•   
  •   
  •   

World The Wuhan Lab and the Virus: The Dr. Fauci, Rand Paul Debate Fact-Checked and Explained

11:50  14 may  2021
11:50  14 may  2021 Source:   newsweek.com

Donald Trump Doesn't Understand Why Media Praised Fauci But Not Him: 'He Worked for Me'

  Donald Trump Doesn't Understand Why Media Praised Fauci But Not Him: 'He Worked for Me' "You wouldn't have a vaccine" if it weren't for me, Trump said. "It wouldn't have been here for three to five years, it probably wouldn't have happened at all."In a Tuesday interview with Candace Owens on the Daily Wire, the ex-president repeatedly criticized the U.S. media for allegedly covering his administration and family unfairly during his four years in office. Trump also touted his administration's ability to deliver the coronavirus vaccine and said the media failed to credit him for the effort.

Senator Rand Paul went on the attack in the Senate chambers earlier this week over the origins of the coronavirus that caused the current pandemic. In his questioning of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the senator raised the issue of whether the coronavirus jumped from animals to humans naturally (as coronaviruses tend to do) or was the result of experiments in which scientists took natural viruses, made them more deadly or infectious or both (which scientists all over the world do), and then somehow allowed it to escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Rand Paul wearing a suit and tie: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) listens during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington, D.C. on March 23, 2021. © Greg Nash/Getty Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) listens during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington, D.C. on March 23, 2021.

Senator Paul didn't directly accuse Dr. Fauci of engineering the pandemic, but that seemed at times to be his implication; it's a line of questioning that appeared to play to conspiracy theories that circulate on the internet. Although Dr. Fauci has had plenty of practice fending off Senator Paul's attacks in past encounters, this exchange seemed to unnerve him.

NHL's COVID protocol-related absences for May 8, 2021

  NHL's COVID protocol-related absences for May 8, 2021 Players in the protocol are: Colorado's Devan Dubnyk and Washington's Evgeny Kuznetsov.Calgary – TBA

One potential reason for Dr. Fauci's discomfort is that the prospect of a virus accidently being released from a lab and starting a pandemic is entirely plausible—so plausible, in fact, that scientists have warned about it for years.

Scientists in laboratories all over the world have for the past decade been collecting dangerous viruses and making them even more dangerous by performing "gain-of-function" experiments on them—manipulating the viruses to make them more infectious or deadly or both. The work is undertaken for the best of intentions—to understand and anticipate future pandemic viruses that could arise in nature—and much of this work has been done in the U.S. and abroad with funding from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Dr. Fauci leads.

Rand Paul clashes with Fauci over coronavirus origins

  Rand Paul clashes with Fauci over coronavirus origins Anthony Fauci clashed with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) over the role of the Wuhan virology lab in the origins of COVID-19.During a Senate hearing on the pandemic response, Paul alleged that the National Institutes of Health had been sending funding to the Wuhan lab, which then "juiced up" a virus that was originally found in bats to create a supervirus that can infect human cells. Paul pressed Fauci on the theory that the novel coronavirus was created in the Wuhan lab, and then somehow escaped, either because of an accident or because it was deliberately released."Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely, entirely and completely incorrect," Fauci said.

Some scientists who study pandemic viruses have lobbied the NIH to curb GOF research, but the NIH doesn't control all of it: much takes place in labs around the world, including at the Wuhan Institute. What's needed is thorough accounting of what gain-of-function work is currently going on in labs in the U.S. and everywhere else, as well as a public discussion of how to make sure that dangerous viruses don't escape. Lab accidents occur all too often, so it's no wonder that suspicions of lab accidents arise during a pandemic.

To say that a lab accident could start a pandemic is much different, of course, than claiming that a lab accident at the Wuhan Institute did start this particular pandemic. There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab in Wuhan or anywhere else.

The reaction of most scientists to the lab-origin theories has been to close ranks and defend their colleagues in China and elsewhere. To be sure, the drum-beat of blame towards China for starting the epidemic, which has a significant element of racism and xenophobia, is deplorable. But still, it's striking that scientists in the U.S. and elsewhere haven't protested China's lack of transparency more forcefully. That may be changing, however. On May 14, 18 scientists penned a letter in the journal Science that calls for a further investigation. That's good news, because until there's evidence that strongly discounts the lab-origin theory—or irrefutable evidence of a natural origin—the conspiracy theories will continue to undermine confidence in the legitimate work that scientists do.

