•   
  •   
  •   

World Hopes dim for nuclear agreement with Russia before Election Day

15:00  23 october  2020
15:00  23 october  2020 Source:   politico.com

What is the New Start, this treaty which revives tensions between Washington and Moscow?

 What is the New Start, this treaty which revives tensions between Washington and Moscow? With this agreement signed in 2010 and which expires in 2021, the two world powers had undertaken to drastically reduce their nuclear arsenal. © Getty Images / AFP In 2010, Barack Obama and Dmitri Medvedev signed the New Start Treaty in Prague. The Russian-American relationship suddenly took a turn for the worse overnight.

With only weeks to go until the general election , the Trump administration is renewing a push to finalize a nuclear agreement with Moscow, hoping that a deal may force China to reconsider its position on trilateral arms talks. In case Russia doesn't agree to it before the vote, the US could demand

Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov, Russia 's main arms control negotiator, warned that such China has rejected US calls to join the talks with Russia , citing its smaller nuclear arsenal. US officials drafted the proposal in the form of a political agreement that would become a treaty once

President Donald Trump has been eager to notch a major foreign policy election-season win on arms control with Russia — and that prospect looked promising early this week when Moscow appeared to give in to a major U.S. demand.

Chad Pennington et al. standing next to a man in a suit and tie: Wearing a face mask to reduce the chance of transmission of the novel coronavirus, White House National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien (R) arrives at the U.S. Capitol for a meeting with Republican senators © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Wearing a face mask to reduce the chance of transmission of the novel coronavirus, White House National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien (R) arrives at the U.S. Capitol for a meeting with Republican senators

But a top Trump official, and now Russian President Vladimir Putin, are making clear there is still a serious divide between the two nuclear heavyweights.

Decoding Russian nuclear war propaganda targeting Germany and NATO

  Decoding Russian nuclear war propaganda targeting Germany and NATO A top Russian military commentator is enraged over reports in the German newspaper, Bild, that NATO carried out a recent nuclear weapons exercise in Germany. © Provided by Washington Examiner The idea that "cretins" in Chancellor Angela Merkel's government allowed such an exercise, Konstantin Sivkov told a Kremlin media outlet, indicates that "German policy is directed by very narrow-minded people, perhaps not quite mentally healthy." This is because "practicing nuclear war in Germany is a suicidal step. Especially for Germany." Sivkov was just getting started.

There is hope that the last remaining nuclear arms pact between the US and Russia can be extended after Washington said it wanted to immediately finalise an agreement . The New Start treaty, signed in 2010, limits the number of long-range nuclear warheads that each side can possess.

Days until election day . News| Nuclear Weapons. The last US- Russia strategic nuclear arms control pact appeared on track to win a one-year extension, as The apparent breakthrough, coming after months of difficult talks and two weeks before the United States presidential election , appeared

National security adviser Robert O'Brien is cautioning that an agreement to extend the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty for another year is not “a done deal,” insisting that negotiators must still iron out the procedures for verifying the terms of an agreement “that are suitable to both parties.”

At issue is Washington's requirement that an extension of the 10-year-old agreement include a temporary freeze on all nuclear weapons, including strategic weapons covered by the treaty and tactical weapons that aren't.

“In any negotiation but especially in arms control, the devil is always in the details,” O'Brien said in an interview. “Assuming that we can get suitable verification on the freeze, I think we should be able to get a deal. At least I hope so. I think we will propose something very shortly in the next couple days, or next week.”

Trump's hunt for foreign policy wins hits Russian wall

  Trump's hunt for foreign policy wins hits Russian wall President Trump's efforts to secure foreign policy wins heading into the presidential election have hit a wall in arms control talks with Russia.The Russians, perhaps hedging their bets in case Democratic nominee Joe Biden wins in November, recently rejected the Trump administration's latest offer, while on Friday, the administration rejected Moscow's counter-offer to extend the existing New START treaty.The impasse has dimmed prospects for a deal before Election Day, depriving Trump of an accomplishment he could tout in the remaining days of the campaign.

The sole remaining US- Russia nuclear arms control deal may get a last-moment extension after all, but everything now depends on what the US State Department means when it says warhead caps need to be Expanding the limit to warheads in storage has never been done before , according to Reif.

Three congressional investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election have run into serious obstacles, and definitive conclusions are now unlikely. The first, written by Republicans, is expected to forcefully say there is no proof that anyone around Mr. Trump worked with Russia to tip the election .

Putin on Thursday threw more cold water on the prospect of an imminent victory for Trump.

