World Hady Amr's Middle East | Opinion
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The diplomatic voice covered by explosions
© Reuters An Israeli artillery position on the edge of the Gaza Strip. The efforts of the international community to end the new Israeli-Palestinian conflict seem clear. After ten days of violence, the foreign ministers of the European Union will, Tuesday, will hold an emergency visioference on the climbing of the fights between Israel and the Palestinians .
It appears that under President, the United States is fine with Hamas, despite the fact that it is a terrorist organization.
During his media appearance with Israel's Prime Ministerin Jerusalem on Tuesday, Secretary of State indicated that in the wake of Hamas' is the most pressing issue on the agenda.
Although Bidenlast Thursday that relief efforts for Gaza will be conducted "in a manner that does not permit Hamas to simply restock its military arsenal," his advisors recognize that there is no way to prevent Hamas from intercepting international humanitarian aid and using it to rebuild its war machine. Ahead of Blinken's visit, a senior State Department official was asked to relate to this concern.
Calls mount for Gaza-Israel cease-fire, greater US efforts
The U.N. Security Council and Muslim nations convened emergency meetings Sunday to demand a stop to civilian bloodshed as Israeli warplanes carried out the deadliest single attacks in nearly a week of unrelenting Hamas rocket barrages and Israeli airstrikes. President Joe Biden gave no signs of pressuring Israel to agree to an immediate cease-fire despite new calls from some Democrats for the Biden administration to get more involved. His ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, told an emergency high-level meeting of the Security Council that the United States was “working tirelessly through diplomatic channels" to stop the fighting.
"How can the U.S. guarantee aid to Gaza won't be diverted toward replenishing the Hamas arsenal?" a reporter asked.
The official responded, "As we've seen in life, as we all know in life, there are no guarantees."
In other words: It could happen.
In fact, it isn't simply that it could happen—Israel's counter-offensive against Hamas' terror infrastructure in Gaza revealed that it is guaranteed to happen. Over the past decade, Hamas spent hundreds of millions of dollars building an underground offensive tunnel system with more than one hundred miles of tunnels. The subterranean complex housed Hamas' missile launchers and its missile stores. It served as bunkers and assembly points for Hamas' terror forces. It served as weapons production facilities. The materials for Hamas' spending spree were, of course, repurposed construction materials imported to Gaza for "humanitarian" and "civilian" purposes.
Biden 'expressed his support for a ceasefire' in call with Israeli Prime Minister, White House says
President Joe Biden voiced support for a ceasefire Monday as intensifying violence between Israel and Hamas militants in Gaza entered a second week. © Evan Vucci/AP President Joe Biden delivers remarks about COVID vaccinations in the South Court Auditorium at the White House, Wednesday, May 12, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) During a telephone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Biden "expressed his support for a ceasefire and discussed US engagement with Egypt and other partners towards that end," a White House description of the call read.
During the latest round of fighting, supporters of aid to the Gaza Strip pointed to Gaza's ongoing water and sewage crises. But here too, the record is clear. In 2014, Egypt blocked most missile imports to Gaza when it destroyed Hamas' tunnel network between Gaza and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula. But with technical assistance from Iran, Hamas developed a massive domestic missile production capability. The key components of those missiles were water pipes imported into Gaza over the previous seven years for "humanitarian" purposes.
Given this state of affairs, it is impossible to view "humanitarian aid to Gaza" as anything other than a resupply for Hamas—and a guarantee that the terror group will rebuild its capabilities and launch a new war against Israel in due time.
The lead State Department official on U.S. policy toward Hamas specifically, and the Palestinians more generally, is Hady Amr, deputy assistant secretary of state for Israel and the Palestinians. Amr was dispatched to Israel during the recent 11-day war to advance the Biden administration's new policy.
Biden bestows Medal of Honor on Korean War veteran
President Joe Biden awarded his first Medal of Honor on Friday to a 94-year-old retired Army colonel for bravery under enemy fire more than a half-century ago in the Korean War. It took a policy change for retired Col. Ralph Puckett Jr. to receive the military's highest honor. The 2020 defense policy bill removed a requirement that such awards be given within five years of a valorous act. “Today we are hosting a true American hero and awarding an honor that is long overdue — more than 70 years overdue,” Biden said during the East Room ceremony. “Though I understand that your first response to us hosting this event was to ask why all the fuss.