Overnight Health Care: Biden announces 1M have enrolled in special ObamaCare sign-up period | Rand Paul clashes with Fauci over coronavirus origins | Biden vows to get 'more aggressive' on lifestyle benefits of vaccines

  Overnight Health Care: Biden announces 1M have enrolled in special ObamaCare sign-up period | Rand Paul clashes with Fauci over coronavirus origins | Biden vows to get 'more aggressive' on lifestyle benefits of vaccines Welcome to Tuesday's Overnight Health Care. Two fun vaccine motivators that make us wish we could take advantage: A Colorado resort is hosting a ski-in, ski-out clinic and offering a free bacon Bloody Mary, and the Talladega Superspeedway will allow people a chance to drive on its famous track if they get vaccinated, or even tested. If you have any tips, email us at nweixel@thehill.com, psullivan@thehill.com and jcoleman@thehill.com.Follow usIf you have any tips, email us at nweixel@thehill.com, psullivan@thehill.com and jcoleman@thehill.com.

So, how accurate were the statements Sen. Paul and Dr. Fauci offered in their exchange?

Anthony S. Fauci wearing a suit and tie looking at the camera: Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director at the National Institute Of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a hearing with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, on the Covid-19 response, on Capitol Hill on March 18, 2021 in Washington, DC. Fauci has dismissed the idea he was responsible for helping to create COVID-19. Anna Moneymaker-Pool/Getty Images © Anna Moneymaker-Pool/Getty Images Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director at the National Institute Of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a hearing with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, on the Covid-19 response, on Capitol Hill on March 18, 2021 in Washington, DC. Fauci has dismissed the idea he was responsible for helping to create COVID-19. Anna Moneymaker-Pool/Getty Images

Senator Paul: Dr. Fauci, we don't know if the pandemic started in a lab in Wuhan or evolved naturally, but we should want to know. Three million people have died in this pandemic and that should call us to explore all possibilities.

True.

Paul: Instead, government authorities, self-interested in continuing gain-of-function research, say there's nothing to see here.

There may be some truth to the assertion of self-interest. The international community of virologists is relatively small, and they tend to know one another. Peter Daszak, head of EcoHealth Alliance, which has been the main conduit for NIH research funds on coronaviruses to the Wuhan lab in China, and has worked closely with scientists in China, has been criticized for having a conflict of interest in his role as a member of the World Health Organization team that investigated the origins of SARS-CoV-2. More widely, scientists who do GOF research may be more confident about the safety of their work than the long history of lab accidents would suggest. Authorities at the NIH and elsewhere have tended to side with the natural-origin theory, the most salient counter-example being Robert Redfield, who cast his lot in with the GOF crowd shortly after stepping down as the head of the Centers for Disease Control. But it would stretch credulity to imply any significant monetary self-interest.

Fauci says school should be open 'full blast' five days a week in the fall

  Fauci says school should be open 'full blast' five days a week in the fall Anthony Fauci, President Biden's chief medical adviser, said Thursday that schools in the fall should be open "full blast" five days a week after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that people who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 resume life without masks or other restrictions.When asked by host Jake Tapper on CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper" if he agreed with CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and the president of the American Federation of Teachers that schools in the fall should be 100-percent open and in-person five days a week, Fauci said he did. "Yeah. I agree with that.

Paul: To arrive at the truth, the U.S. government should admit that the Wuhan Virology Institute was experimenting to enhance the coronavirus' ability to infect humans.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology, under the direction of Dr. Shi Zengli, was clearly doing GOF experiments before the pandemic arose. But GOF work is now commonplace. The real scandal is not that the Wuhan Institute was doing GOF work, it's that everyone does it. That, and not the Wuhan lab origin theory, is what we should all be arguing about.

Paul: For years, Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist in the U.S., has been collaborating with Dr. Shi Zeng-li of the Wuhan Institute, sharing his discoveries about how to create superviruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the NIH. The collaboration between the US and the Wuhan Institute continues. Drs. Baric and Shi worked together to insert bat virus spike protein into the backbone of the deadly SARS virus, and then used this man-made supervirus to infect human airway cells.

Baric and Shi did indeed collaborate on at least one NIH-funded project that could arguably be called GOF research (more on that below), more or less as Senator Paul described (though it was all done in cell cultures). However, the work on the actual SARS virus was done in Baric's lab in North Carolina, not in the Wuhan lab. There was no NIH-funded supervirus being cooked up in Wuhan.

Did the coronavirus come directly from animals or was it released from a lab? Top American scientists join call for answers.

  Did the coronavirus come directly from animals or was it released from a lab? Top American scientists join call for answers. In a letter to the journal Science, top U.S. infectious disease experts join call for more information on the origins of the virus that causes COVID.In a letter in the current issue of the journal Science, 18 infectious disease experts, immunologists and epidemiologists joined a global call for more information about the earliest days of the outbreak. There still isn't enough known, they said, to determine whether the coronavirus jumped directly from animals to people or whether it was released from a research laboratory in China.