“The agreement expires in February and what I proposed is very simple,” Putin said in an online appearance at the Valdai forum in Moscow, Bloomberg reported. “Nothing terrible will happen if we extend it for a year, without preconditions, and we can continue to work with determination on resolving all the issues that concern us and the Americans.”

Washington has already rejected an extension without preconditions, so the comments dimmed hopes for an agreement just days after Putin indicated that his government was open to a one-year freeze, including tactical weapons that aren't covered by New START.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov also told a Russian newspaper on Thursday that the two sides are far from a deal.

"So far, at this stage, it cannot be said that we are on the verge of agreements, and that an appropriate agreement or even a common understanding of a political nature as to whether START will be extended and, in general, what can happen in this area, is within reach," he told Kommersant, according to a translation provided by the Arms Control Association.

Trump looks for foreign policy wins ahead of election

  Trump looks for foreign policy wins ahead of election The administration is trying to rescue an arms control deal with Russia and secure the release of Americans held in Syria.The United States and Russia inched closer to an arms control deal Tuesday after Moscow said it would support a Trump administration proposal to freeze nuclear warheads for a year and extend the last major nuclear arms control treaty between the two powers, known as New START.

Kremlin hopes for further contacts with US over New START. "We appreciate the Russian Federation’s willingness to make progress on the issue of nuclear arms control. The United States is prepared to meet immediately to finalize a verifiable agreement .

Russia Dismisses Trump Hope of Nuclear Deal Before U.S. Election Bloomberg17:35 14-Oct-20. Trump administration renews push for nuclear arms agreement with Russia before election Trump working behind scene to reach nuclear accord with Russia before election Premium Times

The treaty, which went into force in 2010, caps the U.S. and Russia’s long-range weapons at 1,550 warheads and 700 delivery systems, such as missiles, bombers and submarines. The pact also stipulates that it can be extended up to five years if both sides agree.

But a number of experts see weakening chances to extend New START unless Russia concedes to U.S. demands or the Trump administration is willing to accept little more than a freeze on paper at this stage and a commitment to keep talking.

The U.S. and Russia both have large undeclared stockpiles of nuclear arms, including tactical or battlefield nuclear weapons that are much more difficult to track than the weapons that are covered by New START, which can more easily be monitored from satellites and other intelligence-gathering means.

For example, the director of national intelligence has estimated that Russia has at least 2,000 and as many as 5,000 tactical weapons that it has never publicly declared.

“You can’t freeze what you can’t count, so you have to get an accurate count,” said Peter Huessy, director of strategic deterrent studies at the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. “New START gives us a fuzzy start. The hard part will be to freeze non-strategic systems which are not even accounted for.”

Trump vs. Biden on the issues: Foreign policy

  Trump vs. Biden on the issues: Foreign policy Trump's changed America's role in the world while Biden vows to "restore" it. But in recent years, foreign policy has become as politically charged as virtually everything else in American life, and when voters mail in their ballots or go to the polls, they'll face a stark difference between the Republican and Democratic nominee and their views of the world and the United States' place in it.

Top lawmakers insisted that a bipartisan agreement remained possible, although recent phone calls between Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Mr. Mnuchin have But economists and Mr. Trump’s own recent history suggest that any significant aid to the economy before the election would need to be provided

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - US President Donald Trump administration's push for a one-year nuclear deal with Russia after years of dragging its feet on the New START extension is a clear attempt to secure a foreign policy victory ahead of the November 3 presidential election , Angela Kane

He predicted that fashioning a viable process for verifying a freeze of both sides’ entire nuclear arsenals would take “many months” and “probably over a year." That could mean a freeze will not be formalized until after the treaty extension expires.

The National Academy of Sciences is conducting a study for the Trump administration on what it would take to verify that the Russians have frozen all their “theater systems,” or shorter-range nuclear weapons.

Trump’s top arms control negotiator, Ambassador Marshall Billingslea, was in Europe this week to brief NATO allies on the status of negotiations and to keep pursuing a deal with the Russians. His office did not respond to a request for comment.

Richard Burt, the U.S. ambassador to Germany for Ronald Reagan who negotiated the first START agreement on behalf of George H.W. Bush, agreed that a freeze can only be agreed to in principle at this stage given the major unknowns about the Russian arsenal and the technical nature of any verification regime, which would also likely include on-site inspections as called for in New START.

“Sometimes it can take more than a year,” he said in an interview. “That’s been the history of these agreements. Moving to a complete ban on warheads, including those that are either in storage or in reserve — which were never been limited before — is a very big step.”

