World A special Kosovo war crimes court will try its ex-president. So how do ‘hybrid’ courts work?

14:30  23 november  2020
14:30  23 november  2020 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage

  Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage "Supreme Court Justices aren't supposed to be political hacks.," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. "This right-wing speech is nakedly partisan."Alito said the restrictions imposed by political leaders in order to contain the coronavirus pandemic have "resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty" and denounced recent Supreme Court decisions holding up orders he believed discriminated against religious groups. He argued the pandemic highlighted a wider assault on religious freedom as conservative views are increasing equated with "bigotry.

A special court is being set up in The Hague to try war crimes committed during the war in The court is set to begin operating later this year. The conflict pitted ethnic Albanian rebels against It eventually withdrew its troops from Kosovo after a two-month campaign of air strikes by Nato in 1999.

A special court in The Hague has begun hearings on war crimes committed by Kosovo ’s former separatist fighters, more than two decades after its war for independence from Serbia and nine years after a prosecutor was first appointed to investigate reports of atrocities. Over the past week the

Kosovo’s former president Hashim Thaci stepped down this month to face war crimes charges in The Hague. Thaci, a former high-ranking member of the Kosovo Liberation Army that fought against Serbia in the 1990s, was indicted by the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (KSC & SPO), an unusual criminal court with a unique institutional setup.

Hashim Thaci, Hashim Thaci are posing for a picture: Hashim Thaci, who resigned as Kosovo’s president to face war crimes charges, makes his first appearance before a judge this month in The Hague. (Jerry Lampen/Pool/AP) Hashim Thaci, who resigned as Kosovo’s president to face war crimes charges, makes his first appearance before a judge this month in The Hague. (Jerry Lampen/Pool/AP)

Established through a constitutional amendment and parliamentary legislation, the KSC & SPO is part of Kosovo’s domestic court system. At the same time, it is heavily internationalized. Created in conjunction with the European Union and based in the Netherlands, the court is staffed by international judges and prosecutors and applies both Kosovar laws and international customary and human rights law when making its decisions.

After taking Karabakh, Azerbaijan must watch out for Russia

  After taking Karabakh, Azerbaijan must watch out for Russia The recapture of the Karabakh region from Armenia by Azerbaijan’s forces has unleashed a storm of both outrage and ambition in Europe’s east. In the Western Balkans, it may reignite Serbian aspirations to reconquer Kosovo, while in Georgia, Ukraine, and Moldova, it could reinforce convictions that territories currently occupied by Russia will eventually also be regained. © Provided by Washington Examiner The case of Kosovo is the most distinct, despite the veiled warning of Serbian President Aleksander Vucic that Kosovo could be reoccupied by Serbian troops.

Kosovo President Hashim Thaci has been accused of war crimes by a special international prosecutor in The Hague. The EU-backed court was set up to investigate the claims. Mr Thaci has been in power in Kosovo since the end of the war - most recently as president of Kosovo .

A new court set up in The Netherlands will try suspects for war crimes against ethnic Serbs, committed during the conflict over independence for Kosovo . Guy Delauney explains.

The KSC & SPO belongs to a distinct category of international criminal justice mechanisms called “hybrid courts.” By combining domestic and international elements, these courts have the flexibility to overcome some of the legitimacy problems that have plagued the International Criminal Court (ICC) and other international tribunals when they have tried to hold war criminals accountable.

The ICC was expected to replace hybrid courts

Legal experts first floated the idea of a hybrid criminal court in the late 1990s. Then-U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan tasked a group of experts with developing a legal mechanism for prosecuting the Khmer Rouge for atrocities committed during its rule in Cambodia between 1975 and 1979.

Fact check: Fake Trump tweet echoing Halsey song lyrics originally began as a joke

  Fact check: Fake Trump tweet echoing Halsey song lyrics originally began as a joke A doctored image shows Trump tweeted Halsey lyrics about losing the election. This fake tweet, which doesn't appear on his profile, was a joke.“I was red… and you liked him cause he was blue.. then you touched me.. and i was a lilac sky.. but then you all decided that purple just wasn’t for you,” reads an Instagram post containing what appears to be a quote of a tweet from Trump.

Kosovo 's President Hashim Thaci has rejected a war crimes indictment he is facing, calling it an In his first comments since the move by prosecutors at a court in The Hague, Mr Thaci said A special international prosecutor in The Hague says. Mr Thaci and others "are criminally responsible for nearly

Kosovo Response. The court , which is investigating crimes against ethnic Serbs, Roma, other minorities and political dissidents during and after the Kadri Veseli, a former head of Kosovo ’s parliament and ex -commander in the rebel force accused along with Thaci, rejected the charges as

After years of intense negotiations, the United Nations and the Cambodian government agreed on an institutional arrangement integrating international and national law, judges and funding structures. Leaders adopted similar hybrid arrangements in response to violence and conflicts in East Timor, Sierra Leone, Bosnia and Lebanon.

When the ICC was established in 2002, many assumed that the hybrid model would disappear. The ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal justice institution, and many observers expected it to replace ad hoc arrangements such as hybrid courts.

