•   
  •   
  •   

World'They want to hit where it hurts': Why elements in Iran would blow up foreign tankers

13:20  20 june  2019
13:20  20 june  2019 Source:   cnbc.com

Iran Shoots Down a U.S. Drone, Escalating Tensions

Iran Shoots Down a U.S. Drone, Escalating Tensions Iran shot down a United States surveillance drone early Thursday, both nations said, but they differed on the crucial issue of whether the aircraft had violated Iranian airspace, in the latest escalation in tensions that have raised fears of war between the two countries. Iranian officials said that the drone was over Iran, which the American military denied — an important distinction in determining who was at fault — and each side accused the other of being the aggressor. Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter Both said the downing occurred at 4:05 a.m. Iranian time on Thursday, or 7:35 p.m. on Wednesday in Washington.

' They want to hit where it hurts ': Here's why Iran could want to attack foreign tankers . The U.S. and the Saudis say Iran is behind the suspected tanker attacks, while the U.K. says they 're "almost So why would elements within Iran risk blowing up foreign merchant tankers in their own backyard?

" Iran has probably arrived at the conclusion that it has less to lose from acting this way than from doing nothing," Aniseh Tabrizi, a research fellow and Iran expert at London's Royal United Services Institute, told CNBC via phone Tuesday. "There is a gamble behind it that wasn't there before, which is: 'If other

'They want to hit where it hurts': Why elements in Iran would blow up foreign tankers© Provided by CNBC LLC Undated handout archive photo by the Norwegian shipowner Frontline of the crude oil tanker Front Altair, released June 13, 2019.

Iran's economy is crumbling. It's in a region bristling with U.S. military hardware, and it's staring down an American administration that has made clear all options are on the table if tensions between the two countries erupt into something bigger.

So why on earth would elements within the country risk blowing up foreign merchant tankers in their own backyard?

Trump Approves Strikes on Iran, but Then Abruptly Pulls Back

Trump Approves Strikes on Iran, but Then Abruptly Pulls Back President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); As late as 7 p.m.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani says it ’ll be “very easy” for Joe Biden to repair relations between the Islamic Republic and the U.S. “The knotty problem can be untied with will and one decision,” he said in televised remarks on Wednesday. But a look at Iran ’s economy suggests much of the wreckage left

Kadkhodaei said Iran made the right decision in the face of an 'illegitimate economic war and seizure of oil tankers .' An image released by the Iran Students In any case, it is not clear who Whitehall should speak to in Iran in order to negotiate a way out of this predicament. The Iranian foreign minister

The answer ⁠— if, as the U.S. government says, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was behind the suspected tanker attacks of last week ⁠— requires understanding Iran's motivations, its history and the warfighting tactics in which its combat units have developed a sharpened expertise.

It's crucial to note that the culprit behind the June 13 events ⁠— explosions that rendered two commercial tankers, the Japanese Kokuka Courageous and the Norwegian Front Altair, defunct and forced their crews to abandon ship ⁠— has not yet been conclusively proven.

The U.S. and the Saudis say it's Iran, while the U.K. says they're "almost certain" of the same; Iran vociferously denies it. But video footage and photographs from U.S. CENTCOM provides what a range of security experts say is credible evidence of Iranian responsibility.

Iran Airstrike That Was Called Off by Trump Had Limited Targets

Iran Airstrike That Was Called Off by Trump Had Limited Targets President Donald Trump approved military strikes on Iran after an American drone was shot down by Iranian armed forces, but then decided not to go through with them, the New York Times reported Thursday night.

Venezuelan forces will escort Iranian tankers arriving with much-needed fuel. Comes after Iran raised concerns of potential aggression from the US. Neither Maduro nor Padrino said when the ships, which according to press reports number five and sailed from Iran in the past days, will arrive.

British-flagged oil tanker Stena Impero was seized by Iran on Friday as it sailed through the Strait of The Iranians then tell the British warship: 'No challenge is intended I want to inspect the ship for Seventeen alleged CIA spies have been arrested in Iran and some of them will face the death penalty

'They want to hit where it hurts': Why elements in Iran would blow up foreign tankers© Provided by CNBC LLC This photo is a view of hull penetration/blast damage sustained from a limpet mine attack on the starboard side of motor vessel M/T Kokuka Courageous, while operating in the Gulf of Oman, June 13, 2019.

