•   
  •   
  •   

World White House Memo Justifying Suleimani Strike Cites No Imminent Threat

22:10  14 february  2020
22:10  14 february  2020 Source:   nytimes.com

Lawmakers say CBP admits breaching protocol targeting Iranian Americans

  Lawmakers say CBP admits breaching protocol targeting Iranian Americans Customs and Border Protection admitted to inappropriately targeting Iranian Americans and breaching agency protocol last month when travelers were held at the northern US border, according to lawmakers who met with government officials about the incident. © Joe Raedle/Getty Images A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer's patch is seen in 2015 in Miami, Florida. Last month, reports surfaced that Iranian Americans were detained at the Blaine crossing in Washington state in the wake of the US killing of a top Iranian general, Qasem Soleimani.

Iranians attending the funeral procession of Maj. Gen. Qassem Suleimani in Tehran last month.Credit Wana News Agency, via Reuters.

The White House told Congress on Friday that President Donald Trump authorized the strike last month that killed Iran’s most important general to respond to attacks that had already taken place. https Qassem Soleimani cites no imminent threat .

WASHINGTON — The White House told Congress on Friday that President Trump authorized the strike last month that killed Iran’s most important general to respond to attacks that had already taken place and deter future ones, contradicting the president’s claim that he acted in response to an imminent threat.

Qasem Soleimani with smoke coming out of it: Iranians attending the funeral procession of Maj. Gen. Qassem Suleimani in Tehran last month.© Wana News Agency, via Reuters Iranians attending the funeral procession of Maj. Gen. Qassem Suleimani in Tehran last month.

In a legally mandated, two-page unclassified memo to lawmakers, the White House asserted that the strike that killed Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani was “in response to an escalating series of attacks in preceding months” by Iran and Iran-backed militias.

Trump Claims End of ‘American Decline’ While Avoiding Mention of Impeachment

  Trump Claims End of ‘American Decline’ While Avoiding Mention of Impeachment President Trump claimed credit for a “great American comeback” in a speech to Congress on Tuesday night, boasting of a robust economy, contrasting his successes with the records of his predecessors and projecting optimism in the face of a monthslong Democratic effort to force him from office. Mr. Trump, who lamented what he called “American carnage” when he was inaugurated in January 2017, described a different country today, declaring in his third State of the Union address that the nation’s future was once again “blazing bright.

WASHINGTON — The White House told Congress on Friday that President Trump authorized the strike last month that killed Iran’s most important general to respond to attacks In a legally mandated, two-page unclassified memo to lawmakers, the White House asserted that the strike that killed Maj.

A new report sent to Congress about the drone strike that killed Iran’s top general contradicted the original justification the administration provided. Gen. Qassem Suleimani in Tehran last month.Credit Wana News Agency, via Reuters.

“The purposes of this action were to protect United States personnel, to deter Iran from conducting or supporting further attacks against United States forces and interests, to degrade Iran’s and Quds Force-backed militias’s ability to conduct attacks, and to end Iran’s strategic escalation of attacks,” said the report, which was transmitted on Friday to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

The document confirmed what lawmakers had privately suspected as the Trump administration has offered a shifting set of justifications for the strike against General Suleimani in Baghdad — taken with no congressional consultation — which brought the United States and Iran to the brink of war.

His tale of crossing Antarctica was riveting. But how much was fiction?

  His tale of crossing Antarctica was riveting. But how much was fiction? Colin O’Brady says he crossed Antarctica alone and “unassisted.” Polar experts say he’s embellishing his accomplishments in pursuit of fame.Colin O'Brady prepares to fly back north after his Antarctic expedition, Jan. 3, 2019. The media embraced his accomplishment as "historic," but questions about the legitimacy of his claims from the adventure community soon arose.

“The White House told Congress on Friday that President Trump authorized the strike last month that killed Iran’s most important general to respond to attacks that had already taken place and deter future ones, contradicting the president’s claim that he acted in response to an imminent threat ,” the New

The Trump administration has repeatedly insisted that its decision to kill Iranian General Qasem Soleimani was justified because he posed an " imminent threat " to American lives, but that phrase was notably absent in an official White House report sent to Congress that outlines the legal and policy

“This official report directly contradicts the president’s false assertion that he attacked Iran to prevent an imminent attack against United States personnel and embassies,” Representative Eliot L. Engel of New York, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement. “The administration’s explanation in this report makes no mention of any imminent threat and shows that the justification the president offered to the American people was false, plain and simple.”