The remark about Baric "sharing discoveries" with Shi is problematic in two ways. First, there's nothing sinister about it. Scientists share their discoveries all the time—that's how science works. If Baric had been doing classified work in an underground bunker for the Department of Defense and smuggled it to Shi, that would be reprehensible, but Baric's work was unclassified. Second, Paul's presumption that the flow of information went only one way, from Baric to Shi, ignores the fact that Shi is one of the most highly-respected virologists in the world.

There's also nothing particularly worrying about scientists in the U.S. collaborating with their peers in Wuhan. The Wuhan Institute has the biggest collection of bat coronaviruses in the world—U.S. scientists would be foolish not to collaborate with them.

Anthony Fauci: The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Senator Paul's claim that GOF research collaborations between the U.S. and China continue is almost certainly false. But before the pandemic year, the NIH had awarded a large grant to EcoHealth that would have funded GOF research ("We will use [spike] protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in [spike] protein sequences predict spillover potential."). It's unclear what portion of that work would have been performed in Wuhan, if any. In any case, the work never got started: shortly after the pandemic broke, the Trump Administration put the kibosh on it.

18 Scientists, Including One Who Worked With Wuhan Lab, Say COVID Lab Leak Theory Needs Study

  18 Scientists, Including One Who Worked With Wuhan Lab, Say COVID Lab Leak Theory Needs Study The scientists criticized a WHO-led team's report for drawing conclusions on the lab leak theory without sufficient evidence and urged more research.A March report from a team of World Health Organization–led scientists found a lab leak to be the "least likely" hypothesis. However, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, said the possibility requires "further investigation" because the team didn't have access to enough raw data to adequately analyze the likelihood of any single hypothesis.

Paul: Do you fund Dr. Baric's gain-of-function research?

Fauci: Dr. Baric is not doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it's according to the guidelines and it is being conducted in North Carolina not China.

Fauci is correct. In 2017, NIH lifted its moratorium on GOF research and issued guidelines under which such work could continue, on a case-by-case basis after review by a committee. However, the identity of the reviewers and their deliberations are kept secret. Lipsitch and Thomas Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, proposed revisions to bring greater transparency.

Paul: You don't think inserting a bat-virus spike protein that [Baric] got from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus is gain-of-function? You would be in a minority because at least two scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group saying that it is gain-of-function.

False, says Marc Lipsitch, the Harvard epidemiologist and one of the original members of the Cambridge Working Group. "It is just a fabrication to say we have made any statement as a group about work in Wuhan."

Fauci: Well, it is not. If you look at the grant and you look at the progress reports, it is not gain-of-function, despite the fact that people tweet that and write about it.

In an interview last year, Baric maintained that some work that involves enhancing viruses in the lab turns out to produce viruses that are actually less viable than what experimenters started with, so they haven't necessarily "gained" any "function." This is probably what Dr. Fauci is referring to.

Paul: "...under your tutelage, we were sending [funds] through EcoHealth.... to the Wuhan Institute..."

Fauci: Let me explain to you why that was done. The SARS-CoV-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected in China.

‘Black-ish’ Ending After Season 8, More 2021 Show Renewals and Cancelations

  ‘Black-ish’ Ending After Season 8, More 2021 Show Renewals and Cancelations Bookmark this page! With so many new shows coming, some fan favorites are coming to an end. Us Weekly will continue to update the full list below of renewals and cancelations. While some shows remain on the bubble, other series — some very beloved — learned early enough that they would be wrapping up. Last Man Standing, which aired the first six seasons on ABC before moving to Fox for three more, will come to an end in May 2021. Although Fox told the cast early that the show would end, star and producer Tim Allen still was upset about it. “We don’t want to wrap it up. We just want to say, ‘that was the end of the day,’ and not dwell that it’s the end of the show, because the family in the world of sitcoms goes on and you’re just not aware of their family anymore,” the comedian, 67, told Us exclusively in December 2020. “We were very invested in this group.” This Is Us, NBC’s most popular drama, will also come to an end in 2022 following the sixth season — something that creator Dan Fogelman has always said was the plan. In April 2019, the showrunner told The Hollywood Reporter that season 3 was viewed as a midway point of the series. “We never set out to make a television series that was going to last 18 seasons, so we have a very direct plan,” the Crazy, Stupid, Love writer said. “I have script pages I have written and I’m writing that really are deep, deep, deep into the future. We have a plan for what we’re going to do, and I know what the plan is.