How battleground states process mail ballots -- and why it may mean delayed results

  How battleground states process mail ballots -- and why it may mean delayed results More Americans are voting by mail this election than usual, due to the pandemic. But processing those ballots takes more time. Here's how it works in battleground states. Because of the pandemic, more voters are opting to cast their ballots by mail this year. While the expanded access and increased use of mail-in voting is good for voters, it does create hardships for already strained election officials in many states, including key battlegrounds.

But Burt, whose advice was sought by the State Department this year on how to proceed, also said the Trump administration has itself to blame for so little time to finalize an acceptable deal.

He pointed out that Putin, in his first telephone call with Trump in 2017, raised the possibility of extending the treaty but Trump denounced the agreement as an Obama-era relic and a bad deal.

“This administration has known since that very call that they needed to take a decision on this existing treaty,” said Burt, who is now chairman of the disarmament group Global Zero. “And they basically did nothing about it for three-and-a-half years.

“The administration has committed diplomatic malpractice by pushing this very ambitious concept at the last minute,” he added. “It seems to me they're very anxious to demonstrate they've done something in this area. But they didn't approach it in a really thoughtful, professional way that gives them enough time to really work through all the issues and problems.”

The Trump administration’s longer term plans are even more ambitious. It also wants to include China in a broader arms control agreement, but the Chinese have shown no interest in coming to the table.

That’s “really a shame,” O’Brien said, noting that “it would be better for all parties, for the whole world” if Beijing agreed to constrain its relatively small but growing nuclear arsenal.

The Pentagon most recently assessed that Beijing has a total nuclear arsenal in the low 200s, and is on track to at least double that number over the next decade. That is significantly less than both America's and Russia’s stockpiles. According to the Federation of American Scientists’ Nuclear Information Project, which tracks global inventories of atomic arms, the U.S. has 3,800 warheads while Russia has 4,310.

Former FBI special agent on election threat posed by Russia, China, Iran

  Former FBI special agent on election threat posed by Russia, China, Iran On "Intelligence Matters," Mike Morell speaks with Clint Watts about the potential election intereference threats posed by these three countries.In this episode of Intelligence Matters, host Michael Morell interviews former FBI Special Agent Clint Watts, current Distinguished Research Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute and Non-Resident Fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy and author of Messing With The Enemy: Surviving in a Social Media World of Hackers, Terrorists, Russians and Fake News. Watts offers his analysis of Russia, China, and Iran and their respective threats to election security.

“The Communist Party of China doesn’t seem to be interested at this point, so we will do the best we can with the Russians now and we will deal with the Chinese another [time],” O’Brien said. “I don’t think there’s any reason to have an arms race in 2020.”

Russia also may be dragging its feet in anticipation of a change in U.S. administration. Joe Biden has indicated that he would extend the deal for five years without preconditions to buy time to negotiate a more comprehensive follow-on agreement.

This is not the first time the negotiations between Washington and Moscow have broken down. O’Brien provided a glimpse into the last few weeks of frantic negotiations to clinch a deal on extending New START before it expires on Feb. 5.

Talks stalled this fall after the U.S. rejected Putin’s first offer to extend the treaty for five years without any preconditions. Trump dispatched O’Brien to Geneva to meet with his Russian counterpart. Nikolai Patrushev, “to see if we could break that logjam,” O’Brien said.

The U.S. proposed extending the agreement by one year in exchange for a freeze on all nuclear warheads, including those not covered by the original agreement. At the time, the Russians indicated that such a deal would be “acceptable,” O’Brien said. But last Friday Putin appeared to backtrack, making a new offer to extend the treaty for one year without preconditions.

In response, O’Brien called out in public comments and on social media the Russian proposal was a “non-starter” unless Moscow also agreed to a temporary freeze on all nuclear weapons in return. The Russians appeared to relent on Tuesday, offering what they called a new proposal to extend the agreement for one year in exchange for capping nuclear warheads.

“They claimed it’s their proposal, which is fine because I don’t care who gets the credit for it as long as it’s a good deal,” O’Brien said, noting that his tweet likely played a role in their decision to back down. “They referenced social media by a U.S. official — I assume that was referring to me.”

The one-year extension would give the two parties “some breathing space” in which to negotiate a future long-term deal, O’Brien said.

But any such deal now appears to be even further off.

"We have to admit that the degree of our discrepancies is very serious," Ryabkov told Kommersant.

Survey: Nearly 2 out of 3 voters will cast their ballots early in-person or by mail, not on Election Day .
The survey showed a significant partisan divide, too. Those supporting Biden are more likely to say they plan to vote by mail than those who support Trump.When combining those who are voting by mail (42%) and those who voting early in-person (26%), nearly 2 in 3 voters will be casting their ballot ahead of Election Day, according to a survey from the Democracy Fund + UCLA Nationscape Project.

usr: 3
This is interesting!