Slideshow by photo services

In the days after the strike that killed General Suleimani, administration officials gave a variety of rationales for the action as they confronted questions about why the president undertook such a provocative move that could incite an escalation with a dangerous rival. Mr. Trump and other top officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, said the strike was conducted in response to imminent threats to American lives, but they declined to provide any evidence, leaving lawmakers in both parties irate.

How Months of Miscalculation Led the U.S. and Iran to the Brink of War

  How Months of Miscalculation Led the U.S. and Iran to the Brink of War WASHINGTON — In late September, a plane carrying senior Iranian officials touched down in Abu Dhabi, the gleaming capital of the United Arab Emirates. The Middle East had witnessed a summer of violence, and a meeting with the Iranians was part of a quiet strategy by Emirati leaders to defuse the tension. The small but powerful Persian Gulf nation wanted to broker a separate peace — avoiding violence that could shatter its decades-long effort to present itself as a modern, stable oasis in a volatile region. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Pressed over several days, Mr. Pompeo conceded that the United States did not have specific intelligence on where or when an attack would take place. Mr. Trump claimed that four American embassies had been targeted for attacks, but under questioning during a television interview, Mark T. Esper, the secretary of defense, said he had seen no evidence of that.

Mr. Trump later insisted on Twitter that General Suleimani had, in fact, been planning an imminent attack on United States forces, but added, “it doesn’t really matter because of his horrible past!”

The report on Friday came a day after the Senate passed a resolution aimed at restraining Mr. Trump’s war-making powers with Iran. The rare bipartisan vote illustrated the depth of the skepticism in both parties about the president’s strategy, and lawmakers’ frustration with the administration’s refusal to consult Congress on military matters. The House is expected to pass the measure soon, sending it to the president’s desk. Mr. Trump’s advisers have said he will veto it.

The White House infuriated lawmakers in early January when it sent Congress a formal notification of the drone strikes required under the War Powers Act. Lawmakers had expected it to lay out a legal justification for the strike, but the entire document was classified, and officials who read it said it contained no information on future threats or an imminent attack.

Lawmakers were further angered by a series of briefings delivered by top administration officials that they described as insulting and demeaning, complaining that they were dismissed for questioning the administration’s strategy.

Highly Secretive Iranian Rebels Are Holed Up in Albania. They Gave Us a Tour.

  Highly Secretive Iranian Rebels Are Holed Up in Albania. They Gave Us a Tour. MANEZ, Albania — In a valley in the Albanian countryside, a group of celibate Iranian dissidents have built a vast and tightly guarded barracks that few outsiders have ever entered. Depending on whom you ask, the group, the Mujahedeen Khalq, or People’s Jihadists, are either Iran’s replacement government-in-waiting or a duplicitous terrorist cult. Journalists are rarely allowed inside the camp to judge for themselves, and are sometimes rebuffed by force.Sign Up For the Morning Briefing NewsletterBut after President Trump’s decision to assassinate Qassim Suleimani, a powerful Iranian general, it seemed worth trying again.

Friday’s report also only discussed previous acts of aggression by Iran. It cited as a legal framework the president’s constitutional powers as commander in chief and the authorization for the use of military force in Iraq that Congress passed in 2002, using two justifications the administration has previously mentioned.

“Iran’s past and recent activities, coupled with intelligence at the time of the airstrike, indicated that Iran’s Quds force posed a threat to the United States in Iraq,” the report said.

Congressional Democrats have coalesced behind a new push to repeal the 2002 law, which was passed to authorize a military response to Saddam Hussein and his government. They said Mr. Trump’s broad reading of it illustrated how the statute has been stretched and distorted to accommodate missions that Congress never envisioned when it was debated.

“To suggest that 18 years later this authorization could justify killing an Iranian official stretches the law far beyond anything Congress ever intended,” Mr. Engel said.

The House last month voted to repeal the 2002 law, with lawmakers in both parties arguing that the authorization had become outdated and been abused by presidents as a blank check to circumvent Congress in taking military action. During negotiations on the annual defense policy bill, the White House, focused on creating the Space Force as the sixth branch of military and maintaining the ability to divert military construction funds to pay for the border wall, was initially open to repealing the 2002 law, but the Pentagon intervened.

Iran votes in parliament elections that favors conservatives .
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iranians began voting for a new parliament Friday, with turnout seen as a key measure of support for Iran's leadership as sanctions weigh on the economy and isolate the country diplomatically. The disqualification of some 9,000 potential candidates, most of them reformists and moderates, raised the possibility of lower-than-usual turnout.Iran's leadership and state media urged voter participation, with some framing it as a religious duty. Earlier this week, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said high voter turnout will thwart "plots and plans” by Americans and supporters of Israel against Iran.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!