Here's a look at what might've driven elements within Iran, particularly its Revolutionary Guard Corps, to carry out the June 13 attacks.

1. Iran 'has nothing to lose'

"Iran has probably arrived at the conclusion that it has less to lose from acting this way than from doing nothing," Aniseh Tabrizi, a research fellow and Iran expert at London's Royal United Services Institute, told CNBC via phone Tuesday.

"There is a gamble behind it that wasn't there before, which is: 'If other countries retaliate, we are willing to take the risk because we have really nothing to lose at this point'," Tabrizi described. "And that is a dangerous way to feel."

Iran's economy is expected to shrink by 6% this year, after having contracted 3.9% last year, the International Monetary Fund says. By contrast, it clocked 3.8% growth in 2017, before the Trump administration re-imposed economic sanctions after withdrawing from the 2015 nuclear deal that offered the Islamic Republic relief from prior sanctions.

If the U.S. strikes Iran, what might happen next?

If the U.S. strikes Iran, what might happen next? Analysis: After a strike like the one Trump says he cancelled, officials and experts warn Iran might hit back via proxy forces far from the Middle East.

Iranian tankers have been accused of flouting international rules by turning off their Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponders. The plummeting oil sales have also led to a significant fall in Iran 's foreign exchange earnings. The IMF estimates that Iran 's reserves of foreign currency have

Declassified images allegedly show Iran behind tanker attacks. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi acknowledged the tensions with Iran in a statement late Monday but urged the administration to brief Congress Where 's the carrot? Why should Iran now talk and with what outcome? What's the idea?

The combination of hard-hitting sanctions, particularly on the country's oil exports that began last November, as well as years of economic mismanagement have led to skyrocketing unemployment and inflation headed toward 40%.

"The more the U.S. maximum pressure policy succeeds in driving the Iranian economy into the ground," Ali Vaez, Iran Project Director at Crisis Group, told CNBC, "the less risk averse the Iranians will become and the more aggressive they're likely to be."

2. Calling Trump's bluff

"It's all about careful calibration and plausible deniability," Hussein Ibish, a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, told CNBC.

Iran's suspected asymmetric warfare, executed with limited intensity and deniability, is designed to disrupt but not provoke a military response, Iran experts say. The attacks so far, if carried out by the IRGC, have specifically avoided civilian deaths and environmental damage like an oil spill.

Instead, the IRGC or its naval equivalent may be sending the message that it's capable of undermining U.S. and Arab Gulf states' interests in the region. And if they feel they can get away with it, it's because they're banking on President Donald Trump not wanting to actually start a war.

Iran’s foreign minister tweets images he says ‘leaves no doubt’ U.S. drone was over Iranian airspace

Iran’s foreign minister tweets images he says ‘leaves no doubt’ U.S. drone was over Iranian airspace Iran says that the RQ-4A Global Hawk was targeted after penetrating Iranian airspace early Thursday — a claim U.S. military officials deny. The aircraft was flying over international waters in the strait, where two commercial tankers were attacked with explosives last week. President Trump authorized a military strike on Iran in response to the downing of the aircraft, but abruptly aborted the mission late Thursday, citing a potentially high casualty count. Tensions have spiked in the Persian Gulf region in recent weeks following a string of assaults on commercial vessels there.

"Ultimately, Iran's intention is to call President Trump's bluff," says Ibish.

'They want to hit where it hurts': Why elements in Iran would blow up foreign tankers© Provided by CNBC LLC Imagery taken from a U.S. Navy MH-60R helicopter that allegedly shows Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy after removing an unexploded limpet mine from the M/T Kokuka Courageous.

And indeed, Trump told Time Magazine in an interview this week that he views the tanker incidents as "very minor", suggesting that attacks of this nature are not worth going to war over.

The administration has already gone almost all out on economic sanctions, "So the repercussions are virtually nil," says Ibish.

"That's one reason why Iran is taking these actions: they have nothing to lose except getting into a war they don't want, but which Trump does not want either. And that's what they're testing right now."

3. 'Hit them where it hurts' — oil and shipping security

Iranian leaders have often threatened that if they can't export their oil, neither will anyone else. And last week's suspected attacks took place near the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway for 30% of the world's seaborne oil traffic.

