•   
  •   
  •   

US Supreme Court hears appeal of Maine parents seeking to have state pay for religious schools

08:00  08 december  2021
08:00  08 december  2021 Source:   cnn.com

Religious abortion rights supporters fight for access

  Religious abortion rights supporters fight for access On the day the Supreme Court hears arguments in a Mississippi abortion ban case, Sheila Katz plans to be at a nearby church. It is where the Jewish organization she leads is helping to host a morning interfaith service in support of abortion rights. That gathering, and a planned rally outside the court, are among the ways the National Council of Jewish Women and like-minded faith groups are challenging the erosion of abortion access in the U.S. “We’re going to start together as diverse groups of faith, to pray and learn and sing together,” Katz said. “That feels like the right way to send the message that we are doing this work because of our faith and not in spite of it.

The Supreme Court will return to the issue of religious liberty Wednesday and consider a Maine school tuition assistance program that parents say violates their religious rights under the First Amendment.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 21: An exterior view of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 21, 2012 in Washington, DC. © Alex Wong/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 21: An exterior view of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 21, 2012 in Washington, DC.

The case could mark the court's latest step to expand religious freedom, a trend bolstered by the addition of three of former President Donald Trump's nominees and favored by Justice Samuel Alito, who claimed in a 2020 speech that "in certain quarters" religious liberty is "fast becoming a disfavored right."

States Must Stop Discriminating Against Religious Schools | Opinion

  States Must Stop Discriminating Against Religious Schools | Opinion Pluralism and diversity, not sameness or monopoly, make for a successful schooling enterprise. And religious schools play a vital role in preparing the citizens of tomorrow.Unfortunately, the state of Maine's school-funding policies ignore these truths. What's more, they violate the First Amendment and recent Supreme Court rulings prohibiting discrimination against religion.

In Wednesday's case, lawyers for two sets of parents will argue that Maine's program infringes upon their rights because it bars them from using the funds to send their children to the religious school of their choosing.

To make their case, they point to past precedent such as a dispute from 2017 where the court determined that a state could not restrict funds for resurfacing playgrounds from a church-owned preschool based solely on its religious identity. In June 2020, the court held that a state could not exclude families and schools from participating in a student aid program because of a school's religious status. Last term, the justices also ruled in favor of houses of worship in a series of emergency applications challenging Covid-19 restrictions.

3 lawyers readying arguments in high court abortion case

  3 lawyers readying arguments in high court abortion case WASHINGTON (AP) — Leading up to Wednesday's major abortion case at the Supreme Court, the justices have heard from thousands of people and organizations urging the court to either save or scrap two historic abortion decisions. But on Wednesday they'll hear from just three lawyers: one representing the state of Mississippi, another representing Mississippi's only abortion clinic and the last representing the Biden administration. For each, it’s a chance to be part of what is likely to be a historic case. The three are scheduled to appear before the justices for just over an hour's worth of arguments in Dobbs v.

In Maine, parents living in some rural areas without a school district receive vouchers so that they can send their kids to public or private schools in other areas The aim of the program, the state says, is to give students an education that is roughly equivalent to what they would have had if there had been a public school in their area.

To participate in the program, a private school must meet the requirements of Maine's compulsory education law. The school district must pay tuition, up to a statutory limit, "at the public school or the approved private school of the parent's choice" and the school must be "nonsectarian."

A school's affiliation with a religious institution does not, on its own, render a school ineligible. Instead, the state looks at the sectarian nature of the instruction and whether it "promotes the faith or belief system with which it is associated."

Abortion: Challenge to Mississippi law could provide answer to Roe v. Wade's fate

  Abortion: Challenge to Mississippi law could provide answer to Roe v. Wade's fate At stake in the case is a Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy as well as the Supreme Court's commitment to Roe v. Wade.In the most closely watched dispute the high court has tackled in years, the justices will consider not only whether to uphold the Mississippi law but whether to overturn its 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade that established a constitutional right to abortion.

Maine argues that the nonsectarian provision is necessary to ensure that public money is not funding religious education. While some religiously affiliated schools are allowed, the state draws the line if the educational material is presented through the lens of faith.

Religious organizations "that are willing to provide education comparable to a public education" are eligible to receive the public funds, Christopher Taub, Maine's chief deputy attorney general, wrote in court papers, but the state declines to fund schools that offer "an education designed to proselytize and inculcate children with a particular faith."

The Biden administration supports Maine in the dispute.

Lawyers for the parents say they are being unlawfully excluded because their children attend or wish to attend a sectarian school.

David and Amy Carson send their children to Bangor Christian, a school they say they selected because of its academic rigor and the fact it aligns with their religious beliefs. They seek to use the state funds to help pay the tuition. According to the court record, the school has a mission to instill a "Biblical world view" and it will not hire teachers who are LGBTQ.

Man Serving 48 Years for Killing Woman Wants Conviction Tossed After Pandemic Delays Trial

  Man Serving 48 Years for Killing Woman Wants Conviction Tossed After Pandemic Delays Trial Carine Reeves claims that because his trial didn't take place within 120 days after he returned to Maine from New York, his guilty verdict should be thrown out.Carine Reeves, 41, was convicted in October of 2020 of murder in the shooting death of 55-year-old Sally Shaw in 2017.

Troy and Angela Nelson seek to send their child to Temple Academy, a religiously affiliated school, but would need the tuition assistance to do so. The school, located in Waterville, Maine, expects its teachers, according to court papers, "to integrate Biblical principles with their teaching in every subject."

"Maine's sectarian exclusion discriminates against families who are eligible for the tuition assistance program and believe that a religious education is the best option for their child," Michael E. Bindas, a lawyer for the Institute of Justice who is representing the parents, said in legal briefs.

In the past, courts have drawn a distinction at times between a religious organization's "status" or identity and how the schools will actually "use" the funds. A federal appeals court used that reasoning to uphold Maine's program.

The 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals said that Maine's program does not "bar schools from receiving funding simply based on their religious identity," but, instead, bars the funds based on the "religious use" that the school would make of the funds.

Eric Rassbach, vice president at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty who filed a brief in support of the parents, said the so called "status/use" distinction is meaningless in the context of religious schools.

"The court should reject the idea that to participate in a public benefits program, religious schools have to stop exercising their religion," Rassbach told CNN.

While the court has in recent years trended to side with plaintiffs making religious liberty arguments, Alito has said the justices aren't moving quickly enough.

In June, Alito wrote a furious opinion joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch when he said that the court had not gone far enough in ruling in favor of a Catholic foster care agency that refused to work with same-sex couples as potential parents because the agency believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman.

Alito complained that his colleagues -- while ruling unanimously in favor of the agency -- had "emitted a wisp of a decision that leaves religious liberty in a confused and vulnerable state."

Wednesday will be another chance to see what the justices are thinking.

Gorsuch’s Crusade Against Vaccine Mandates Could Topple A Pillar of Public Health .
More Americans could die as a result of the justice's idea that religious liberty is paramount. It also means that more people may die because powerful jurists are infecting the public discourse with fact-free, medically discredited analysis pits people of faith and their religious liberties against the health of everyone else.

usr: 0
This is interesting!