‘States of Justice’ asks tough questions about the International Criminal Court

But hybrid criminal justice mechanisms are again appearing around the world.

In 2015, a hybrid court in Senegal sentenced the former president of Chad, Hissène Habré, to life imprisonment for crimes against humanity, torture and war crimes. In the Central African Republic, a U.N.-backed hybrid tribunal is investigating armed conflict and violence against civilians. And efforts to create a hybrid justice mechanism to examine South Sudan’s violent transitional period are underway.

Lawyers for Kosovo suspects: Trial can't start before 2022

  Lawyers for Kosovo suspects: Trial can't start before 2022 THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Defense lawyers for former leaders of Kosovo guerrillas, including ex-president Hashim Thaci, said Wednesday that their trial on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity cannot begin before the summer of 2022 at the earliest. The comments came at a procedural hearing in the case against Thaci and three other former leaders of the Kosovo Liberation Army who are in custody in The Hague awaiting trail on charges including murder, torture and illegal imprisonment allegedly committed during Kosovo's 1998-99 battle for independence from Serbia. They deny the allegations.

An EU-backed war crimes court called on Kosovo Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj to show up for questioning in the Hague, causing Haradinaj to unexpectedly resign on Friday. The UN court acquitted him in 2008, but that ruling was later declared invalid due to reports of witness intimidation.

Hybrid courts are defined as courts of mixed composition and jurisdiction, encompassing both The establishment of hybrid courts will not solve all these problems, but if strategically designed and In 2005, the Special War Crimes Chamber was estab-lished in Bosnia and Herzegovina by agreement

Academics and policymakers are also considering hybrid mechanisms for trying Islamic State fighters and prosecuting the grave international crimes during the conflict in Syria.

Why are hybrid courts making a comeback?

Compared with the ICC, hybrid courts can be tailored toward the specific historical, cultural and political context in which they operate. This is critical for building the foundation on which all justice mechanisms rest: legitimacy.

Legitimacy is the widespread belief that a court has the right to prosecute and dispense justice. Absent any police force or other way to enforce its decisions, the ICC and other international institutions rely heavily on the public perception of their legitimacy to ensure compliance.

But the ICC’s legitimacy is fragile. The court is staffed exclusively by international judges and prosecutors who are supposed to represent the global public and judge war criminals in the name of a common humanity. But “global public” and “common humanity” are abstract concepts that may mean very little to the victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity — or to those who committed or supported those crimes and feel accountable only to their home communities or nations. This distant claim makes it more difficult to convince various stakeholders that the ICC has the legitimate authority to prosecute and punish individuals around the world.

Fact check: Trump's campaign page has control over his designation as 'political candidate'

  Fact check: Trump's campaign page has control over his designation as 'political candidate' Trump has been designated as a political candidate long before the election and Facebook is not in charge of determining a page's titleMany supporters are criticizing Facebook, claiming the platform removed Trump's title of "President" on what many describe as his "official" Facebook page and downgraded it to "Political Candidate.

The ICC’s legitimacy has been further undermined by uneven geographical enforcement. After all, it has focused almost exclusively on crises in Africa. This has led African leaders to frame the ICC as a new form of imperialism, urging African nations to “get out of the court of the West.”

No evidence suggests that the ICC is explicitly targeting African individuals, but these allegations of anti-African bias are damaging the ICC’s reputation.

Despite U.S. sanctions, the International Criminal Court will continue investigating alleged war crimes in Afghanistan

Hybrid courts can tackle these problems. Incorporating domestic judges gives local communities authority over the trial. Incorporating domestic law and legal customs gives expression to the identities, historical experiences and cultural values that are specific to the society in which crimes have allegedly been committed.

Hybrid courts are also better suited to deal with the dual nature of international crimes. Genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity are assaults on the global public and direct attacks on local communities. Hybridity ensures that they are tried by both constituencies.

Perfection is impossible

Hybrid courts offer several advantages but are far from perfect. Incorporating locals from post-conflict societies raises its own set of problems, such as concerns over impartiality, witness protection and corruption.

But no international criminal justice mechanism will ever be perfect. After all, these courts deal with humanity’s worst crimes. They operate in extremely complex environments, facing political, legal and moral challenges. In the right circumstances, hybrid institutional arrangements can provide opportunities to address some of these challenges.

Don’t miss any of TMC’s smart analysis! Sign up for our newsletter.

Dennis R. Schmidt (@DennisRSchmidt) is a lecturer in international relations at Swansea University in the U.K. and a member of the Hybrid Justice Project, which analyzes the impact of hybrid courts in post-conflict and transitioning nations.

Supreme Court may give President Trump time to test census policy against undocumented immigrants .
The justices did not indicate whether they believe President Trump has the right to exclude as many as 11 million people from the population base.With only seven weeks remaining in President Donald Trump's term, the justices did not indicate whether they believe he has the right to exclude as many as 11 million people from the population base, a policy that would cost California and possibly other states seats in the House of Representatives.

usr: 10
This is interesting!