Combined with the four tankers allegedly sabotaged off the United Arab Emirates' coast of Fujairah on May 12, last week's attacks "appear to be part of a systematic Iranian effort to demonstrate that peace and security in the Gulf is contingent on its own economic stability," political consultancy Eurasia Group said in a June 13 briefing.

Facing Intensifying Confrontation With Iran, Trump Has Few Appealing Options

Facing Intensifying Confrontation With Iran, Trump Has Few Appealing Options President Trump’s last-minute decision to pull back from a retaliatory strike on Iran underscored the absence of appealing options available to him as Tehran races toward its next big challenge to the United States: building up and further enriching its stockpile of nuclear fuel. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "has made threats to the Americans saying we're going to hit where it hurts — and the hydrocarbon lifeline of the Strait of Hormuz is what hurts," Andreas Krieg, a lecturer at the School of Security Studies at King's College London, told CNBC.

Targeting commercial tankers and oil traffic hurts Iran as well, Krieg says — "but the Iranians have their backs against the wall, and there's very little they can lose because they're already in a state of absolute loss after the imposition of the maximum pressure sanctions regime."

4. Deterrence and leverage

"If the Iranians were indeed behind this then I think the main motive is to deter the U.S. from further ratcheting up pressure on Iranian oil exports," says Crisis Group's Vaez.

"But this also has the added benefit of ransoming the oil market which will jack up the price on shipping insurance premiums, and this will allow the Iranians to compensate to a certain extent for the loss of their oil exports as a result of U.S. sanctions."

And for Iran, this type of unconventional warfare also demonstrates that it can wreak significant damage on Western interests at a fairly low financial cost, something that can't be said for the U.S. military.

"The Iranians have a lot more flexibility and political will to operate in this area than the Americans," says Krieg. "The problem with the Americans is there is no political will, there's limited capability to strike back, and the costs are exponentially higher."

5. History

Iran's offensive military actions have been defined by asymmetry for decades, and its alleged use of sea mines on June 13 has precedent.

Allies See a Familiar U.S. Pattern in Trump’s Iran Reversal

Allies See a Familiar U.S. Pattern in Trump’s Iran Reversal Some framed it as another empty threat from a leader whose bark is consistently worse than his bite. Some saw a method to the perceived madness — a potentially shrewd act of brinkmanship. And others considered it simply the latest act of an America that, long before President Trump, has often oscillated from isolation to intervention, and back. 

In the final years of the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the U.S. military captured footage of Iran's navy laying sea mines — and when some of them hit an American missile frigate in the Persian Gulf, the U.S. military subsequently wiped out half the Iranian navy. The 1988 offensive, dubbed Operation Praying Mantis, was the largest surface naval engagement since World War Two. The U.S. swiftly destroyed multiple Iranian oil platforms, sea bases and ships, sending oil prices upward.

"The Iranians have spent the last 15 years planning how to use unconventional means to either seize or attack a tanker or other naval ships," said Krieg. "They're absolute pros at this, they're probably better than any other navy."

Many analysts maintain that it's still possible the attacks were carried out by a rogue element of the Iranian system, or even a third party. But for Ibish and others, including the U.S. intelligence community, the culprit is obvious, and they say that's either the IRGC — which the U.S. designated a terrorist group in April — or one of its naval equivalents. Two weeks after the U.S. designation, Khamenei appointed Major General Hossein Salami as the IRGC's new commander, a war-hardened veteran of the Iran-Iraq war with particularly hardline and anti-Western views.

"The status quo is not sustainable for Iran," says Ibish. "So they have the means, the motives and the opportunity… They do not seek a war, exactly, but they are obviously willing to risk one in order to get out of an impossible conundrum."

Read More

US and Iran showdown goes from terrible to worse.
Fresh fury flying between President Donald Trump and Iran shows why the threat of a disastrous war was not averted by his last minute decision to call off "cocked and loaded" US air strikes to avenge the downing of a US drone last week. Iran reacted furiously on Tuesday to a new set of sanctions imposed by Washington, including on Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, by accusing the US of suffering a "mental disability." In response, Trump fired off an inflammatory swipe on Twitter, warning that some Iranian forces would face "obliteration" if it attacked any Americans.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!