In 2018, Amr was the lead author of a Brookings Institution paper on U.S. policy toward Hamas. Titled, "Ending Gaza's Perpetual Crisis—A New U.S. Approach," the report proposed a new U.S. policy toward Hamas, the Palestinian Authority and Israel. Amr called for the U.S. to use the next round of war between Hamas and Israel to launch a new policy toward the terror group and the Jewish state.
Amr's plan had three components. First, it effectively accepted Hamas as a legitimate actor despite the fact that it is a terrorist organization controlled by Iran. Second, it called for the PLO-controlled Palestinian Authority (PA) to unite with Hamas and gave the PA a free pass for funding and supporting terrorism against Israel and rejecting Israel's right to exist. Finally, in regards to Israel, Amr's report called for the U.S. to use direct and indirect means to coerce Israel into making unreciprocated concessions to both Hamas and the PA, even while admitting such concessions would endanger Israel.
U.S. law bars the government and private citizens from providing material aid to terrorist organizations. So since Hamas seized Gaza in 2007, the U.S has avoided any direct support for the terror-controlled enclave. Instead, the U.S. sought to empower the PA and bring prosperity to the Palestinians governed by the PA in Judea and Samaria while pursuing peace between the PA and Israel. The idea was that the Palestinians would abandon support for Hamas when they saw the disparity between impoverished Hamas-controlled Gaza and the wealthy PLO-controlled PA in Judea and Samaria.
Hamas violence meets Gulf silence
Certain Gulf states’ silence on Hamas’s violence is particularly puzzling.At the onset of the crisis, the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan - all of which normalized relations with the Jewish state last year - criticized Israel. Sudan rebuked Israeli moves as "coercive action," the UAE called on Israel to "take responsibility for de-escalation" at the Al-Aqsa mosque, and Morocco's King Mohammed VI noted that Israeli "violations" could "fuel tensions." Bahrain punched the hardest, asking the Israeli government "to stop these rejected provocations against the people of Jerusalem.
This policy did not pan out. It didn't work, on the one hand, because corrupt PA officials systematically looted international aid primarily to pay salaries for terrorists, but also to feather their own nests. The PA's corruption and support for terrorism blocked economic development in its governed areas.
On the other hand, the U.S. permitted Hamas to draw funds from other international financial backers—especially Qatar and theRelief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the UN agency devoted to Palestinian "refugees." This aid has enabled Gaza to stay afloat financially while permitting Hamas to build its military machine.
The result is that Hamas remains more popular than the PA among Palestinians in Judea and Samaria, as well as Gaza. A testament to this came earlier this month, when PA President Mahmoud Abbas canceled elections he had scheduled for the PA legislative council and the presidency. Abbas realized that, as has been the case since he first began his four-year term in office 16 years ago, Hamas will win any new PA election in Judea and Samaria.
In 2018, Amr argued the best response to PA corruption and support for terrorism is to sponsor other Palestinian terrorists. Specifically, he argued, the time had come for the U.S. to begin supporting Hamas. True, it's illegal. But Amr argued, in deliberately bureaucratic language, that the U.S. can easily sidestep such laws.
Blinken in Israel on Mideast tour to shore up Gaza truce
JERUSALEM (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has arrived in Israel at the start of a Middle East tour aimed at shoring up the Gaza cease-fire. He will face the same obstacles that have stifled a wider peace process for more than a decade, including a hawkish Israeli leadership, Palestinian divisions and deeply rooted tensions surrounding Jerusalem and its holy sites. The 11-day Gaza war killed more than 250 people, mostly Palestinians, and caused widespread destruction in the impoverished coastal territory.
As he put it, "The United States may also want to further refine and reissue its 'contact policy,' which is more than a decade old, to give U.S. NGOs the confidence that they can effectively engage in the Gaza Strip in a manner that is responsible but makes the risk of litigation more manageable." The "contact policy" Amr referred to is the guidance USAID issued to contractors in the Palestinian-ruled areas a week after Hamas first seized control over the Gaza Strip in 2007. That guidance stated that contractors may not have any contact with people affiliated with any designated terrorist organization.