Investigating, for the purpose of understanding potential pandemic viruses and how to prepare for them, is the guiding purpose of research. Knowing how dangerous bat coronaviruses like SARS-Cov-2 can be, it's hard to argue that scientists should just ignore them. The question is not whether or not to study them. The question is, are current study methods safe? Do they yield benefits that justify the risk?

Paul: Or perhaps it would have been possible to send [the research] to the Chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this knowledge and with these incredibly dangerous viruses.

The question presumes that U.S. scientists know more than Chinese scientists about dangerous viruses, which is false.

Paul: Government defenders of gain-of-function, such as yourself, say that COVID-19 mutations were random and not designed by man. But interestingly, the technique that Dr. Baric developed forces mutations by serial passage through cell culture, so that the mutations appear to be natural. In fact, Dr. Baric named the technique the "no see'm" technique because the mutations appear naturally. [Nicholson] Baker in New York magazine said, "nobody would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature."

Whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus shows signs of having been manipulated, or whether it is even possible to manipulate the virus in a lab without leaving telltale signs, is the subject of debate among scientists. Shortly after the pandemic broke out, Kristian Anderson of Scripps wrote the canonical article arguing that the virus most likely originated in nature, but it has been criticized for being inconclusive, most recently in journalist Nicholas Wade's opus. But it's not clear that "no see'm" techniques—such as passing a virus through a succession of animals—would truly be undetectable. In interviews last year, Jonathan Eisen, an evolutionary biologist at University of California, Davis, told Newsweek that in fact forensic geneticists could probably tell if a virus were manipulated in this way. As far as I know, no such analysis has turned up any evidence one way or the other.

Paul: Government authorities in the U.S., including yourself, unequivocally deny that COVID-19 could have escaped a lab.

False. Many government authorities, including Dr. Fauci and his boss, NIH head Francis Collins, have come out in favor of a thorough investigation of the origins of the coronavirus. So has the U.S. State Department.

Paul: Dr. Shi in Wuhan... wondered, could this new virus have come from her own laboratories? She checked her records... and found no matches. 'That really took a load off my mind, I hadn't slept for days.' The director of gain-of-function research at Wuhan lab couldn't sleep because she was terrified that it might be in her lab.

The senator is quoting from a profile of Shi in Scientific American.

Paul: Dr. Baric, an advocate of gain-of-function research.... responded, "Can you rule out a lab escape? The answer in this case is probably not."

This is what Baric told New York magazine's Nicholson Baker. Incidentally, Baric signed the letter in Science calling for further investigation of the lab-leak theory.

Dr. Fauci has been a favorite target of Republicans over just about every aspect of the pandemic response, including guidance on wearing masks, discredited COVID-19 treatments like hydroxychloroquine and China's alleged cover-up. Sen. Rand's aggressive questioning on the lab-origin theory generated heat, but little light. Which may have been the point.

Related Articles

  • Forget Herd Immunity! Winter COVID Surges Will Bring Lockdowns, Travel Bans, Crammed ICUs
  • The Controversial Experiments and Wuhan Lab Suspected of Starting the Coronavirus Pandemic
  • COVID-19 Vaccines and Fetal Tissue: The Science and Controversy Explained

Start your unlimited Newsweek trial

‘Black-ish’ Ending After Season 8, More 2021 Show Renewals and Cancelations .
Bookmark this page! With so many new shows coming, some fan favorites are coming to an end. Us Weekly will continue to update the full list below of renewals and cancelations. While some shows remain on the bubble, other series — some very beloved — learned early enough that they would be wrapping up. Last Man Standing, which aired the first six seasons on ABC before moving to Fox for three more, will come to an end in May 2021. Although Fox told the cast early that the show would end, star and producer Tim Allen still was upset about it. “We don’t want to wrap it up. We just want to say, ‘that was the end of the day,’ and not dwell that it’s the end of the show, because the family in the world of sitcoms goes on and you’re just not aware of their family anymore,” the comedian, 67, told Us exclusively in December 2020. “We were very invested in this group.” This Is Us, NBC’s most popular drama, will also come to an end in 2022 following the sixth season — something that creator Dan Fogelman has always said was the plan. In April 2019, the showrunner told The Hollywood Reporter that season 3 was viewed as a midway point of the series. “We never set out to make a television series that was going to last 18 seasons, so we have a very direct plan,” the Crazy, Stupid, Love writer said. “I have script pages I have written and I’m writing that really are deep, deep, deep into the future. We have a plan for what we’re going to do, and I know what the plan is.

usr: 5
This is interesting!