart, a program manager at As You Sow, a nonprofit that works with corporate shareholders to advocate for stronger climate action.
Joining SoCalGas in its lawsuit against the Energy Commission was Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a Newport Beach company that owns natural gas fueling stations. The Times and nonprofit news outlet Floodlightthat a campaign firm being paid by Clean Energy Fuels had hired unsuspecting local residents near the ports of L.A. and Long Beach to argue for natural gas-fueled trucks, rather than zero-emission electric trucks, as the best solution for cleaning up dirty air at the ports.
Clean Energy Fuels declined to comment on the lawsuit settlement. A company executive previously told The Times that he didn't know anything about the campaign firm paying local residents during the debate at the ports in 2017.
Norway's 'Climate Election' Showed Voters Want Change. But Are They Ready to Give Up Oil?
While Norway itself relies on renewable sources for energy production, it is the third largest exporter of natural gases in the world , behind Russia and Qatar. The Ipsos survey describes Norwegians’ simultaneous support for the fossil fuel and renewable energy industries as “cognitive dissonance.”In Norway’s case, it could be the smaller, more radical parties that may influence the new government’s climate strategy. The communist Red party with eight seats, up from one, and the Greens with three, could offer major support to the Labor party in an extended coalition government.
“We support California’s environmental goals and efforts to reduce carbon emissions from the energy and transportation systems. However, achieving those goals does not require minimizing the role of natural gas," Clean Energy Fuels spokesperson Raleigh Gerber said in a written statement last year, when the lawsuit against the Energy Commission was filed.
Also joining the lawsuit were three chapters of the Utility Workers Union of America, collectively representing nearly 5,000 SoCalGas employees, many of whom could lose their jobs if the state successfully phases out gas pipelines.
An attorney representing the three chapters — UWUA Locals 132, 483 and 522 — didn't respond to an email asking about the settlement. But in a written statement when the lawsuit was filed, the presidents of the three locals argued that state officials had "embarked on a self-guided excursion into fuels policy that, contrary to law, would minimize the use of natural gas."
"We are advocates for making the best use of all available fuels, consistent with the goal of dramatically reducing the carbon footprint of our advanced economy," they said at the time. "Substituting electricity for natural gas in some applications may make sense, but an unexamined assumption that this is always the case and should always guide policy defies common sense."
The law firm representing SoCalGas in the suit was Sullivan & Cromwell, whichin a climate change "scorecard" released last month by Law Students for Climate Accountability. The report assigned letter grades to the country's 100 most prestigious law firms based on their clients, with more work on behalf of fossil fuel companies leading to a worse score and any work on behalf of renewable energy companies potentially lessening the harshness of the decree.
House Oversight launches investigation into climate crisis disinformation by fossil fuel industry
The announcement comes after reports the fossil fuel industry has participated in campaigns aimed at creating confusion about the cause of the climate crisis.The announcement comes after reports the fossil fuel industry has participated in campaigns aimed at creating confusion about the cause of the climate crisis, or sowing skepticism in the science. An undercover video released this summer appeared to show an ExxonMobil lobbyist admitting the company fought climate policy and the science behind it.
Sullivan & Cromwell representatives didn't respond to an email seeking comment on the F grade.
In a related legal fight, a federal judge recentlybrought by the California Restaurant Assn. against the city of Berkeley, which in 2019 approved the nation's first ban on gas hookups in most new buildings. The restaurant group . The case is seen as an early test of whether dozens of similar policies in other cities will survive legal scrutiny.
“The loss of flame cooking in restaurant settings would dramatically impact restaurant kitchens, where chefs rely on gas stoves to grill vegetables, sear meats and create meals,” Jot Condie, president of the restaurant association, said in a written statement.
Climate activists have long suspected the gas industry of funding the lawsuit. In a news release sent on behalf of Earthjustice and the Sierra Club this summer, public affairs firm Sunstone Strategies pointed to a newly filedshowing SoCalGas paid nearly $1.8 million last year to Reichman Jorgensen, the law firm representing the restaurant association. SoCalGas also increased its contributions to the nonprofit associated with the restaurant association to $146,000 in 2020 from $24,000 in 2019.
Detz, the gas company spokesperson, said the payments to Reichman Jorgensen are "unrelated" to the firm's work on the gas ban lawsuit. The firm "provides legal support to our General Counsel’s office, among other legal activities," Detz said in an email.
As for SoCalGas’ donations to the associated nonprofit, restaurant association spokesperson Sharokina Shams said in an email that utility companies Pacific Gas & Electric and SDG&E have also donated, with the money funding “hardship grants to small restaurants and to restaurant workers.” SoCalGas spokesperson Chris Gilbride pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact.
"We’re proud of theto over the last year and to get ," Gilbride said in a written statement earlier this year.
Sarah Jorgensen, a founding partner at Reichman Jorgensen, said it would be unethical to discuss fee arrangements with clients.
This story originally appeared in.
California wildfires threaten famous giant sequoia trees .
THREE RIVERS, Calif. (AP) — Firefighters wrapped the base of the world's largest tree in a fire-resistant blanket as they tried to save a famous grove of gigantic old-growth sequoias from wildfires burning Thursday in California’s rugged Sierra Nevada. The colossal General Sherman Tree in Sequoia National Park’s Giant Forest, some other sequoias, the Giant Forest Museum and other buildings were wrapped as protection against the possibility of intense flames, fire spokeswoman Rebecca Paterson said.