In plain English, Amr's solution for the widespread infiltration of Palestinian terrorist affiliates in Palestinian government in both Judea and Samaria and Gaza is to change the law to permit greater U.S.-sanctioned cooperation with terrorists or terrorist-backed entities operating there. Amr wants contractors working with the U.S. government to have the confidence that the U.S. will not prosecute them when they collaborate with group such as Hamas.
Amr also called for the U.S. to reinstate its funding of UNRWA. Unfortunately, this policy is itself legally questionable since more than half—some say up to 90 percent—of UNRWA employees in Gaza are members of Hamas.
Amr noted ruefully that following the U.S. transfer of its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and its closure of the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem that had served as an unofficial embassy to the PA, the PA cut off its ties with America. To rebuild those ties, Amr called for the U.S. to restore funding to the PA despite its funding of terrorism. He also called for the U.S. to coerce Israel into transferring 50 percent of land it controls in Judea and Samaria to the PA.
Pollster Frank Luntz concealed his work for GOP in 2020 L.A. Times op-ed: Will media ever learn?
Luntz embarrasses another media outlet by not revealing who's paying him. Why do they keep falling for his act? Frank Luntz Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call
Amr called as well for the U.S. to minimize the significance of the transfer of the embassy. During his visit with Abbas in Ramallah Tuesday afternoon, Blinken made clear that the Biden administration is following Amr's playbook on Jerusalem as well. He announced the Biden administration is opening a consulate in Jerusalem for the Palestinians. Likewise, the administration's announcement this week that former U.S. consul to Jerusalem Michael Ratney will arrive in Jerusalem next month to serve as acting ambassador signaled it intends to downgrade the significance of the embassy move and embed the Palestinians' demand for the partition of Jerusalem into the administration's hostile posture toward Israel.
As for Israel, Amr argued that Israel should be forced to abandon its policy of containing Hamas and instead give Hamas control of its supply lines. Amr called for ending Israel's maritime blockade of the terror regime's Mediterranean coast, removing limitations on the supplies entering Gaza, permitting the entrance of Gazans into Israel and their transit through Israel to the PA-controlled areas of Judea and Samaria. Amr argued that Israel should also be compelled to accept a unified PA government that includes Hamas terrorists.
Israel would be convinced to act against its own security and national interest, Amr maintained, through direct U.S. pressure and economic pressure from the. Regarding the latter, Amr called for diplomatic and economic sanctions against Israel—or, as he euphemistically wrote, the EU should "provide economic and political incentives and disincentives for Israel as part of a Gaza aid package."
Before his appointment, Amr had a long history of antagonism toward Israel and support for Hamas and U.S. engagement with the terror group, more generally. Now, as the Biden policies to date have made clear, Amr is both the author and the primary implementer of U.S. policy toward Israel and its terrorist enemies. That policy, as his 52-page Brookings paper from three years ago made clear, is to empower Hamas terrorists and weaken Israel.
The Biden administration's rhetorical endorsement of Israel's right to defend itself provides a welcome contrast with the antagonism of many. But alongside the rhetoric lies a more sinister and destructive substantive policy. If left unchallenged, the fruits of that policy will be seen in the coming years, as Hamas terrorists renew and expand their war against the Jewish state.
Caroline B. Glick is a senior columnist at Israel Hayom and the author of The Israeli Solution: A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East, (Crown Forum, 2014). From 1994 to 1996, she served as a core member of Israel's negotiating team with the Palestine Liberation Organization.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Opinion: Naomi Osaka's shocking French Open withdrawal offers lessons for all involved .
Naomi Osaka's well-being is more important than any tennis match, but the way this has played out has done no favors for anyone involved. Osaka, after winning the last two Grand Slam events, won’t get a chance to make it three in a row and prove herself on clay, where she’s apparently had a crisis of confidence this year. The French Open will surely come off to many as insensitive for going to such great lengths to enforce its rules. And fans across the world who like watching Osaka play tennis won’t get the opportunity to do so on one of the sport’s biggest stages.